 By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions.: First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively....  The Monthly Law Reporter - Page 1821857Full view - About this book
 | Curtis Holbrook Lindley - Mineral lands - 1903 - 2150 pages
...and their banks as far as highwater mark belong to the state, and not to the federal government. They were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the statec respectively, and the new states have the same rights o^ sovereignty and jurisdiction with regard... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1905
...Alabama over them as the original states possess over navigable waters within their respective limits. The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under...States, but were reserved to the states respectively; and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1905
...Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively : and the new states havw the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original states had. Pollard v. Hagan. 3 How. 212, 11 L. ed. 565. It has been held that under the British North America... | |
 | United States. Army. Judge Advocate General's Department. War Department - 1907 - 471 pages
...shores of navigable waters and the soil under them. — The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but reserved to the States respectively. And the new States have the same rights as the original States/... | |
 | Colorado Scientific Society - 1908
...further from the syllabus of the leading case of Pollard's Lessee vs. Hagan (3 Howard, 212), supra: "The shores of navigable waters and the soils under...States, but were reserved to the states respectively; and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original... | |
 | U.S. Army Engineer School - Riparian rights - 1908 - 141 pages
...to all their navigable waters and the soil under them. The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to...States, but were reserved to the States respectively. And new States have the same rights of sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original... | |
 | Washington State Bar Association - Bar associations - 1911
...In Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 3 Howard, p. 230, the following fundamental principles were announced: "First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original states." In McCready v. Virginia, 94 US pp. 394-5, it is said: "The principle has long been settled in this... | |
| |
