...original States possessed over the navigable waters within their respective limits. It was also held that the shores of- navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively, and the new States had the same...

...original States possessed over the navigable waters within their respective limits. It was also held that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States but were reserved to the States respectively, and the new States had the same...

...that Alabama had as much power over those navigable waters as the original States possessed over the navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States, respectively, anil the new States had the same...

...pursuance thereof. " By the preceding course of reasoning, we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Second, the new Slates have the same right, sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...

...pursuance thereof. " By the preceding course of reasoning, we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Second, the new States have the same right, sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...

...Decker v. Baltimore etc. RR Co. (US a Ct NY) 1 ICR 434. (c) The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to...States but were reserved to the States respectively. Cited in Decker v. Baltimore etc., RR Co., (US Ct. NY) 1 ICR 441. (ca) Navigable waters of the United...

...original States. The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them, between high and low-water mark, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respeetively. and the new States have the «une rights and jurisdiction on this subject as the original...

...river between high and low water mark. It was held that the shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, and hence the jurisdiction exercised thereover by the federal government, before the formation of the...

...these rights. * * * By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions.: First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. Thirdly, the right of the United States to the public lands and the power of Congress to make all needful...

...rights. * * * By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions. : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. Thirdly, the right of the United States to the public lands and the power of Congress to make all needful...