Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 14Published for John Conrad and Company, 1854 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... refusal of a motion to quash an execution ; such refusal not being a final judgment , under the twenty - second section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 . The opinion of the Court on the case of Boyle vs. Zacharie and Turner , 6 Peters ...
... refusal of a motion to quash an execution ; such refusal not being a final judgment , under the twenty - second section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 . The opinion of the Court on the case of Boyle vs. Zacharie and Turner , 6 Peters ...
Page 2
... 12th day of September , 1837 , on which the motion to quash the execution and delivery - bond was founded . The motion was refused ; but for what particular reason , does not [ Evans vs. Gee . ] appear ; nor does 2 SUPREME COURT .
... 12th day of September , 1837 , on which the motion to quash the execution and delivery - bond was founded . The motion was refused ; but for what particular reason , does not [ Evans vs. Gee . ] appear ; nor does 2 SUPREME COURT .
Page 3
... refusal of a motion to quash an execution : such record of refusal not being a final judgment in the sense of the twenty - second section of the Judiciary Act . We will content ourselves by referring to the opinion of the Court in the ...
... refusal of a motion to quash an execution : such record of refusal not being a final judgment in the sense of the twenty - second section of the Judiciary Act . We will content ourselves by referring to the opinion of the Court in the ...
Page 10
... refused to make the ridge the boundary , and would agree to no other than a straight line ; and that neither party seems to have considered the place of crossing at the mouth of the Holston , we think , in the language of the Presi ...
... refused to make the ridge the boundary , and would agree to no other than a straight line ; and that neither party seems to have considered the place of crossing at the mouth of the Holston , we think , in the language of the Presi ...
Page 15
... refusing to give the instruction . And we think there was no error in refusing to give the third , fourth , and fifth instructions prayed by the plaintiffs ' counsel . Nor do we perceive any error of which the plaintiffs can complain ...
... refusing to give the instruction . And we think there was no error in refusing to give the third , fourth , and fifth instructions prayed by the plaintiffs ' counsel . Nor do we perceive any error of which the plaintiffs can complain ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of Congress action admitted agreement alleged appellate applied authority avers bank bill boundary cause cession Charles river Circuit Court citizens claim commissioners Company Constitution construction contract counsel Court of Equity Decatur decided decision declared decree deed defendant in error District East Florida entitled equity evidence execution executor exercise fact favour Florida foreign Governor grant ground habeas corpus Holmes Holston issue judgment judicial Judiciary Act jurisdiction jury justice Kibbe land legislature Lessee of Pollard's letter letters testamentary M'Gran mandamus Maryland Massachusetts ment objection opinion parties patent pension persons plaintiffs in error plea pleaded Pollard's Heirs possession Potomac Company principles proceedings provisions purchase question record refused Rhode Island rule settled Spain Spanish statute Story's Laws suit Supreme Court territory tion treaty treaty of Holston United validity Vermont vessel Wheat Woodward and Saffrey writ of error
Popular passages
Page 416 - The legislatures of those districts, or new states, shall never interfere with the primary disposal of the soil by the Unite'd States in Congress assem-bled, nor with any regulations Congress may find necessary for securing the title in such soil to the bona fide purchasers. No tax shall be imposed on lands the property of the United States; and in no case shall non-resident proprietors be taxed higher than residents.
Page 581 - States, and the decision is in favor of such their validity, or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege or exemption specially set up or claimed by either party, under such clause of the said Constitution, treaty, statute or commission...
Page 584 - ... where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any state, on the ground of their being repugnant to the constitution, treaties, or laws, of the United States...
Page 416 - The navigable waters leading into the Mississippi and St. Lawrence, and the carrying places between the same, shall be common highways, and forever free, as well to the inhabitants of the said territory, as to the citizens of the United States, and those of any other states that may be admitted into the confederacy, without any tax, impost, or duty therefor.
Page 448 - March one thousand eight hundred and thirty-one, the full and exclusive right and liberty of making, constructing, using and vending to others to be used...
Page 595 - A final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity...
Page 390 - The Constitution confers absolutely on the Government of the Union the powers of making war and of making treaties; consequently that Government possesses the power of acquiring territory, either by conquest or by treaty.
Page 579 - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
Page 507 - The province of the court is, solely, to decide on the rights of individuals, not to inquire how the executive, or executive officers, perform duties in which they have a discretion. Questions in their nature political, or which are, by the constitution and laws, submitted to the executive, can never be made in this court.
Page 594 - No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, . . . enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, . . .