 It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it must live and have its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places...  The Central Law Journal - Page 1191908Full view - About this book
 | James Treat Carter - Corporations - 1919 - 298 pages
...Privatrecht, p. 59; Henderson, The Position of Foreign Corporations in American Constitutional Law. p. 42. places; and its residence in one state creates no insuperable objection to its power to contract in another. It is, indeed, a mere artificial being, invisible and intangible, yet it is... | |
 | Albert Sidney Bolles - Commercial law - 1920 - 250 pages
...that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that ks existence there will not be recognised in other places, and its residence in one state creates...objection to its power of contracting in another." 43. A corporation therefore can by its agents go into another state and make any contract or conveyance... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 1050 pages
...boundaries of the sovereignty by which it is created, and must dwell in the place of its creation, though its residence in one state creates no Insuperable objection to Its power to transact business in another, provided the laws of such other state permit it. [Ed. Note. — For... | |
 | Commercial law - 1926 - 310 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places ; and its residence...intangible; yet it is a person for certain purposes in law. As a natural person, resident in one place, may contract by agent in another; so a corporation... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1926 - 1260 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow 1h:it its existence there will not be recognized in other places: and its residence in...state creates no insuperable objection to its power of contrii<>tin<r in another. It is indeed я mere artificial I>eing, invisible and intangible, yet it... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1883 - 1186 pages
...live and have its being in that State only, yet it does not follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places; and its residence in...objection to its power of contracting in another. The corporation must show that the law of its creation gave it authority to make such contracts. Yet,... | |
 | Victoria. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 776 pages
...that its existence there will not be recognized hi AND A NOTH Kit . other places; and its residence iu one State creates no insuperable objection to its power of contracting in another. The corporation must show that the law of its creation gave it authority to make such contracts. Yet... | |
 | David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, James Pennewill, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, Charles L. Terry, William J. Storey - Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 630 pages
...Williams v. Creswell, 51 Miss., 817; Lathrop v. Union Pacific RR Co., 1 McA., 234. While a corporation is indeed a mere artificial being, invisible and intangible,...person for certain purposes in contemplation of law. Beaston v. The Farmers' Bank of Delaware, 12 Pet., 135; United States v. Amedy, 11 Wheat., 412. A suit... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 1088 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not follow by any means that its existence there will not be recognized in other places, and its residence in one state creates no insuperable objection 1 to its power of contracting in another. It j Is, indeed, a mere artificial being, invisible and intangible;... | |
| |
