...(3d Howard, 2¿JO), the Supreme Court of the United States expressly held " that the shores of the navigable waters and the soils under them were not...granted by the Constitution to the United States, but belonged to the States by virtue of their sovereignty ;" for, as the Court say," to give to the United...

...not convey title to such lands as the title thereto was in the State of Alabama. The Court stated : " 'First. The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively. " 'Second. The new States have...

...right to all their navigable waters and the soil under them. Then, in 1845, Mr. Justice McKinley said : First, the shores of navigable waters and the soils...granted by the Constitution to the United States. Senator DOXNELL. Are you giving us the citations where these various quotations occur, Mr. Attorney...

...right to all their navigable waters tnd the soil under them. Then, in 1845, Mr. Justice McKinley said : First, the shores of navigable waters and the soils...granted by the Constitution to the United States. Senator DONNELL. Are you giving us the citations where these various quotations occur, Mr. Attorney...

...principles of domestic law and constitution law as stated in that Pollard case. I quote from the decision. First. The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were 0 granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the Stall respectively. Second....

...this Court is, that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under the same in the original States were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the several States and that the new States since admitted have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction...

...this Court is that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under the same in the original States were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the several States and that the new States since admitted have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction...

...the case of Pollard v. Hagan, in 1845, 3 Howard 212, the United States Supreme Court held definitely "the shores of navigable waters and the soils under...granted by the Constitution to the United States." Again in 1867, in the case of Memford v. Wardell, 6 Wallace 436, the Supreme Court held "the soils...

...Supreme Court in the early case of Pollard v. Plagan (3 How. 212, 229 (1845)) in the following words: First. The .shores of navigable waters, and the soils...them, were not granted by the Constitution to the ( nitcd States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Second. The new States have the same...

....'{67 (1842)). "liy the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution t(> the United States but were reserved to the Stall's respectively: secondly, the new Stales have...