...to all their navigable waters and the soil under them.* The shores of navigable wateraand the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to...States, but were reserved to the States respectively. And new States have the same rights of sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...

...this court is, that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under the same in the original States were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the several States, and that the new States since admitted have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction...

...We can, then, well say, that it has been settled by the highest tribunal in this country, 1st, that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not 1 See ante, §§ 111-114. 8 Pollard's Lessee e. Hagan, 12 How. 224. 3 See 9 How. 471 ; 10 How. 82;...

...this court is, that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under the same in the original States were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the several States, and that the new States since admitted have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction...

...enjoy in a lawful manner "without tax, impost or duty therefor." The shores of navigable waters, and soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution...States, but were reserved to the states respectively, and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...

...enjoy in a lawful manner "without tax, impost or duty therefor." The F bores of navigable waters, and soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution...States, but were reserved to the states respectively, and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...

...insolvent law. — Duncan vs. Darstetal., 1 Howard, p. 301. The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them, were not granted by the Constitution to...States, but were reserved to the States respectively, and the new States have the same rights over this subject as the original States.— Pollard vs. Hagan,...

...law. — Duncan vs. Darst et al., 1 Howard, p. 301. The shores of navigable waters and the Foil Bmder them, were not granted by the Constitution to the...States, but were reserved to the States respectively, and the new States have the same rights over this subject as the original States. — Pollard vs. Hagan,...

...leading one, and was ably argued and fully considered. The Supreme Court of the United States held: "First. The shores of navigable waters and the soils...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. " Thirdly. The right of the United States to the public lands, and the power of Congress to make all...

...Wadddl, 16 Pet., 307. Russell v. Jersey Co., 15 H , 426.) The shores of navigable rivers and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to...States, but were reserved to the States respectively, and new States have the same rights, sovereigntv, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...