 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 992 pages
...to in State v. Mine», 33 W. Va. 126, that "a subsequent statute revising the whole subject matter of a former one and evidently intended as a substitute for it, though it contains no express words to that effect, must, on principles of law as well as in reason... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 1074 pages
...STATUTES — REPEAL — GENERAL REVISION. A subsequent statute revising the whole •nbject-matter of a former one, and evidently Intended as a substitute...it contains no express words to that effect, must operate as a repeal of the former. [Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see vol. 44, Cent. Dig. Statutes,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 1180 pages
...a comprehensive measure, complete in itself, revising the whole subject-matter of the act of 1899. and evidently intended as a substitute for It, although it contains no express words to that effect. In the case of Bartlet et al. v. King, Executor, 12 Mass. 537, 7 Am. Dec. 99, the rule applicable to... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 388 pages
...Act of 1903. We believe the law to be that where a later statute, revising the whole subject matter of a former one and evidently intended as a substitute for it, introduces a new rule on the subject, no imHughe* v. Pulmgren. plication of repeal from the later affirmative... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 1822 pages
...(Gage v. Courrier, 4 Pick. 399; 3 How. USC 636.) 5th. A subsequent statute revising the subject matter of a former one, and evidently intended as a substitute for it, must operate to repeal the former, to the extent to which its provisions are revised. (Commonwealth... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 1324 pages
...18U9, is embraced iu the act of 1907. The rule is that a subsequent statute revising the whole subject of a former one, and evidently intended as a substitute...although it contains no express words to that effect, operates to repeal the former. Smith v. State, 14 Mo. 152; State v. Roller, 77 Mo. 120; State v. Summers,... | |
 | Daniel Roberts, Robert Roberts - Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 854 pages
...properly appear only, from the statute itself. Id. II. REPEAL AND EFFECT THEREOF. & Kepeal by implication. A subsequent statute revising the whole subject-matter...one, and evidently intended as a substitute for it, operates to repeal it, although without express words to that effect. Farr v. Brackclt. 30 Vt. 344;... | |
 | Michigan. Attorney General's Office, Michigan. Department of Attorney General - 1911 - 428 pages
...as it may operate in the connection in which it is re-enacted. "In Bartlet v. King, Dewey, J., said: 'A subsequent statute revising the whole subject-matter...must on principles of law, as well as in reason and common sense, operate to repeal the former.' "Though a subsequent statute be not repugnant in all its... | |
 | James Manford Kerr - Annotations and citations (Law) - 1911 - 714 pages
...Repeal by subsequent statute. — Cited in State v. Lee, 28 Nev. 389, 82 Рас. 230, to point that a subsequent statute, revising the whole subject-matter...it contains no express words to that effect, must operate to repeal the former; Stingle v. Nevel, 9 Ore. 63, to point that subsequent statute repeals... | |
| |
A subsequent statute revising the whole subject-matter of a former one, and evidently intended as a substitute for it, although it contains no express words to that effect, must on principles of law, as well as in reason and common sense, operate to repeal... 
