Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin, Volume 130 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page vi
... Appeal to circuit court : Procedure : Estoppel : Trial de novo : Appearance by attorney : Jurisdiction . Bower City Mut . Fire Ins . Co. , Waukau Milling Co. v ... 47 Boyle , Fogo v ..... 154 Bradley , Clark & Co. , Kohl v .. 301 Breed ...
... Appeal to circuit court : Procedure : Estoppel : Trial de novo : Appearance by attorney : Jurisdiction . Bower City Mut . Fire Ins . Co. , Waukau Milling Co. v ... 47 Boyle , Fogo v ..... 154 Bradley , Clark & Co. , Kohl v .. 301 Breed ...
Page vii
... Appeal and error : Findings : Conclusiveness : Practice : Eject- ment : Adverse possession : Limitation of actions : Privity of , possession : Tacking : Presumptions : Burden of proof . Clyde , Town of , State ex rel . Limmix v ...
... Appeal and error : Findings : Conclusiveness : Practice : Eject- ment : Adverse possession : Limitation of actions : Privity of , possession : Tacking : Presumptions : Burden of proof . Clyde , Town of , State ex rel . Limmix v ...
Page viii
... Appeal and error : New trial on reversal . 1 Elholm , Petersen v ..... Evans v . Crawford County Farmers ' Mut . Fire Ins . Co. 189 Vendor and purchaser : Transfer of title by operation of law , when takes effect : Same , as to third ...
... Appeal and error : New trial on reversal . 1 Elholm , Petersen v ..... Evans v . Crawford County Farmers ' Mut . Fire Ins . Co. 189 Vendor and purchaser : Transfer of title by operation of law , when takes effect : Same , as to third ...
Page ix
... Appeal and error : Review : Absence of exceptions : Malicious pros- ecution : Probable cause : Evidence : Questions for jury : De- fenses : Reliance on advice of counsel : Court and jury : Excess- ive damages . Hadtke v . Grzyll ...
... Appeal and error : Review : Absence of exceptions : Malicious pros- ecution : Probable cause : Evidence : Questions for jury : De- fenses : Reliance on advice of counsel : Court and jury : Excess- ive damages . Hadtke v . Grzyll ...
Page x
... Appeal and error : Prejudicial error : Principal and agent : Delegation to a subagent . Jones , State v ... Jost v . Wolf .. 492 572 37 Appeal and error : Findings , when disturbed : Varying written contracts : Parol evidence ...
... Appeal and error : Prejudicial error : Principal and agent : Delegation to a subagent . Jones , State v ... Jost v . Wolf .. 492 572 37 Appeal and error : Findings , when disturbed : Varying written contracts : Parol evidence ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ACCORD AND SATISFACTION affirmed agent agreement alleged amended amount Anna answer Appeal and error assessment attorney authority Burgor CASSODAY cause of action certificate charge circuit court Circuit Judge circumstances claim commenced complaint contract contributory negligence conveyance corporation costs counsel county court court of equity Crawford County damages defective defendant defendant's demurrer effect engine equity evidence ex rel fact fendant findings fraud handcar held highway horse Ibid injury instructions interest John Arpin joint tenancy judgment jurisdiction jury land liability ment Milwaukee ne exeat negligence oral argument owner paid parties payment person petition plaint plaintiff plaintiff in error pleaded possession premises Price County proceedings proof purchase question RAY STEVENS reason recover respondent Sauk county Stats statute sufficient tax deed tenant testimony thereof thereto tion town transaction trial court warranty Waukau William Bergenthal Wisconsin writ
Popular passages
Page 132 - ... five per centum on the value of the taxable property therein, to be .ascertained by the last assessment for State and county taxes, previous to the incurring of such indebtedness.
Page 337 - Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course.
Page 334 - A holder in due course is a holder who has taken the instrument under the following conditions: (1) That it is complete and regular upon its face; (2) That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; (3) That he took it in good faith and for value; (4) That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 51 - This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy...
Page 412 - A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all of his provable debts, except such as (1) are due as a tax levied by the United States, the State, county, district, or municipality in which he resides; (2) are liabilities for obtaining property by false pretenses or false representations, or for willful and malicious injuries to the person or property of another...
Page 198 - True, the general rule is that a principal is bound by the acts of his agent within the scope...
Page 511 - ... before the expiration of the time limited for the commencement thereof, and the cause of action survive, an action may be commenced by his representatives, after the expiration of that time and within one year from his death.
Page 52 - ... as may fairly be said to have been within the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made as attending the use of the insured property.
Page 335 - The title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective within the meaning of this act when he obtained the instrument, or any signature thereto, by fraud, duress, or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud.
Page 264 - The contestants of the claim, the plaintiffs in the present action, appealed to the supreme court, where the judgment of the circuit court was reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the judgment of the county court disallowing the entire claim be affirmed.