The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8West Publishing Company, 1886 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 64
The plaintiff moved for a new trial, and his motion was granted as to the
defendant D. L. Moulton, and denied as to the defendants Lina and L. F. Moulton.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and order in so far as it denied his motion
for a ...
The plaintiff moved for a new trial, and his motion was granted as to the
defendant D. L. Moulton, and denied as to the defendants Lina and L. F. Moulton.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and order in so far as it denied his motion
for a ...
Page 66
It does not appear why the court below granted the motion for new trial as to the
indorser of the note, and denied it as to the maker. There was no reason for
granting it as to one and not the other, except that defendant Lina was a married
...
It does not appear why the court below granted the motion for new trial as to the
indorser of the note, and denied it as to the maker. There was no reason for
granting it as to one and not the other, except that defendant Lina was a married
...
Page 91
(No. 9,765.) Filed September 29, 1885. PLEADINGS-AMENDMENTS–ABUSE OF
DISCRETION. The allowance of amendments to pleadings is generally in the
discretion of the trial court, but the court is responsible for an abuse of discretion.
(No. 9,765.) Filed September 29, 1885. PLEADINGS-AMENDMENTS–ABUSE OF
DISCRETION. The allowance of amendments to pleadings is generally in the
discretion of the trial court, but the court is responsible for an abuse of discretion.
Page 92
The trial then proceeded. The plaintiff gave evidence tending to show that its
appropriation commenced in the latter part of 1870. The defendant offered to
show that its predecessors' acts of appropriation commenced in July, 1870, and
thus ...
The trial then proceeded. The plaintiff gave evidence tending to show that its
appropriation commenced in the latter part of 1870. The defendant offered to
show that its predecessors' acts of appropriation commenced in July, 1870, and
thus ...
Page 149
Thereupon it filed its motion for a new trial, which was also overruled. Judgment
was entered upon the verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the railroad company
for the full sum of $2,500, and costs. The company excepted to the rulings and ...
Thereupon it filed its motion for a new trial, which was also overruled. Judgment
was entered upon the verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the railroad company
for the full sum of $2,500, and costs. The company excepted to the rulings and ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appeal application assignment attachment attorney authority bond cause charge claim Code complaint concur consideration constitute construction contract corporation court damages deed defendant denied district court duty effect election entered entitled error evidence execution fact favor filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intent interest issued judgment jury Kansas land limitations ment mortgage motion N. W. Rep necessary negligence notice objection offered opinion Osage county owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings proper prove purchase question railroad company reason received record recover referred refused rendered respondent reversed road rule statute sufficient sustained taken term testimony thereof tion trial verdict witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 8 National reporter system: State series The Pacific Reporter, California. Superior Courts |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington Territory. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Kansas. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals, California. District Courts of Appeal |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1886 |
| Original from | University of Minnesota |
| Digitized | 14 Jul 2014 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |