The Pacific Reporter, Volume 155West Publishing Company, 1916 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 31
The defendant's father , J. W. Creager , the motion for a new trial no testimony whatwho was the Union Pacific fireman , recalled ever was offered showing or tending to show no such train on that date . There was ex- that all the ...
The defendant's father , J. W. Creager , the motion for a new trial no testimony whatwho was the Union Pacific fireman , recalled ever was offered showing or tending to show no such train on that date . There was ex- that all the ...
Page 32
hearing of the motion for a new trial is mere- tion self - sustaining declarations of defendant ly cumulative to the testimony which was as to his denying the alleged relation with produced concerning the main issue .
hearing of the motion for a new trial is mere- tion self - sustaining declarations of defendant ly cumulative to the testimony which was as to his denying the alleged relation with produced concerning the main issue .
Page 33
In not granting a new trial the testimony being transcribed and filed . ” because of surprise , and particularly bePerfectly legitimate cross - examination un- cause of not getting Esther Forsberg as a der elementary rules . witness .
In not granting a new trial the testimony being transcribed and filed . ” because of surprise , and particularly bePerfectly legitimate cross - examination un- cause of not getting Esther Forsberg as a der elementary rules . witness .
Page 36
Under the testimony it cannot be BY INSTRUCTIONS . said to be an impossibility for igniting The admission of testimony which is not sparks and cinders to be carried the distance competent for one purpose , but is admissible on mentioned ...
Under the testimony it cannot be BY INSTRUCTIONS . said to be an impossibility for igniting The admission of testimony which is not sparks and cinders to be carried the distance competent for one purpose , but is admissible on mentioned ...
Page 37
All the Justices conoffered testimony for any purpose , it must be curring . held under all the evidence in the case that the exclusion of the offered testimony was not material error . ROSS et al . v . HOLMAN . ( No. 20117. ) ...
All the Justices conoffered testimony for any purpose , it must be curring . held under all the evidence in the case that the exclusion of the offered testimony was not material error . ROSS et al . v . HOLMAN . ( No. 20117. ) ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adverse possession affirmed agreed agreement alleged amount answer appeal applied authority bank bond cause Cent charge claim Code complaint condition consideration considered Constitution contention contract corporation damages decree deed defendant denied determine direct District Court duty effect entered entitled error evidence facts failed fendant filed follows further give given ground held injury instruction intention interest issue Judge judgment jury KEY-NUMBER land matter meaning ment motion necessary negligence Note.-For objection operation opinion owner paid party payment person petition plain plaintiff pleadings possession present proceedings purchase question reason record recover reference respondent result rule statute street sufficient suit Supreme Court sustained testified testimony thereof tion trial verdict Wash witness