The Pacific Reporter, Volume 230West Publishing Company, 1925 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 19
... the deceased was guilty of it as it approached the place where he was
contributory negligence which was the proxi- at ... in holding that the de[ 4 ]
Negligence as a rule is a question of ceased was , as a matter of law , guilty of
fact for the jury ...
... the deceased was guilty of it as it approached the place where he was
contributory negligence which was the proxi- at ... in holding that the de[ 4 ]
Negligence as a rule is a question of ceased was , as a matter of law , guilty of
fact for the jury ...
Page 21
Criminal law Cu 116612 ( 12 ) — Improper re24 L. R. A. 212. . marks of trial court
during examination of juror , held not prejudicial error , where eviA number of
other authorities might be dence of guilt conclusive . cited , but these are
sufficient ...
Criminal law Cu 116612 ( 12 ) — Improper re24 L. R. A. 212. . marks of trial court
during examination of juror , held not prejudicial error , where eviA number of
other authorities might be dence of guilt conclusive . cited , but these are
sufficient ...
Page 23
for a reversal is that one of the jurors was guilty of misconduct . The appeal in that
case not having been Two witnesses testified positively that the taken within the
statutory time , the motion defendant made the alleged unlawful sale . to dismiss
...
for a reversal is that one of the jurors was guilty of misconduct . The appeal in that
case not having been Two witnesses testified positively that the taken within the
statutory time , the motion defendant made the alleged unlawful sale . to dismiss
...
Page 67
Ordinarily an error committed in overruling a plea of former jeopardy does not
entitle the ( Syllabus by the Court . ) prisoner to a discharge in habeas corpus ,
but Habeas corpus c22 ( 1 ) -One pleading guilty it must be corrected on appeal .
Ordinarily an error committed in overruling a plea of former jeopardy does not
entitle the ( Syllabus by the Court . ) prisoner to a discharge in habeas corpus ,
but Habeas corpus c22 ( 1 ) -One pleading guilty it must be corrected on appeal .
Page 78
51 , 225 P. the jury found the defendant guilty and 1035 . " recommended a
parole . ” It is strongly con[ 2 ] The defendant complains of the ad - tended by the
defendant that the language , mission of the harness in evidence . It was “ That
after ...
51 , 225 P. the jury found the defendant guilty and 1035 . " recommended a
parole . ” It is strongly con[ 2 ] The defendant complains of the ad - tended by the
defendant that the language , mission of the harness in evidence . It was “ That
after ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agreed alleged amount appeal application assigned authority bank bond cause charge claim Code Company condition constitute contention contract conviction Criminal damages decree deed defendant delivered denied determined Digests and Indexes direct district District Court effect entered entitled error escrow evidence executed fact fendant filed findings follows further give given granted ground guilty held instruction interest issue Judge judgment jury Key-Numbered Digests land lease matter ment mortgage motion necessary objection paid parties payment person plaintiff possession present proceedings purchase question reason received record referred refused rendered respondent reversed rule secure statute sufficient Supreme Court sustained taken testimony thereof tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court verdict Wash wife witness
Popular passages
Page 44 - But where the instrument is in the hands of a holder in due course, a valid delivery thereof by all parties prior to him so as to make them liable to him is conclusively presumed.
Page 175 - No special privileges or immunities shall ever be granted which may not be altered, revoked or repealed by the Legislature; nor shall any citizen, or class of citizens, be granted privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not be granted to all citizens.
Page 31 - Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has himself made, authorized or assented to the alteration, and subsequent indorsers.
Page 32 - That it is complete and regular upon its face; 2. That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; 3. That he took it in good faith and for value; 4. That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 370 - All murder which is perpetrated by means of poison, or lying in wait, torture, or by any other kind of willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, or which is committed in the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate arson, rape, robbery, burglary, or mayhem, is murder of the first degree; and all other kinds of murders are of the second degree.
Page 194 - In all other cases, the defendant may be found guilty of any offense the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he is charged in the indictment
Page 356 - ... it depends in each case on the terms of the contract and the circumstances of the case, whether the breach of contract is so material as to justify the injured party in refusing to proceed further...
Page 263 - That carriers while under Federal control shall be subject to all laws and liabilities as common carriers, whether arising under State or Federal laws or at common law, except in so far as may be inconsistent with the provisions of this Act or any other Act applicable to such Federal control or with any order of the President.
Page 71 - Every person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a qualified indorsement, warrants : 1. That the instrument is genuine and in all respects what it purports to be; 2.
Page 205 - ... it seems but reasonable and just that the neighbour who has brought something on his own property which was not naturally there, harmless to others so long as it is confined to his own property...