Epistemic injustice : power and the ethics of knowing
Miranda Fricker (Author), Oxford University Press
"In this exploration of new territory between ethics and epistemology, Miranda Fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic type of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower. Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes in philosophy, but in order to reveal the ethical dimension of our epistemic practices the focus must shift to injustice. Fricker adjusts the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. The book explores two different types of epistemic injustice, each driven by a form of prejudice, and from this exploration comes a positive account of two corrective ethical-intellectual virtues. The characterization of these phenomena casts light on many issues, such as social power, prejudice, virtue, and the genealogy of knowledge, and it proposes a virtue epistemological account of testimony. In this ground-breaking book, the entanglements of reason and social power are traced in a new way, to reveal the different forms of epistemic injustice and their place in the broad pattern of social injustice."--Book cover. Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower
1 online resource (x, 188 pages)
9780191519307, 9781281147196, 9780191706844, 0191519308, 1281147192, 0191706841
183915514
Testimonial injustice
Prejudice in the credibility economy
Towards a virtue epistemological account of testimony
The virtue of testimonial justice
The genealogy of testimonial justice
Original significances : the wrong revisited
Hermeneutical injustice
Oxford scholarship online Connect to electronic book via Oxford Scholarship Online
University of Alberta Access (Unlimited Concurrent Users)
doi.org Oxford Scholarship Online
doi.org Full-text