Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 98 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 60
Page 2
... Limitations of that State did not run in favor of the plaintiff , by reason of his own and his grantors ' possession , so as to transfer to him a title which could be asserted against the record title of the defendant . ERROR to the ...
... Limitations of that State did not run in favor of the plaintiff , by reason of his own and his grantors ' possession , so as to transfer to him a title which could be asserted against the record title of the defendant . ERROR to the ...
Page 8
... Limitations have not run in favor of the plaintiff , by reason of his own and his grantor's posses- sion , from 1851 or 1852 to May 8 , 1867 , and that such possession gives him no title as against defendants . " Judgment having been ...
... Limitations have not run in favor of the plaintiff , by reason of his own and his grantor's posses- sion , from 1851 or 1852 to May 8 , 1867 , and that such possession gives him no title as against defendants . " Judgment having been ...
Page 10
... Limitations vested in him a title which he could affirmatively assert against any adverse right or claim . Shelly v . Guy , 11 Wheat . 370 ; Pendleton v . Alexander , 8 Cranch , 469 ; Leffingwell v . Warren , 2 Black , 605 ; Bradstreet ...
... Limitations vested in him a title which he could affirmatively assert against any adverse right or claim . Shelly v . Guy , 11 Wheat . 370 ; Pendleton v . Alexander , 8 Cranch , 469 ; Leffingwell v . Warren , 2 Black , 605 ; Bradstreet ...
Page 11
... Limitations ? These questions will be considered in their order . 1. As to the admissibility of the evidence . The point of the inquiry is whether the record of alcalde grants of the pueblo lands of San Francisco , kept by the alcalde ...
... Limitations ? These questions will be considered in their order . 1. As to the admissibility of the evidence . The point of the inquiry is whether the record of alcalde grants of the pueblo lands of San Francisco , kept by the alcalde ...
Page 16
... Limitations . The nature of the title of San Francisco to her pueblo lands has often been the subject of consideration in this court , and was carefully stated by Mr. Justice Field in Townsend v . Grce- ley , 5 Wall . 326 , and Grisar v ...
... Limitations . The nature of the title of San Francisco to her pueblo lands has often been the subject of consideration in this court , and was carefully stated by Mr. Justice Field in Townsend v . Grce- ley , 5 Wall . 326 , and Grisar v ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of Congress action affirmed alleged amount appears assignment attorney Attorney-General authority bank bankruptcy bonds certificate charge charter Circuit Court claim commissioners complainant Constitution contract conveyance conveyed corporation court of equity creditors debt decision declared decree deed defendant delivered the opinion demurrer District Court duty entitled equity evidence executed facts filed fraud grant held Hooper & Co Insurance interest invention issued judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE land land-office matter ment nitro-glycerine offence officers original paid parties patent payment pension persons petition plaintiff in error possession probable cause proceedings purpose question Railroad Company record recover reissued road rule Schuyler County sect secure Stat Statute of Limitations Stephen Jumel suit Supreme Court survey thereof tion tract Treasury trial Union Pacific Railroad United valid White River writ of error
Popular passages
Page 297 - By the law of the land is most clearly intended the general law; a law which hears before it condemns; which proceeds upon inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial.
Page 166 - American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.
Page 337 - An act [to amend an act entitled an act] to aid in the construction of a railroad and telegraph line from the Missouri River to the Pacific Ocean, and to secure to the Government the use of the same for postal, military, and other purposes, approved July first, eighteen hundred and sixty-two," approved July second, eighteen hundred and sixty-four.
Page 35 - ... in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years...
Page 559 - The taking, receiving, reserving, or charging a rate of interest greater than is allowed by the preceding section, when knowingly done, shall be deemed a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill, or other evidence of debt carries with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon.
Page 101 - The General Assembly shall not authorize any county, city, or town to become a stockholder in or to loan its credit to any company, association, or corporation, unless two-thirds of the qualified voters of such county, city, or town, at a regular or special election to be held therein, shall assent thereto.
Page 492 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 95 - And the said applicant hereby covenants and agrees to and with said company that the foregoing is a just, full, and true exposition of all the facts and circumstances in regard to the condition, situation, value, and risk of the property to be insured, so far as the same are known to the applicant, and are material to the risk.
Page 357 - ... shall be exempt from taxation, shall be exempt from the claims of creditors, and shall not be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable process whatever, either before or after receipt by the beneficiary.
Page 114 - No department of the Government shall expend, in any one fiscal year, any sum in excess of appropriations made by Congress for that fiscal year, or involve the Government in any contract for the future payment of money in excess of such appropriations.