...prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution. It is not intended to say that these words comprehend that commerce, which is completely internal,...

...States."187 The Supreme Court has held that this power is "plenary and complete in itself'188 and that it "may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution."189 Given this broad mandate, Congress would appear to face little difficulty finding...

...introduced into the interior." He went on to say that Congress's power to regulate commerce was complete and "may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations," other than those prescribed in the Constitution itself. The chief justice said it was obvious that the power to...

...respect to the Commerce Power TUB (-power [the Commerce Power], like all others vested in Congress is in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no . other fhjn arc prescribed in the contfitutioo. (Emphasis added.) mb-i limitation on the plenary legislative...

...to define "regulate." Marshall determined that "This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution itself." Thus the Court concluded that Congress had constitutional authority to regulate commercial...

...the states, 93 and, as Marshall stated in Gibbons v Ogden, each of Congress's delegated powers "is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution." 94 Hammer v Dagenhart was directly at odds with Marshall's position. It rested on the view that Congress...

...involved. But the Supreme Court disagreed. In 1824 Marshall wrote that the power of the commerce clause was "complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in the Constitution."13 The Fulton monopoly was broken, interstate transportation was given an immediate boost....

...The power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states is supreme and plenary. It is " complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than arc prescribed in the Constitution." Gibbons v. Of/den, 9 Wheat. 1, 196, 6 L. ed. 23, 70. The conviction...

...government's legitimate power to regulate commerce among the states was plenary. Consider Marshall's words: "If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of congress, though limited to specified objects, is plenary as to those objects, the power over commerce with foreign nations, and...

...or compromise, or so it seemed: "This power [over commerce], like all others vested in congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution. ... If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of congress, though limited to specified objects,...