Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1872 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 57
Page 10
... June 11 , 1870. Kenyon proves his invention back to 1866. The patentee files no testimony , relying apparently upon the rejection of Kenyon's application on the ground of forfeiture for laches , a principle fully recognized by the ...
... June 11 , 1870. Kenyon proves his invention back to 1866. The patentee files no testimony , relying apparently upon the rejection of Kenyon's application on the ground of forfeiture for laches , a principle fully recognized by the ...
Page 35
... June , to the machine shop of Lincoln & Graham , to have certain manifest defects in it remedied . From Gra- ham's testimony it is plain that he was employed simply as a skilled artisan to carry out the inventor's ideas , and to this ...
... June , to the machine shop of Lincoln & Graham , to have certain manifest defects in it remedied . From Gra- ham's testimony it is plain that he was employed simply as a skilled artisan to carry out the inventor's ideas , and to this ...
Page 37
... June of that year , still if it appears that Knight used due diligence in perfecting her invention and seeking protection for the same , she is not to be deprived of the fruits of her skill and labor by the fact that a patent has ...
... June of that year , still if it appears that Knight used due diligence in perfecting her invention and seeking protection for the same , she is not to be deprived of the fruits of her skill and labor by the fact that a patent has ...
Page 59
... June 11 , 1867 . The decision of the examiners - in - chief is affirmed . JASON A. BIDWELL . APPEAL FROM EXAMINERS - IN - CHIEF . March 4 , 1871 . In the matter of the application of Jason A. Bidwell for letters - patent for an IMPROVED ...
... June 11 , 1867 . The decision of the examiners - in - chief is affirmed . JASON A. BIDWELL . APPEAL FROM EXAMINERS - IN - CHIEF . March 4 , 1871 . In the matter of the application of Jason A. Bidwell for letters - patent for an IMPROVED ...
Page 74
... June 10 , 1857 , resulting in the issue of a patent December 1 , 1857 . " The three patents have been joined in proceedings of the inventor thereunder , no distinction having been made among them in the grant of licenses , & c .; and he ...
... June 10 , 1857 , resulting in the issue of a patent December 1 , 1857 . " The three patents have been joined in proceedings of the inventor thereunder , no distinction having been made among them in the grant of licenses , & c .; and he ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abandonment Acting Commissioner affidavits alleged amended APPEAL FROM EXAMINERS-IN-CHIEF APPEAL FROM PRIMARY applicant's application as follows arrangement article of manufacture assignees attached attorney August 11 bloomery board of appeals board of examiners-in-chief caveat combination Commissioner's Decisions connection construction courts Crane & Rogers design patent device diligence drawing DUNCAN Dunderdale entitled evidence examiner's extension of letters-patent fact favor February February 24 fully furnace granted Hermance interference introduced invention issued June June 9 LEGGETT letters patent Lowthorp machine March 17 matter means mechanism ment metal mode novelty November 29 object obtained operation original parties patent for IMPROVEMENT patent law Patent Office pencil perfected placed plate platform practice primary examiner priority produced provided in section Pugh purpose question reason received reference regarded reissue reissue application rejected remuneration reservoir rivet rubber rule says secured shown shows specification statement testimony tion trade-mark Withington words
Popular passages
Page 235 - ... and praying protection of his right until he shall have matured his invention. Such caveat shall be filed in the confidential archives of the office and preserved in secrecy, and shall be operative for the term of one year from the filing thereof.
Page 141 - That the law arising upon the case was, that if an inventor makes his discovery public, looks on and permits others freely to use it, without objection or assertion of claim to the invention, of which the public might take notice ; he abandons the inchoate right to the exclusive use of the invention, to which a patent would have entitled him had it been applied for before such use. And...
Page 162 - ... no new matter shall be introduced into the specification, nor in case of a machine patent shall the model or drawings be amended, except each by the other; but when there is neither model nor drawing, amendments may be made upon proof satisfactory to the commissioner that such new matter or amendment was a part of the original invention, and was omitted from the specification by inadvertence, accident, or mistake, as aforesaid.
Page 250 - ... any person who, by his own industry, genius, efforts, and expense, has invented and produced any new and original design for a manufacture, bust, statue, alto-relievo, or bas-relief; any new and original design for the printing of woolen, silk, cotton, or other fabrics, any new and original impression, ornament, pattern, print, or picture to be printed, paiuted, cast, or otherwise placed on or worked into any article of manufacture...
Page 240 - To make a valid claim for a combination, it is not necessary that the several elementary parts of the combination should act simultaneously. If those elementary parts are so arranged that the successive action of each contributes to produce some one practical result, which result, when attained, is the product of the simultaneous or successive action of all the elementary parts, viewed as one entire whole, a valid claim for thus combining those elementary parts may be made.
Page 135 - ... many experiments may have been unsuccessfully tried, coming very near, yet falling short of the desired result. They have produced nothing beneficial. The invention, when perfected, may truly be said to be the culminating point of many experiments, not only by the inventor, but by many others. He may have profited indirectly by the unsuccessful experiments and failures of others; but it gives them no right to claim a share of the honor or the profit of the successful inventor.
Page 78 - Admissions, whether of law or of fact, which have been acted upon by others, are conclusive against the party making them, in all cases between him and the person whose conduct he has thus influenced.
Page 228 - ... or by reason of the patentee claiming as his invention or discovery more than he had a right to claim as new, the original patent is inoperative or invalid, provided the error has arisen from inadvertence, accident, or mistake, and without any fraudulent or deceptive intention.
Page 61 - ... upon failure of the applicant to prosecute the same within one year after any action therein, of which notice shall have been given to the applicant, they shall be regarded as abandoned by the parties thereto, unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Patents that such delay was unavoidable...
Page 208 - It is difficult, perhaps impossible, to lay down any general rule by which to determine when a given invention or improvements shall be embraced in one, two, or morn patents. Some discretion must necessarily be left on this subject to the head of the Patent Office. It. is often a nice and perplexing question.