Page images
PDF
EPUB

K.

Kalt v. Lignot,

382 Kelly v. Page,

697 Kendrick v. Kimball,

399 Kennebeck Co. v. Augusta Ins. & Banking Co.

45 Kimball v. Rowland,

L. Landaff s Petition,

292 Lang v. Evans,

696 Langdon v. Lord,

566 v. Ratland,

629 Langmaid r. Puffer,

587 Lanphier v. Worcester and Nashua R. R. Co.

400 Lawrence v. Dewey,

212 Lawson v. Bank of London, 223 r. Carr,

100 Leach v. Kimball,

6889 Lee v. Kane,

439 Lewis v. Bolitho,

51 8. Eagle Ins. Co. 532 Liddel v. Norton,

108 Liddle o. Mulligan,

580 Lindsay v. United States, 21 Littleton v. Richardson, 690 Livingston v. Pendergast, 644 Loring v. Otis,

535 v. Park,

443 Lyman v. Tarbell,

706 Lynch v. Cronan,

440 Lyndon v. Danville,

525 Lyon v. Williams,

42

McGilvery v. Capen,

535 McGregor v. Rhodes,

165 McMullen v. Riley,

439 McQuesten v. Morgan, 631 Mead v. Merrill,

397 Mechanics Bank v. New York

& New Haven R. R. Co. 266 Melvin v. Fellows,

289 Mennie v. Blake,

357 Methodist Episcopal Church v. Barker,

447 Michigan State Bank v. Leavenworth's Estate,

527

v. Leavenworth,

568

v. Peck, 527 Miles v. Roberts,

345 Mitchell v. Dyer,

50 Mohney v. Cook,

151 Molineaux v. Coburn,

47 Molyneaux v. Rowe,

225 Monson v. Williams,

412 Montpelier v East Montpelier, 528 Morrill v. Foster,

394 Morrison v. New Bedford Institute for Savings,

583 Morrow v. Willard,

624 Morse v. Cross,

671 Morss v. Shannon, Moses v. Boston & Maine R. R. Co.

282 Moss v. Hinds,

211 v. Thorniley,

164 Moulton v. Parker & Young, 693 Mowry v. Chessman,

441 Mulry v. Mowhawk Valley Ins. Co.

41 Mumford Oxford, &c., Railway Co.

159 Munger v. Munger,

293 Munroe v. Merrill,

51

384

M.

v.

[ocr errors]

Magruder v. United States, 138 Main v. Warner,

151 Manchester & Lawrence R. R. Co. v. Fisk,

394 Manly v. Slason,

459 Mansir v. Crosby,

408 Marquand v. Banner,

160 Mariin v. Bailey,

152 Martineau v Rogers,

220 Marvin v. Wallis,

228 Mather v. Fraser,

106 McCabe v. Bellows,

698 McCracken v. Dargan, 517 McDougall v. Calef,

642 McFadden v. Burns,

51 McFarland v. Chase,

588

Nary v. Potter,

408 Nelson v. Nelson,

411 Newry & Enniskillen Rail

way Co. v. Ulster Railway
Co.

513 Nichols v. Suncook Manufacturing Co.

575 Nicholson v. United States, 20 Norton v. Bazett,

519 Noyes v. Smith,

469

Nutting v. Herbert,

692 Nye v. Marion School District, 583

Probate Court v. Banfil, Prowett v. Mortimer, Puckett v. United States, Putnam v. Bixby,

v. Mellen, Pybus v. Gibbs,

469 222

18 440 338 517

[blocks in formation]

407

P. Page v. Hubbard,

607 v. Olcutt,

470 Palmer's Case,

121 Palmer v. Fowley,

46 v. Ward, Parker v. McKean,

577 v. Midland Railway Co.

169 Patch v. Keeler,

460 Patchin v. Stroud,

214 Patten v. Moore,

400 Paul v. Carver,

150 v. Hartland,

463 Payne v. Ridgway,

451 Peabody v. Bloomer,

277 Pearce v. Pearce,

514 Peirce v. Gray,

700 Pellew v. Horsford,

221 Pembroke Iron Co. v. Parsons, 48 Pendleton v. Empire Stone Dressing Co..

277 Perin v. Campbell,

106 Perkins v. Gibbs,

707 v. Pitman,

346 Perry v. Pettingill,

288 Phelps v. Phelps,

578 v. Thomas,

406 Pierce v. Emery,

278 v. Paine's Estate,

467 Pierson v. Hobbs,

283 Pillsbury v. Locke,

285 Pingree v. Coffin,

52 Piper v. Piper,

689 Pitman v. Albany,

695 Pope v. Stacy,

457 Port v. United States,

12 Porter v. Shehan,

588 Powell v. Powell,

571 Pratt v. Mathew,

162 v. Wheeler,

439 Prescott Bank v. Caverly, 702 Preston v. Hutchinson, 573 Price v. Dearborn,

636

R Rackaron v. Marriott,

355 Radcliffe, in re,

159 Radway v. Graham,

684 Radworth v. Parker,

159 Rays v. Johnson,

703 R. B. Forbes, The

544 Reed v. Whitney,

531 Regina v. Burgon,

225 v. Gardner,

225 Hodgson,

225 Regina v. Leech,

167 v. Roebuck,

2:24 v. Rush,

224 v. Scott,

351 Revis v. Smith,

169 Reynolds v. Bridge,

224 Richardson v. Forepaugh, 532 Robb v. United States,

89 Robbins v. Rice,

699 Roberts v. Brett,

357 Robertson, Margaret, in the matter of,

387 Robie v. Flanders,

· 291 Robinson v. Cole,

570 v. Ensign,

408 v. Morse,

708 v. Wheelwright, 161 Roddam v. Morley,

159 Rogers et ux. v. McLean, 681 Rome v. Addison,

574 Roscoe v. Hale,

583 Roys v. Johnson,

703 Ruhl v. Muller,

449 Dyer,

402 v. Fabyan,

345

695 Rutland & Burlington Manf. Co, v. Simpson,

629

Russel v.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]

Stilphin v. Smith,

625 Stickney v. Clements,

700 Stokes v. Cox,

356 Stone v. Boston & Maine R. R. Co.

533 Stone v. Peasley's estate,

523 Storrs v. Putnam,

529 Sirahan, in re,

221 Street v. Hall,

626 Sugden v. Crossland,

103 Sumner v. Mitchell,

294

707

27

Sanford v. The Catawissa, &c.
R. R. Co.

150 Sanderson v. Taft,

440 Savery d. King,

220 Sawyer v. Sawyer,

467 - v. Woodbury,

533 Sayer v. Bradley,

512 Scammon v. Scammon, 282 Sharon o. Simonds, Shepherd r. Briggs,

458 v. Naylor,

43 Sherman v. Dodge's Estate, 455 Shumway v. Collins,

44 Sibley o. Aldrich,

292 Sieveking v. Smith,

163 Small v. Haskins,

628 v. Sumner,

50 Smalley v. Sorrogan,

569 Smith v. Gibbs,

409 v. Boston, Concord and Montreal R. R. Co.

289 v. Lakeman,

516 v. Reynolds,

227 v. Smeltzer,

685 0. Spencer,

515 Snow . Carruth,

198 o. Parsons,

462 South v. Searle,

168 Sparhawk v. Wills,

48 Speedwell, The

490 Spence v. United States, 21 Spencer v. Jones,

441 Siate v. Abbey,

566 D. A, B.,

569 D. Blaisdell,

290 v. Card,

638 0. Clark,

288 d. Ferguson,

395 v. Fuller,

290 v. Gove,

638 v. Johnson,

398 o. Langley,

638 v. McDuffie,

639 0. McGlyon,

632 v. Marvin,

639 r. Nutt,

470 Parks,

530 v. Prescott,

280 Rand,

574 v. Rundlett,

280 v. Wade,

637 Stearos v. Veasey,

282 Steelman v. Taylor,

36 Stevens v. Fisher,

630 Stewart v. Smith,

683

T. Taber v. Jenny, Talbot v. Whipple,

698 Tarble v. Downer,

705 Tayleur v. Blythe,

164 Taylor v. Cheever,

47 v. Nichols,

572 Tebbetts v. Hapgood, 577 Thomas Martin, The

379 -- v. Butt,

226 v. Poole,

700 Thompson's will, in the matter of,

444 Thompson v. Finch,

514 v. Hopper,

99 Thrall v. Lincoln,

461 Thurston v. United States, 88 Towns v. Pratts,

398 Townsend v. Burnham, 288

-. v. Englesby, 458 Travis v. Tyler,

700 Treadwell v. Salisbury Mans. Co.

585 Troy v. Haskell,

292 & Canada Telegraph Co. v. Cornell,

571 Turner v. Comer,

414 Tuttle v. Robinson,

286 Twitchell v. Smith,

640

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

V. Veazie v. Willis,

47 Verger's Case,

617 Vermont Central R. R. Co. v. Burlington,

526 Verry v. McClellan,

414 Vinal v. Dorchester,

585 Vorley v. Richardson,

110 Vose v. Morton,

43

[ocr errors]

Walker v. Armstrong, 109 v. Kennison,

343 v. Norton,

631 v. Swazzee,

386 v. Worcester,

441 Wallace v. Bowen,

465 Walton's trust, in re,

110 Ward v. Stewart,

518 v. United States, 621 Warner v. Bacon,

406 Waterfall v. Penistone, 357 Watris v. Pierce,

388 Watson v. Jacobs,

627 Webb v. Burlington,

526 Webber v. Merrill,

338 Webster v. Webster,

388 Weeks v. Lowerre,

448 Wetmore v. Story,

382 White r. Burrow,

212 Landafi,

690 United States, 139 White Mountains R. R. Co. v. Eastman,

342

White Mountain Road Co., petition of,

693 White River Bank v. Downer, 705 Wickenden v. Webster,

166 Wiggett v. Fox,

104 Wilkinning v. Schmale, 580 Willard v. Williams,

700 Williamson v. Fire Association,

151 Wilson v. Connecticut,

209 Lane,

291 Wilton v. Colvin,

516 Winchester v. Hees,

6 il Windsor v. Turner,

705 Windus v. Windus,

513 Winkley v. Foye,

286 Wisheart v. Legro,

285 Woburn v. Middlesex,

702 Wood v. Adams,

641 v. Bletcher,

166 Denny,

533 Woods v. Davis,

576 Woodbury v. Obear,

588 Woodstock v. Gallup,

215 Wright v. Vanderplank, 167 Wright's Trustees, in re, 354

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

An experienced legal practitioner of our acquaintance was wont to assert that business comes to the profession in veins, as it were, large amounts of similar business at once.

One year is fruitful in insurance causes, he would say; the next perhaps in disputed land titles, and a third in controversies involving constitutional law.

If such a classification be possible, we suppose the present year will be known as the year of contested elections. There have been disputes of this sort from Maine to California. From inspectors of elections to judges, nay, to members of congress, governors, and even entire legislative bodies, no one seems to hold his loaf or his fish this year by an unquestioned title.

These causes, political or quasi political in their nature, are not always decided in the courts of law, and when they are, it is no matter of congratulation to the profession. We consider them the greatest strain upon the sheet anchor of the judiciary.

The parties in such causes appear as champions, with their merits heralded in advance by the newspapers, with their compurgators about them, and fortunate it is for judges and juries who are called upon to decide between such rivals, if they escape becoming to some extent involved in the heat and smoke of the battle, in the opinion of partisans, at least, if not in fact.

In Maine, the question who should have the right to serve VOL. IX. — NO. 1. — NEW SERIES.

1

« PreviousContinue »