 | Albert H. Putney - Law - 1908 - 394 pages
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But the holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or duress or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect... | |
 | Albert Hutchinson Putney - Law - 1908 - 396 pages
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But the holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or duress or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect... | |
 | Commercial law - 1909 - 536 pages
...unter beHtimmten Voraussetzungen gleich. BEA sect. 29, 3: „A holder (wether for value or not) who derives his title to a bill through a holder in due...due course as regards the acceptor and all parties prior to that holder." „Ein Inhaber (sei es gegen Entgelt oder nicht), welcher der Nachmann eines... | |
 | New York (State) - Law - 1909 - 926 pages
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | Willis Seaver Paine - Banking law - 1910 - 874 pages
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | James Parker Hall, James De Witt Andrews - Law - 1910 - 484 pages
...its limitations are stated in the NI L. as follows: Sec. 58. ... But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect to all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | James Parker Hall, James De Witt Andrews - Law - 1910 - 484 pages
...its limitations are stated in the NI L. as follows: Sec. 58. ... But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect to all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | Louis Applebome - Admission to the bar - 1910 - 468 pages
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter."... | |
 | Ernest Wilson Huffcut - Negotiable instruments - 1910 - 914 pages
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder 2* who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.25... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 784 pages
...Instrument Law (sec. 1676 — 28, Stats.: Supp. 1906), which provides : "A holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud, duress or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect... | |
| |
In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any... 
