...river between high and low water mark. It was held that the shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, and hence the jurisdiction exercised thereover by the federal government, before the formation of the...

...these rights. * * * By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions.: First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. Thirdly, the right of the United States to the public lands and the power of Congress to make all needful...

...their respective limits. "The source of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted l>y the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States re-I*ctively : and the new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject...

...as to need no further consideration (p. 482). * * * In summing up its conclusions, the court held: "First, the shores of navigable waters and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. Thirdly, the right of the United States to the public lands, and the power of Congress to make all...

...as to need no further consideration (p. 482). * * * In summing up its conclusions, the court held: " First, the shores of navigable waters and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. Thirdly, the right of the United States to the public lands, and the power of Congress to make all...

...to need no further consideration (p. 482). * * * In summing up its conclusions, the court held : " First, the shores of navigable waters and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. Thirdly, the right of the United States to the public lands, and the power of Congress to make all...

...: " By the preceding course of reasoning, we have arrived at these general conclusions: First, that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under...have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction orer his subject as the original States." (Pollard v. Hagan, 3 How. 230.) In Hardin v. Jordan, the...

...as follows : " By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, The shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constiution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Second. The new States...

...as follows : " By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, The shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constiution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Second. The new States...

...rights * * * By tli«? preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these g neral coiirhH"»" '• First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not grant*** by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States rt?-~ spectively....