Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, Volume 38 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 86
Page 33
... contended that the latter questions were proper as affecting appellant's credibil- ity , or the weight that should be given to his testimony . The cross - examination , therefore , came within the rule announced in State v . Shockley ...
... contended that the latter questions were proper as affecting appellant's credibil- ity , or the weight that should be given to his testimony . The cross - examination , therefore , came within the rule announced in State v . Shockley ...
Page 36
... contends that the error in the Shockley Case consists in holding that the facts sought to be elicited by the questions of the district attorney were proper upon the ground that they tended to affect the credibility of the accused as a ...
... contends that the error in the Shockley Case consists in holding that the facts sought to be elicited by the questions of the district attorney were proper upon the ground that they tended to affect the credibility of the accused as a ...
Page 48
... contended by the state that it is demonstrated that the deceased died of mercurial poisoning , and that the poison was administered to her by the defendant at about noon on the 27th day of November , when he stood at the doorway of , or ...
... contended by the state that it is demonstrated that the deceased died of mercurial poisoning , and that the poison was administered to her by the defendant at about noon on the 27th day of November , when he stood at the doorway of , or ...
Page 50
... contended for by the state that " as to the poisoning it was necessary on the part of the state to satisfy the jury of two things : First , that the defendant had possession of , or access to the poison ; sec- ond , that he had the ...
... contended for by the state that " as to the poisoning it was necessary on the part of the state to satisfy the jury of two things : First , that the defendant had possession of , or access to the poison ; sec- ond , that he had the ...
Page 59
... contended that the court had not acquired jurisdiction of it nor of the res - the debt . We held that , while the court had obtained jurisdiction of the garnishee , it had nevertheless not obtained jurisdiction of BRISTOL V. Brent . 59.
... contended that the court had not acquired jurisdiction of it nor of the res - the debt . We held that , while the court had obtained jurisdiction of the garnishee , it had nevertheless not obtained jurisdiction of BRISTOL V. Brent . 59.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission affidavit aforesaid alleged amount answer appellant appellant's application attorney authority bank braking Carbon County cause certificate charged claim clerk Comp complaint consideration contended contract corporation counsel deceased default defendant district court duty effect engine entered error evidence facts fifty dollars filed findings foregoing garnishee Heber City held injury issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury Larsen last clear chance license Logan City Madge Morey mandamus Matsch McCornick ment motion Naylor negligence Nelson paid parties payment person plaintiff pleadings poison premium proceeding promissory note question railroad reason record recover refused respondent rule Salt Lake City Sanpete County sexual intercourse statement statute stockholders stop STRAUP Success Company Success Mining Company sufficient testified testimony thereof thousand dollars tion train transaction trial Utah verdict waiver witness writ of certiorari writ of mandate
Popular passages
Page 119 - ... with the secretary of the interior a copy of its articles of incorporation, and due proofs of its organization under the same...
Page 179 - ... for money had and received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff...
Page 284 - In giving the decision, the facts found and the conclusions of law must be separately stated. Judgment upon the decision must be entered accordingly.
Page 119 - That any railroad company desiring to secure the benefits of this act, shall, within twelve months after the location of any section of twenty miles of Its road, If the same be upon surveyed lands, and, If upon unsurveyed lands, within twelve months after the survey thereof by the United States, file with the register of the land office for the district where such land Is located a profile of Its road...
Page 352 - Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as holder in due course.
Page 278 - The writ of mandamus may be denominated the writ of mandate. § 1085. It .may be issued by any court, except a justice's or police court, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station...
Page 352 - That it is complete and regular upon its face; 2. That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; 3. That he took it in good faith and for value; 4. That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 55 - Every person guilty of murder in the first degree shall suffer death, or confinement in the state prison for life, at the discretion of the jury trying the same; or, upon plea of guilty, the court shall determine the same; and every person guilty of murder in the second degree is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not less than ten years...
Page 71 - Attachment is the creature of the local law; that is, unless there is a law of the state providing for and permitting the attachment, it cannot be levied there. If there be a law of the state providing for the attachment of the debt, then, if the garnishee be found in that state, and process be personally served upon him therein, we think the court thereby acquires jurisdiction over him, and can garnish the debt due from him to the debtor of the plaintiff, and condemn it, provided the garnishee could...
Page 160 - There is no inherent right in a citizen to thus sell intoxicating liquors by retail ; it is not a privilege of a citizen of the State or of a citizen of the United States.