 It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it must live and have its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places...  The Central Law Journal - Page 1191908Full view - About this book
 | Richard Peters - Law reports, digests, etc - 1860 - 836 pages
...that slate only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognised in other places; and its residence in one state creates no insuperable objection to ils power of contracting in another. It is indeed a mere artificial being, invisible and intangible;... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - Law reports, digests, etc - 1863 - 732 pages
...only, [in which it was created,] yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places, and its residence in...recognized as such by the decisions of this court." When, therefore, a foreign corporation brings an action in one of our courts, we do not stop to inquire... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1863 - 654 pages
...ita being in that State only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places; and its residence in...objection to its power of contracting in another." This doctrine has been adopted by text writers on corporations, and by Courts in judicial decisions.... | |
 | Nevada. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1868 - 630 pages
...Justice, in delivering the opinion of the Court, using the following language : " It (a corporation) is indeed a mere artificial being, invisible and intangible....and has been recognized as such by the decisions of the Court. It was so held in the case of the United States v. Amcdy, 11 Wheaton, 412, and in JBeaston... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1868 - 658 pages
...follow, that its existence there will not be recognized in other places ; and its residence in our State creates no insuperable objection to its power of contracting in another. * * * It is sufficient that its existence, as an artificial person, in the state of its creation, is acknowledged... | |
 | Benjamin Vaughan Abbott, Austin Abbott - Corporation law - 1869 - 1028 pages
...its being in that State only, yet it does not by any means, follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places ; and its residence...It is indeed a mere artificial being, invisible and mtangible ; yet it is a person, for certain purposes in contemplation of law. Corporations created... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - Law reports, digests, etc - 1869 - 642 pages
...live and have its being in that State only, yet it does not follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places ; and its residence...objection to its power of contracting in another." It is also clear, that the first clause of the section was intended to prolong, as well as to limit, the... | |
 | Law - 1869 - 818 pages
...live and have its being in that State only, yet it docs not follow tha* its existence there will not be recognized in other places, and its residence in...insuperable objection to its power of contracting in an other. It is sufficient that its existence as an artificial person in the State of its creation,... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - Leading cases - 1870 - 708 pages
...its being in that state only, yet it does not by any means follow that its existence there will not be recognized in other places ; and its residence...recognized as such by the decisions of this court. It was so held in the case of The United States v. Amedy, 11 Wheat. 412, and in Beaston v. The Farmer's... | |
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals - Law reports, digests, etc - 1871 - 880 pages
...Merriwether v. Mobile & Ohio RR Co. APPEAL FROM HICKMAN CIRCUIT COURT. 1. THE RESIDENCE OF A CORPORATION IN ONE STATE CREATES NO INSUPERABLE OBJECTION TO ITS POWER OF CONTRACTING IN ANOTHER. — Although a corporation must live and hare its being in that state only in which it was created,... | |
| |
