It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it must live and have its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places... The Central Law Journal - Page 1191908Full view - About this book
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1875 - 674 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places; and its residence in...invisible and intangible; yet it is a person, for certain purThe Farmers, etc., Ins. Co. v. Hurrah. poses in contemplation of law, and has been recognized as... | |
| Nevada. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1877 - 1090 pages
...justice, in delivering the opinion of the court, using the following language : •'It (a corporation) is indeed a mere artificial being, invisible and intangible....and has been recognized as such by the decisions of the court. It was so held in the wse of the United States v. AineJy (11 Wheat. 412), and iu Illusion... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 2136 pages
...have its beiiisr in that state, yet it does riot by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places; and its residence in...insuperable objection to Its power of contracting iu another." This is quoted with approval in Shaw v. Ouincy Mining Company, 145 US 444, 12 Sup. Ct.... | |
| Nova Scotia. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1881 - 614 pages
...its being in that State only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places ; and its residence...is, indeed, a mere artificial being, invisible and untangible : yet it is a person for certain purposes in contemplation of law. Corporations created... | |
| Law - 1881 - 982 pages
...created, its existence as an artificial person may be acknowledged and recognized in other States. Its residence in one State creates no insuperable...objection to its power of contracting in another. It is a principle as inviolable us it is fundamental and conservative, thnt the right to hold land, and the... | |
| Law - 1881 - 1014 pages
...created, its existence as an artificial person may be acknowledged and recognized in other States. Its residence in one State creates no insuperable...objection to its power of contracting in another. It is a principle as inviolable as it is fundamental and conservative, that the right to hold land, and the... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1902 - 988 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence ther« will not t Pub. Co." Desty Robert" Robert Desty( was so held in the case of United State* v. Amedy, 11 Wheat 412, 6 L. ed. 507, and in Beaston v. Farmer*... | |
| Joseph Story - Conflict of laws - 1883 - 972 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places; and its residence in...objection to its power of contracting in another.' These dicta are open to this further observation, which always weakens the force of any judicial dicta,... | |
| Joseph Story - Conflict of laws - 1883 - 962 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places; and its residence in...state creates no insuperable objection to its power of contract! ng in another. ' These dicta are open to this further observation, which always weakens the... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1884 - 1062 pages
...live and have its being in that state only, yet it does not follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places; and its residence in...objection to its power of contracting in another. The corporation must show that the law of its creation gave it authority to mako such contracts. Yet,... | |
| |