 By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions.: First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively....  The Monthly Law Reporter - Page 1841857Full view - About this book
 | United States. Congress. House. Interstate and Foreign Commerce - Water-power - 1930 - 158 pages
...Justice Peckham said for the court, referring to the decision in Pollard v. Hagan (3 How. 212), that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States but were reserved to the States respectively, and the new States had the same... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1930 - 156 pages
...Justice Peckham said for the court, referring to the decision in Pollard v. Hagan (3 How. 212), that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States but were reserved to the States respectively, and the new States had the same... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - Railroads - 1934 - 972 pages
...appurtenant to the riparian lands. In Pollard's lessee \. Hagan, 3 Howard 212, 230, the court said, " The shores of navigable waters and the soils under...States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; " and also " The new States have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1938 - 270 pages
...this Court is, that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under the same in the Original States were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the several States; and that the new States since admitted have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Public lands - 1939 - 530 pages
...or grant of property rights. In Pollard v. Hagan (3 Howard 212, 1>. 230) , the Supreme Court said: "The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them were not granted liy the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States, respectively." See als'o... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1939 - 304 pages
...pursuance thereof.' " "By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions: First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were uot granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1940 - 506 pages
...this court is that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under the same in the original States were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the several States, and that the new State since admitted have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1941 - 824 pages
...this court is that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under the same in the original State? were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the several States, and that the new State since admitted have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction... | |
| |
