 ... the personal representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission. The action must be commenced within...  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Page 598by Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1861Full view - About this book
 | United States - 1909 - 920 pages
...death can not exceed ten thousand (10,000) dollars, and must Inure to the exclusive benefit of thewidow and children, if any. or next of kin, to be distributed in the fcame manner as personal property of the deceased. Approved March 6, 1909. CHAPTER IOC. — Safety... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 1240 pages
...same act or omission. The action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars, and must Inure to the exclusive...distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." Whether the complaint shows on its face that the cause of action is barred by the statute... | |
 | John Henry Wigmore - Torts - 1912 - 1132 pages
...Kansas and Indiana are identical with ours, except that damages are allowed to the extent of §10,000, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin. Mr. Justice Brewer, in Hulbert v. City of Topeka, 34 Fed. 510, referring to the Kansas statute, says... | |
 | Indiana. Appellate Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 824 pages
...same act or omission. The action shall be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars ; and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow, or widower (as the case may be), and children, if any, or next of kin, to be distributed in the same... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 2152 pages
...in the name of the personal representative of the deceased; and the amount recovered will be for the benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin. This action was therefore improperly brought by the widow; and the plaintiff, not having the legal... | |
 | Edson Read Sunderland - Civil procedure - 1913 - 780 pages
...act or omission. The action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed $10,000, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow...distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased. " * * * As we have said, the plaintiff founds her cause of action upon the statute of the... | |
 | Thomas Gaskell Shearman, Amasa Angell Redfield - Negligence - 1913 - 798 pages
...(DASSLER). act or omission. The action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed $10,000 and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow...distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." (General Statutes 1901, § 4871, Code 421). SEC. 6015. Provides that where deceased resided... | |
 | Francis Buchanan Tiffany - Death by wrongful act - 1913 - 734 pages
...husband, as explained in the following section. 1s Where the statute provides that the damages shall inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, if deceased died leaving a widow, but no children, no right of action existed for the benefit of his... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics - Government publications - 1914 - 1228 pages
...shall be commenced within two years. The damages In case of death can not exceed ten thousand (10,000) dollars, and must Inure to the exclusive benefit of...distributed In the same manner as personal property of the deceased. SEC. 28. Any willful neglect, refusal or failure to do the things required to be done by... | |
 | Indiana. Appellate Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1914 - 870 pages
...virtue of §285 Burns 1908, Acts 1899 p. 405, the whole amount of which, by the terms of the statute "must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow...distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." Andrew Graucik left surviving him a widow and one child, who, under §285, supra, were entitled... | |
| |
