 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - Constitutional conventions - 1867 - 728 pages
...Buttrick, 7 Mass. R., 142.) The rule is thus laid down in one case, (Bartlett vs. King, 12 Mass. R., 545): A subsequent statute revising the whole subject-matter...intended as a substitute for it, although it contains no express'words to that effect, must, on principles of law, as well as on reason and common sense, operate... | |
 | Andrew Johnson - Impeachments - 1868 - 444 pages
...Bartlett vs. King, (12 Mass., 563,) as follows : "A subsAjuent statute revising the whole subject matter of a former one, and evidently intended as a substitute...contains no express words to that effect, must, on the principles of law, as well as iu reason and common sense, operate to repeal the former." And in... | |
 | Nevada. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1872 - 542 pages
...some of its provisions. "A subsequent statute," said Do\vcy, J., "revising the whole subject matter of a former one, and evidently intended as a substitute...contains no express words to that effect, must, on the principles of law, as well as in reason and common sense, operate to repeal the former." Can there... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1872 - 526 pages
...well-settled rule of law that a subsequent statute, revising the subject matter of a former statute, and evidently intended as a substitute for it, although...it contains no express words to that effect, must operate to repeal the former. Bartlett v. King, 12 Mass. 345. I do not make this point merely for the... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1913 - 674 pages
...Moore v. Vance, 1 Ohio, 10. A subsequent statute revising the whole subjectmatter of the former statute and evidently intended as a substitute for it, although it contains no express words to that effect, operates as a repeal. Lorain Plank Road Co. v. Cotton, 12 Ohio St., 272; State, ex rel., v. Commissioners,... | |
 | Nevada. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1876 - 518 pages
...which passed them. WHEN SURSEQUENT STATUTE REPEALS FORMER OXE. — A subsequent statute revising tho whole subject-matter of a former one, and evidently...substitute for it, although it contains no express vrords to that effect, must, on the principles of law as well as iu reason and common sense, operate... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - Law reports, digests, etc - 1880 - 582 pages
...of 1876, to officers whoso fees were then prescribed in said chapter 20 of the Miscellaneous Laws. " A subsequent statute revising the whole subject-matter...that effect, must, on principles of law, as well as on reason and common sense, operate to repeal the former." (Smith's Stat. and Const. Con., sec. 786;... | |
 | Law - 1883 - 908 pages
...STATUTE. Implied Repeal l>y Revision. — A statute revising the whole subjectmatter of a former statute and evidently intended as a substitute for it, although it contains no express words to that effect, repeals the former: State v. Roller, 77 Mo. SUNDAY. See Negligence. SURETY. For Administrator in Replevin... | |
 | Criminal law - 1897 - 630 pages
...or ignorance, which is altogether inadmissible." In Bartlet v. King, 12 Mass. 537, it was held that: "A subsequent statute, revising the whole subject-matter...must on principles of law, as well as in reason and common sense, operate to repeal the former." In Re New York Institution for Deaf and Dumb, 121 NY 234;... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 1172 pages
...of this court declaring that a subsequent statute revising the whole subject-matter of the former, and evidently intended as a substitute for it, although...it contains no express words to that effect, must operate as a repeal of the former, are cited in support of the contention. This is undoubtedly the... | |
| |
A subsequent statute revising the whole subject-matter of a former one, and evidently intended as a substitute for it, although it contains no express words to that effect, must on principles of law, as well as in reason and common sense, operate to repeal... 
