155 P. 367. "Public purpose."-Lewis and Clark County v. "Taking."-Kurtz v. Southern Pac. Co. (Or.) Industrial Acc. Board of Montana (Mont.) 155 P. 268. "Public school."-Litchman v. Shannon (Wash.) 155 P. 783. "Public use."-Blackwell Lumber Co. v. Empire Mill Co. (Idaho) 155 P. 680. "Public utility vehicle."-Cummins v. Jones (Or.) 155 P. 171. "Tax."-State v. Emerson (Wash.) 155 P. 579. "To the rear."-Wood v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp. (Cal.) 155 P. 68. "Undue influence."-Black v. Funk (Kan.) 155 P. 959. "Unlawful consideration."-Davis v. Janeway (Okl.) 155 P. 241. V. "Unsafe or dangerous place."-Melkusch Victor American Fuel Co. (N. M.) 155 P. 727. "Purchaser pendente lite."-Wilson v. Robinson (N. M.) 155 P. 732. "Railroad property."-Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. King County (Wash.) 155 P. 416. "Rape."-Callaghan v. State (Ariz.) 155 P. 308. "Ratification."-St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Leger Mill Co. (Okl.) 155 P. 599. "Ratify."-Snook v. Page (Cal. App.) 155 P. "Warranty."-International Harvester Co. V. 107. "Usually cultivated or improved."-Trask v. Success Mining Co. (Idaho) 155 P. 288. "Waiver."-Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Ward (Okl.) 155 P. 524. Lawyer (Okl.) 155 P. 617. "Real property."-McMurran v. Duncan (Ariz.) | "Work."-Arnhold v. Klug (Kan.) 155 P. 805. 155 P. 306. "Workhouses."-Singleton v. Hamilton (Wash.) 155 P. 1057. "Regulation and control of the state."-Blackwell Lumber Co. v. Empire Mill Co. (Idaho) 155 P. 680. "Representative."-Amann v. Pantages (Wash.) 155 P. 1070. "Residuary bequest."-In re Hartung's Estate (Nev.) 155 P. 353. "Residuary_legatee."-In re Hartung's Estate (Nev.) 155 P. 353. "Residue."-In re Hartung's Estate (Nev.) 155 P. 353. "Resulting trust."-Belcher v. Young (Wash.) 155 P. 1060. "Right to real property."-Imperial Water Co. No. 1 v. Wores (Cal. App.) 155 P. 124. "Sale of realty."-Cabin Valley Mining Co. v. Hall (Okl.) 155 P. 570. "Sales."-Johnson v. Dixon Farms Co. (Cal. App.) 155 P. 134; Carpenter v. Roach (Ökl.) 155 P. 237. "School."-Litchman v. Shannon (Wash.) 155 P. "Workman."-Lewis and Clark County. v. Industrial Acc. Board of Montana (Mont.) 153 P. 268. WORK AND LABOR. See Mechanics' Liens. 7(2) (Wash.) Where plaintiff took his moth er from a sanitarium in Illinois to his home in Seattle, held, that contract by his father to pay for her board and support could not be implied. -Olsen v. Olsen, 155 P. 747. Suits by a child against a parent for support are not favored, and the presumption is that a parent domiciled in the home of a child is there by invitation, and that services rendered are prompted by love and filial duty.-Id. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT. See Constitutional Law, 208; Master and Servant, 162, 872, 348-401; States, 119; Statutes, 114; Taxation, WRIT OF ERROR. 3S. For cases in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER 149 593 425 149 150 53 436 Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. Pg. Vol. Pg. 150 356 674 151 145 828 541 150 769 683 151 127 150 58 557 453 690 Carabin v. Wilhelm (151 P. 87) 702 Laberee v. Root (151 P. 245). Martin v. Northern Pac. R. Co. (151 P. 52 Kennedy v. Canadian Pac. R. Co. (151 P. 252) 134 58 146 458 592 284 396 248 .... Maxwell v. Smith (152 P. 530). 91 629 |