 Is that a person guilty of negligence should be held responsible for all the consequences which a prudent and experienced man, fully acquainted with all the circumstances which In fact existed, whether they could have been ascertained by reasonable diligence...  The Northeastern Reporter - Page 201903Full view - About this book
 | Railroad law - 1901 - 1020 pages
...experience as well, * * * is that a person guilty of negligence should be held responsible for all the consequences which a prudent and experienced man,...could have been ascertained by reasonable diligence or R Cas (NS) Louisville & NR Co. v. Quick not, would, at the time of the negligent act, have thought... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1222 pages
...negligence should be held responsible for all the conseqnences which a prudent and experienced person, fully acquainted with all the circumstances which...by reasonable diligence or not, would at the time ot the negligent act have thought reasonably possible to follow, II they had occurred to him. Order... | |
 | Indiana. Appellate Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1903 - 820 pages
...question appears to us to be that a person guilty of negligence should bo held responsible for all the consequences which a prudent and experienced man,...possible to follow, if they had occurred to his mind." In §34 of the same work is the following: "If the negligent City of Elwood ». Langhliu. acts of two... | |
 | Railroad law - 1903 - 1010 pages
...the rule was stated to be, "That a person guilty of negligence, should be held responsible for all the consequences which a prudent and experienced man,...existed, whether they could have been ascertained bv reasonable diligence or not, would, at the time of the negligent act, have thought reasonably possible... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1903 - 1024 pages
...32 South. 773.] NEGLIGENCE — Proximate Cause. — A person guilty of negligence is liable for all the consequences which a prudent and experienced man, fully acquainted with all of the existing circumstances, would, at the time of the negligent act, have thought reasonably possible... | |
 | Railroad law - 1904 - 970 pages
...responsible for all the consequences that may or do flow therefrom, but only for such consequences as a prudent and experienced man, fully acquainted with all the circumstances which in fact exist at the moment, could have foreseen or reasonably anticipated." Fowlkes v. Southern Ry. Co., 96... | |
 | Texas. Court of Civil Appeals - Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 778 pages
...and delivering telegraphic messages, fully acquainted with all the existing facts and circumstances, would, at the time of the negligent act, have thought...possible to follow, if they had occurred to his mind. Shearm. & Eedf. on Neg., sec. 28. When such consequences are shown, the "natural and continuous sequence,"... | |
 | Thomas Johnson Michie - Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 952 pages
...responsible for all the consequences that may or do flow therefrom, but only for such consequences as a prudent and experienced man, fully acquainted with all the circumstances which in fact exist at that moment, could have foreseen or reasonably anticipated. Fowlkes v. Southern R. Co., 96... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 1274 pages
...question appears to ns to be that a person guilty of negligence should be held responsible for all the consequences which a prudent and experienced man....circumstances which in fact existed (whether they could bave been ascertained by reasonable diligence or not), would, at the time of the negligent act, have... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - Torts - 1907 - 1028 pages
...in one case, "A person guilty of negligence, or an unlawful act, should be held responsible for all the consequences which a prudent and experienced man,...with all the circumstances which in fact existed, would at the time of the negligent or unlawful act have thought reasonably to follow, if they had occurred... | |
| |
