But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter. The Law Relating to Cheques - Page 41by Eric Russell Watson - 1902 - 142 pagesFull view - About this book
| West Virginia - Law - 1907 - 710 pages
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable; but a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
| New York (State). Board of Statutory Consolidation - Law - 1907 - 1252 pages
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
| Illinois - Law - 1907 - 644 pages
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But the holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or duress or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect... | |
| John Delatre Falconbridge - Banking law - 1907 - 736 pages
...due course. Sec. 56. A holder, whether for value or not, who derives his title to Holder in a bill through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a due course, party to any fraud or illegality affecting it, has all the rights of that holder in due... | |
| Nigeria. Compilations - 1908 - 880 pages
...circumstances as amount to a fraud. (3) A holder (whether for value or not), who derives his title to a bill through a holder in due course, and who is not himself...or illegality affecting it, has all the rights of that bolder in due course as regards the acceptor, and all parties to the bill prior to that holder.... | |
| John Jay Crawford - Negotiable instruments - 1908 - 276 pages
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable (a). But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter... | |
| John Jay Crawford - Negotiable instruments - 1908 - 366 pages
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable (a). But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter... | |
| District of Columbia. Court of Appeals - Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 680 pages
...simply because the defendant so states them. 3. A holder of a promissory note who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter;... | |
| |