BAIL. See Appeal. PAGE. liver an article unintentionally left in store, is prima 114 negligenco; depreciation of securities. Whiton v. 236 own use of the proceeds of a note by a bankrupt by 382 136 by holder of unaccepted check not maintainable. 110 posit. First National Bank of Lock Haven v. Mason 412 notes ; negotiable instrument;indorsement by part- 454, 462 ment for customer; custom; current funds; grace. 76 deposited by debtor as his own. Wood v. Boylston 396 alleged bastard child to be exhibited to jury to 43 the lives of their members. State of Missouri v. 427 pons. McGrath v. Van Stavoren (N. Y. C. P.)...... 271 dorsee; entry under second bill; liability of ware- 19 ing bonds in excess of power do not render bonds 118 a reasonable tinio after due. Williamsport Gas Co. 478 See Appeal; Municipal Corporations ; Suretyship. 77 of act of 1851, ch. 122, 8 7. Erie Co. Savings Bank v. 134 ation, what necessary to authorize. Grangers' Ins. CARRIER OF PASSENGERS-Continued. PAGE street railroad resulting from sitting on front plat- form. Wills v. Lynn & B. R. R. Co. (Mass. S. C.) 498 v. Metrop. Dist. Railway Co. (Eng. App.) does not include drinker. Brooks Public Policy. for moneys deposited in proceedings for confiscation. 17 previous assignment for creditors in another State. 354 want of jurisdiction; divorce. Morey v. Morey (Minn. S. C.)..... into State to serve process. Wood v. Wood (Ky. 456 mails and recovered ; trust deed of property stolen. Laws v. Burt (Mass. S. C.)... evidence showing want of jurisdiction. State of 397 man's Trusts (Eng. Ch. D.)..... Farnie (Eng. Pro. and A. D.).... comity – will not be exercised to deprive citizen of 15 not be felony to avoid contract McMahon v. Smith 416 115 goods of consignee at one time, right of action by 355 cation of, by people. Matter of Indiana Constitu- 147 218 217 use ; assessment for sidewalk not. White v. People 116 Houston & Tex. C. R. R. Co. v. Odom (Tex. S. C.) 157 517 owners unconstitutional. Woolever v. Stewart 356 cannot take away property rights from. City of De- 95 moval of dead bodies valid. In re Wong Yung Quy 131 Dock & Imp. Co. v. Trustees of Public Schools 518 removing from office; “misfeasance in office." Com- monwealth v. Williams (Ky, App.) 8 change term and ccmpensation. State ex rel. Martin v. Kalb (Wis. S. C.).. tion. Morley y. Thayer (U.S.C. C., Mass.) valid; New York city. Long v. Mayor (N. Y. App.).. 196 poses. Dyar v. Farmington (Me. S. C.). Federal jurisdiction. Louisville & U. R. R. Co. 274 CARRIER OF ANIMALS. Liability beyond his own line. Stewart v. Terre Haute & Ind. R. R. Co. 423 shipped by consignee of owner; when lien attaches. 417 trusted to him. Dinsmore v. Louisville, New A. & C. 435 3 merchandise as baggage. Pennsylvania Co. v. Miller 223 senger in Pullman car. Pennsylvania Co. v. Koy (U. 510 Interna- must be provided by officers of steamboat. Eagle 116 435 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Continued. PAGE. judgment. State ex rel. Ranger v. New Orleans 496 remedy. Hardin's Adm'r v. Taylor (Ky. App.)...... 457 frontage and area valid. Cleveland v. Tripp (R. I. 316 ing defenses and is valid. Mosby v. St. Louis M. 56 17 tional Banks. tempt in action for divorce. Walker v. Walker (N. 372 juris and publici juris. Ladd y. Southern Cotton P. 157 115 203 subscription. Burr & Hyde v. American S. S. Co. (N. 34 134 parol proof to contradict. Hubbard v. Marshall 338 rescinding of contract. Heckman v. Swartz (Wis. 396 358 358 3 interest in lands; statute of frauds, $ 4; executed consideration. Alderson v. Maddison (Eng. Ex. D.), 419 tion to influence voters. Harvey v. Tama County 18 29 sion dependent on. Clements v. Yturria (N. Y. App.) 155 private messages free of charge, against public 143 212 delivery. Marx v. Ellsworth (Tex. Comin. App.).... 19 Law: Corporations ; Eviction; Firtures; Husbanal Sale; Statute of Frauds; by land-owner, when buildings personal property. 75 to real estate. Detroit & B. C. R. R: Co. v. Burch 198 413 sideration of marriage not voluntary. National 274 not presumption of acceptance of deed. Herring v. 316 does not constitute fraud. Carr v. Breese (N. Y. 337 Jently selling, protected. Beurman v. Van Buren 458 pattern not a piratical copy of an engraving from the same design. Dicks v. Brooks (Eng. App.).... 322 owners ; injunction when will not issue. Scribner 103 picture in ; when does not constitute a breach. PA&E. 134 134 of old ; liability for wrongful issue; dividends. 117 corporation. Lothian v. Wood (Cal. S. C.)... 275 435 bind, and contracts not implied from their declara- 518 new company. Thornton v. Wabash R’y Co. (N. Y. 294 under a forged transfer; estoppel. Sim V. Anglo- 19 over; assignment of stock. Philadelphia & R. C. & 515 38 wrongful issue of certificate. Strange v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. (Tex. S. C.)... tical Society v. London & P. S. Asso. (Eng. App.).... 158 58 Receiver; Taxation. tion allowable, though not existing when action commenced. Howard v. Johnston (N. Y, App.)... 433 out; carrier of goods; liability for damage to goods See Removal of Causes. 352 See Ancient Lights; Lease. dependent on wife's consent; evidence; husband born aster. Egbert v. Greenwalt (Mich. S. C.).. 376 drug ; name of drug need not be stated in indict- 318 332 former conviction. State of Maine v. Littlefield 318 458 276 38 338 criminal act; no implied assent ; unlawful act not of dangerous character. Lamb v. People (III. S. C.). 418 97 by; evidence ; testimony of deceased witness admis- 499 448 75 renders incompetent. People v. Hodgdon (Cal. 275 determine degree of crime. Willis v. Commissioner 176 ion as to guilt. Henze v. People (N. Y. App.)... 433 acts of like character, when admissible. Trogden v. 138 be a" store-keeper" and obtaining goods is guilty 314 PAGE. DELIVERY. What does not constitute; ungathered See Vendor and Purchaser. estoppel; acquiescence. Loud v. Loud (Mass. S.C.), 235 213 518 ance, Life. CRIMINAL LAW-Continued. PAGE. 250 holder of note. State of Iowa v. Davis (Iowa S. C.). 98 must be proven įtlight not evidence of guilt. Fox 218 296 218 vitiate acts of jury; statutory construction. United 318 when it will and when it will not be. State of Con. 458 98 276 176 goods may be indicted together. Commonwealth 235 418 priated is. Ducker v. State (Oregon S. C.).... 182 sale or return not bailee. Krause v. Comm. (Penn. 357 money back at cards; former owner taking posses- 303 aver; pleading Rhode Island v. Hines (R. I. S. C.) 237 band ; husband and wife ; statutory construction. 411 418 removal of cause. State v. Post (U.S. C. C., Ga.). 318 for, without any other punishment. Castro v. Queen 448 "larceny;" idem 80ndns. People v. St. Clair (Cal. 499 convicted when active in crime ; joint indictment of 415 38 98 15 offenders invalid. Flynn v. State (Tex. App.) 357 them error; evidence; foot-prints. Bouldin v. State 237 76 358 against each other as witnesses for prosecution. 443 of exclusion from court room. Hey v. Comm. (Va. 2776 EASEMENTS. How acquired; use having origin in 175 519 quired; evidence of actual notice; notice to agent. See Right of Way. tween houses in close proximity. Falvey v. Elliott (Bull. S. C.) See Adverse Possession. when unconstitutional. Dells v. Kennedy (Wis. S. 43 course by city for purpose of general drainage not v. Mayor (Del. App.).. measure of damages, Central Br. Un. P. R. R. Co. 74 94 Executor ; Former Adjudication : Married Woman, Negotiable Instruments; Suretyship; Usury. contract. Stenbeck v. Latta ( Buff. S. C.)...... committee. Ctursla v. Frieccia (Eng. H. of L.)...... any of testimony competent Board of Education v. Keenan (Cal. S. C.).... condition. Toomes' Estate (Cal. S. C.) counsel for the accused, on the question of his in- sanity State v. Iloyt (Conn. S. C.) joint debtors; declarations by one do not bind others. Wallis v. Randall (N. Y. App.)..... sale not. Flanagan v. Maddin (N. Y. App.)... tioned as to illicit intercourse with others. Smith v. Garagan (Ind. S. C.) tion competent. Fisher y. Green (Ill. S. C.).. ble. O'Connor V. Chicago, M. & St, P. R. Co. (Minn. S. C.).... determined by State law and when not. Pottery Third Nat. Bank (U.S.S. C.). sions. Erickson v. Bell (Iowa S. C.) Conversation ; Criminal Law; Insurance, Life, S; Usage ; Will, Witness, ple v. Morrison (N. Y. S. C.).... cludes; estoppel; practice. Kennedy v. "Crasswell (U.S. S. C.).... Seo Pleading. 54 17 116 DAMAGES. Measure of, in action for waste for min- ing coal. Franklin Coal Co. v. McMillan (Md.)....... 2 Municipal Corporations ; Slander. on money loaned in his hands. Dougherty v. Cen- 338 436 when effective : when question for jury. Jones v. 517 98 nicipal Corporations. 210 HUSBAND AND WIFE - Continued PAGE. 97 of note it was given to secure; jurisdiction. Mers- 316 135 Criminal Law; Married Woman; Mechanics' Lien; PAGE. directly impeached. Barrows v. National Rubber 274 piano are household furniture, and exempt from. 202 to exemption not waived by neglect to claim it. Mc- 262 oner under civil process; "offense," what is, within 470 demanded. State of North Carolina v. Perry (D.C. 513 contract of purchase. Hinkley & E. Iron Co. v. 1:5 115 97 97 of mortgage to foreclose ; payment of judgment by Dougherty v. Remington Paper Co. (N. Y. App.)..... 273 295 to lay track through city; right need not be exclu- 355 road. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. Co. v. Hamblin 516 expectation." Nevill v. Snelling (Eng. Ch. D). ... 503 GAMBLING. Statutory construction; poker not game like faro, keno, etc. Nuckolls v. Comm. (Va. 163 338 463 acceptance; when not transferable. King v. Batter- 203 what does not constitute jurisdiction ; infant sur- Guardianship of Hubbard Infants (N. Y. App.) .... 315 ity in drawing juror does not vitiate acts of jury. See Criminal Law, 95 tion to public. Talbott v. Richmond & D. R. R. Co. 57 ground; use of part of premises for business pur- poses. Hogan v. Manners (Kans. S. C.).......... maintainable between. Hobbs v. Hobbs (Me. S. C.), 73 ity of husband. Biery v. Ziegler (Penn. S. C.). 398 144 59 necessaries; revocation of implied authority. Deben. 436 to pledge his credit for articles suitable to her ICE. See Negligence. Woman; Parent and Chill; Pleading. to restrain another in same court. Mann v. Flower 136 152 419 436 from running cars on rails made, without having See Practice. See Evidence. 317 one negligently causing fire; joinder of parties. Swarthout v. Chicago & N. W. R. R. Co. (Wis. S. C.), 256 be cancelled and note surrendered by agreement of parties. Acker, Rec'r, v. Hite (Penn. S. C.)... 357 257 waiver. Critchett v. American Ins. Co. (Iowa 8. C ), 137 not concealed and actually destroyed, company liable for Austrian case. ance for another's benefit. Reitenbach v. Johnson 375 avoiding policy. Southern Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kloeber 118 ation of insured. Titus v. Glen's Falls Ins. Co. (N.Y. 173 dor and purchaser. Rayner v. Preston (Eng. Ch. D.) 339 403 equity may enforce payment; misrepresentation; 138 256 to mortgagee ; not defeated by mortgagor's of loss, does not avoid policy. Dogge v. Northwest- 118 not. Stupetzki v. Transatlantic F. Ins. Co. (Mich. 256 tion. American Ins. Co. v. Foster (Ill. S. C.). 164 118 compromise of loss; misrepresentations as to owner: ship. Stache v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. (Wis. S. C.) 37 ing induced by epileptic fit. Winspear v. Accident 223 child ; stipulation in policy contravening charter of 479 complying with State laws as to business. Cowardin 37 habitual drunkard, Odd Fellows Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. 82 PAGE Creditor ; Insolvency; Maritime Law. when contract held valid. Crawford v. Scovell See Deed; Statutory Construction. INSURANCE, LIFE-Continued. PAGE. reluctance of courts to enforce forfeitures. Sea- 339 Matter of Attorney-General v. Guardian Mutual Life 393 proceedings to determine priorities; constitutional 394 dings v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. (U. S. 455 479 constitutes. Lawton v. Royal Canadian Ins. Co. 357 but at usual rate. Goodchap v. Roberts (Eng. App.). 218 355 JOINDER. In actions for tort ; release of one party when not release of others. Ellis v. Essau (Wis. 339 57 431 115 tendment. Chappell v. Truscott (Buff. S. C.). 115 risdiction; Practice. river; Federal question. Schoonmaker v. Gilmore 434 pal bond; acknowledgment of indebtedness. Porter 435 an assignee when Circuit Court has no jurisdiction. 441 489 parties, removal of cause from State court depend- 434 302 time torts. Brown y. Gilmore (Penn. S. C.)... ... 338 leasing railroad in another, not citizen of latter 497 Practice ; Waiver. See Criminal Law. 103 97 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. Ground of; what must be shown; failure of prosecution. Thaule v. 114 Western R. R. Co. v. DeGrail (Minn, S. C.).. cific examination of claim. People ex rel. Thurston 978 fully passing over defendants' land; statutory con- 283 admiralty jurisdiction. Town of Pelham v. Schooner 316 sponsible; authority of master; nature of instru. 135 216 257 77 nished after launching, a land contract and lien App.).. ment. Worth v. Steamboat (U. S. D. C., Mo.). 219 498 save property. Scaramanga v. Stamp (Eng. App.). 3:9 497 274 sanguinity; nephew and aunt; conflict of law. Campbell v. Crampton (U. S. C. C., N. Y.).... 403 promise. Ditchain v. Worrall (Eng. C. P. D.). 419 sideration. Nat. Exchange Bank v. Watson (R. I. S. C.)...... provided in statute, when no marriage. Common- 301 countries, and on ship crossing English channel ; 301 Kerrison (N. Y. Spec. Term).. 303 of foreign law; presumptions; evidence. Hynes v. 367 man, which she is not bound to pay, will prove a suffi- 398 117 when need not be during coverture : estoppel ; in- fant not bound by. Sims v. Everhardt (U. S. S. C.), 455 made on husband's credit. Holmes v. Bronson (Mich. 198 mode ; estoppel. Innis v. Templeton (Pepn. S. C.). 502 LARCENY. See Criminal Law. what is an assessment. Budd v. Marshall (Eng. 257 38 verxation. 303, 377 6.- May be entitled to compensation for services per- formed in husband's family. Mason v. Dunbar (Mich. S. C.).. itations. |