 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1885 - 1040 pages
...No such limitation is placed upon the statute of this state. By the statute of Illinois the recovery shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin of the deceased, while in Iowa the recovery shall be disposed of as other personal estate, except that... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1885 - 916 pages
...must be one residing in the state or appointed by its authority. The statute says the amount recovered shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin. Why not add here, also, by construction, " if they reside in the state of New Jersey?" It is obvious... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - Railroad law - 1885 - 650 pages
...Western KR Co. v. Miller, 19 Mich. 305. appointed by its authority. The statute says the amount recovered shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin. Why not add here also, by construction, ' if they reside in the State of New Jersey ' ? It is obvious... | |
 | Appellate courts - 1908 - 848 pages
...this view interpolate into the statute what is not there. * * * The statute says the amount recovered shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin. Why not add here, also, by construction, 'if they reside in the state of New Jersey'? It is obvious... | |
 | Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 938 pages
...action shall be brought by and in the names of the personal representatives of such deceased person, and the amount recovered in every such action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow or widower and next of kin of such deceased person, and shall be distributed to such widow and next... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 702 pages
...seen, the cause of action created by the statute is not in right of the estate of the deceased, but is "for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin of such deceased person," and the measure of recovery is not the same, still, the cause of action is the "wrongful act, neglect or... | |
 | Arizona. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 648 pages
...not be liable for his debts, instead of providing, as the statute then did, that the amount recovered shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin of the decedent. Since this modification of the statute, it has not been regarded as essential that the... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 1182 pages
...this view interpolate into the statute what is not there. . . . The statute says the amount recovered shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin. \Vhy not add here, also, by construction, 'if they reside in the state of Xew Jersey?' It is obvious... | |
 | James Barr Ames, Jeremiah Smith - Torts - 1909 - 760 pages
...of the deceased, or where the plaintiff is a third person suing in the capacity of administrator ? of the widow and next of kin of such deceased person ; and that in every such action the jury may give such damages as they shall deem fair and just, with reference... | |
 | United States - 1910 - 1354 pages
...this view interpolate into the statute what is not there. * * * The statute says the amount recovered shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin. Why not add here, also, by construction, 'if they reside in the State of New Jersey?' It is obvious... | |
| |
Every such action shall be brought by and In the names of the personal representatives of such deceased person, and the amount recovered In every such action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin of such deceased person... 
