 But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.  The Law Relating to Cheques - Page 41by Eric Russell Watson - 1902 - 142 pagesFull view - About this book
 | North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Robert Milligan Carothers, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, John McDowell Cochrane, Ames Francis Wilbur, Joseph Coghlan, Edwin James Taylor - Court rules - 1917 - 740 pages
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect to all parties prior to the holder."... | |
 | New Hampshire - Law - 1955 - 1450 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | California - Law - 1957 - 882 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Law - 1936 - 1332 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| |
