 | United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - Court rules - 1812 - 486 pages
...rejecting such other construction, and for adhering to their obvious meaning. To enable this court, then, to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise of appellate jurisdiction, or to be necessary to enable them to exercise appellate jurisdiction. It has been stated at the bar that... | |
 | James Kent - Law - 1832 - 590 pages
...be original, nor original jurisdiction where the constitution had declared it should be appellate. To enable the court to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be 1 Cranck, 137. an exercise, or necessary to an exercise, of appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court... | |
 | John Marshall - Constitutional law - 1839 - 762 pages
...rejecting such other construction, and for adhering to their obvious meaning. To enable this court, then, to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise of appellate jurisdiction, or to be necessary to enable them to exercise appellate jurisdiction. It has been stated at the bar that... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1851 - 672 pages
...the section above referred to, of the constitution of the United States, came up before the supreme court, is that of Marbury v. Madison, (1 Cranch, 137.)...in exercising its appellate jurisdiction, issue a mandaimis to other courts, yet to issue such writ to an officer for the delivery of a paper, such as... | |
 | James Kent - Law - 1851 - 706 pages
...be original, nor original jurisdiction where the constitution had declared it should be appellate. To enable the court to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise, or *necessary to an *323 exercise, of appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court may accordingly issue... | |
 | George Ticknor Curtis - Constitutional law - 1854 - 674 pages
...rejecting such other construction, and for adhering to their obvious meaning. " To enable this court, then, to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise of appellate jurisdiction, or to be necessary to enable them to exercise appellate jurisdiction. " It has been stated at the bar,... | |
 | James Kent - Law - 1858 - 732 pages
...How. R. 92. Sce, also, Rceside v. Walker, 11 How. US 272. United States v. Guthrie, 17 How. US 284. the court to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an *323 exercise, or *necessary to an exercise, of appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court may accordingly... | |
 | James Kent - Law - 1860 - 748 pages
...How. R. 92. See, also, Reeside v. Walker, 11 How. US 272. United States v. Guthrie, 17 How. US 284. the court to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise, or * necessary to an exercise, of appellate juris- * 323 diction. The Supreme Court may accordingly... | |
 | John Fulton - Constitutional history - 1864 - 582 pages
...rejecting such otl$er construction, and for adhering to their obvious meaning. "To enable this court then to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise of appellate jurisdiction or to be necessary to enable them to exercise appellate jurisdiction. 4 'It has been stated, at the bar,... | |
 | Thomas Harvey Coldwell - Law reports, digests, etc - 1870 - 790 pages
...repeatedly exercised jurisdiction of this writ. But it has been held that, to enable that court to issue mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise of appellate jurisdiction, or to be necessary to enable it to exercise appellate jurisdiction, and not original: Moses on Mandamus,... | |
| |
To enable this court then to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise of appellate jurisdiction, or to be necessary to enable them to exercise appellate jurisdiction. 
