Page images
PDF
EPUB

1

"ceived against me is at last grown to this degree of bit"terness. Your prudence is not ignorant how much the "Christian religion suffered formerly by the dissimulation "and hypocrisy of the monks. At present, in these men, "I know not what new sort of monks seems to revive; so "much more pernicious than the former, as, with more "subtle artifices of deceiving, and under pretence of per"fection, like 'stage-players who only act a part, they "conceal a more dangerous poison: Who, while they require every thing to be formed according to their own "strict discipline, will not desist, until they have brought "all things into Jewish bondage *."

[ocr errors]

Thus thought, and thus wrote, this admirable divine! this friend to good men of all parties, but a slave to no party of men!

How benevolently disposed this great and good man was, even toward those who differed the most widely from him in religious principles; appears, among many other instances, from the Latin letter, which he wrote to queen Elizabeth, A. D. 1575, to dissuade her majesty from putting to death two Anabaptists, who had been condemned to the fire. Fuller has preserved the whole of this masterly

and

* The occafion on which this letter was written, and the whole of the letter itself, in its original Latin, are extant in Fuller's Church Hift. b. ix. p. 106. For a fummary of it in English, fee Biographia Britannica, vol. iii. p. 2021.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

On Eafter-day was difclofed a congregation of Dutch Anabaptifts, 'without Aldgate in London; whereof feven-and-twenty were taken and imprifoned; and four, bearing faggots at Paul's-Crois, folemnly recanted ⚫ their dangerous opinions. Next month, one Dutchman, and ten women, 'were condemned, of whom one woman was converted to renounce her errors, eight were banished the land, two fo obílinate that command was iffued out for their burning in Smithfield.' FULLER'S Church Hift. b. ix. p. 204.

This fhocking and unjustifiable perfecution, could not but reflect deep difgrace on the Proteftant name. The two unhappy victims were burned, ́ according to their fentence, July 22, 1575. They were both Dutchmen, and, as we are informed by Stowe, died in great horror, with roaring and ⚫ crying.' Chronicle, p. 680. Strype fays their names were John Wiclmacker and Hendrick Ter Woort, and that they fuffered after an imprisonment of fixteen weeks. Much intereft was made in their behalf by the Dutch congregation fettled in London, but the privy council would not fpare them. (Strype's Annals, vol. ii. p. 380.) It was eminently humane, in their countrymen here, to importune the government fo earnestly in their favour; efpecially when we recollect that the interceffors were Calvinifts, and that the fufferers added, to their other herefies, the maintenance of free-will, perfection, juftification by works, and falling from grace; which, however, was infinitely far from warranting the fanguinary igour with which they were treated.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

6

and truly Christian address. The substance of it was as follows: That "To punish, with the flames, the bodies. "of those who err rather from blindness, than obstinacy "of will, is cruel, and more suitable to the example of "the Romish church, than to the mildness of the gospel. "I do not (added he) write thus, from any byass to the "indulgence of error; but from a regard to the lives of men, as being myself a man: And in hope that the offending parties may have an opportunity to repent of, ❝and retract their mistakes." He earnestly beseeches her majesty to spare the lives of these miserable men; or, at least, to soften their mode of punishment: As to banish them, or commit them to perpetual imprisonment, &c. but at all events not to rekindle the Smithfield fires, < which, through her goodness and care, had been so long extinguished. If this could not be granted, at least to allow them a month or two, in order that endeavours might be used to reclaim them from their errors, and thereby to prevent the destruction of their souls, as well as of their bodies.'-Mr Fox (says Fuller) was very loth that Smithfield, formerly consecrated with martyrs' ashes, - should now be profaned with those of heretics; and was desirous that the Papists might enjoy their own monopoly of cruelty, in burning condemned persons. But though Q. Elizabeth constantly called him, her father Fox ;' yet herein was she no dutiful daughter; for she gave him a flat denial, as to the saving of their lives; if, after a month's reprieve and conference with divines, they would not recant their heresies. It is not a little surprizing, that so good and so candid a man as Dr Fuller should endeavour to palliate, if not to justify, the extreme malignity which brought those two Dutchman to the stake. Damnable, (says this historian) were their impieties; and the queen was necessitated to this severity: Who, having formerly punished some traitors, if now sparing these blasphemers, the world would condemn her; as being more carnest in asserting his own safety, than GOD's honour.' A wretched excuse this, for wilful and deliberate murder! It reminds us of Melancthon's fault (falsely fathered on Calvin) in pressing the magistrates of Geneva to burn the heretic Servetus. The answer of a popish princess, on a similar occasion, did more honour to humanity. This lady (who is still living) was solicited, by some Romish ecclesiastics, to concur with them in bringing a supposed heretic to the flames. Is it not true (said she) that heretics burn for ever in hell-fire? Without doubt,' answered

[ocr errors]

the

the priests. It would be too severe then (added she) to burn them in both worlds. Since they are devoted to endless misery hereafter, it is but justice to let them live unmolested here.'

Hitherto, Dr Fuller, and the Biographia Britannica, have been our chief guides in the present account of the truly apostolic Mr Fox. For what we have farther to add, we shall be principally indebted to the indefatigable Mr Clarke *. We have before observed, that while Mr Fox was in exile at Basil, during the prevalence of popery in England; he one day, in a sermon which he preached before his afflicted countrymen in that city, positively assured them, "That the time was now come, for their safe and "happy return home: And that he told them this com"fortable news by express command from GOD.” Several ministers, who were present took occasion afterwards to reprove him with a degree of asperity for publicly declaring, what they took to be, the premature flights of his own fancy and conjecture. But they soon altered their opinion, when authentic intelligence arrived, that Q. Mary the bloody was actually dead.

On his re-settlement here, he set himself to revise and enlarge his admirable MARTYOLOGY. With prodigious pains and constant study, he finished that elaborate work in eleven years. For the sake of greater correctness, he never employed any amanuensis; but wrote every line of this vast book with his own hand, and searched and transcribed all the records and original papers himself. But by such excessive toil, leaving no part of his time free from study, nor affording himself either the repose or relaxations which nature required; his health was so reduced, and his person became so emaciated, and altered, that such of his friends and relations, as only conversed with him occasionally, could not recollect him at sight. Yet, though he grew daily more lean, withered, and exhausted, his hard studies went on as briskly as ever, nor would he be persuaded to lessen his accustomed labours. The Papists, foreseeing how extremely detrimental his history of their errors and cruelties would prove to their cause, exerted their whole art and strength to lessen the reputation of his work. This malice of theirs was of signal service, both to Mr Fox himself, and to the church of GOD at large; as it eventually made his book more intrinsically valuable, by inducing him to weigh, with the most exact

and

* See the first volume of his Marrow of the Ecclefiastical History, p.

232, 383.

and scrupulous attention, the certainty of the facts he recorded, and the validity of the authorities from whence he drew his informations.

Having long served both the church and the world, by his ministry, by his pen, and by the unsullied lustre of a beneficent, useful, and holy life; he comfortably resigned his soul to Christ on the eighteenth of April, 1587. The Lord had given him a foresight of his departure: And so fully persuaded was he, that the time was just at hand when he should quit the body, that (probably, to enjoy unmolested communion with GOD, and to have no worldly interruptions in his last hours) he purposely sent his two sons from home, though he loved them with great tenderness; and before they returned, his spirit, as he had foreseen would be the case, was flown to heaven. He was interred in the chancel of St Giles's, Cripplegate; of which parish he had been in the beginning of Q. Elizabeth's reign, for some time vicar.

Mr Strype says, that a very fair marble stone, fixed in the south wall of that chancel, was presently after erected to his memory, with the following inscription:

[ocr errors]

CHRISTO S. S.

JOHANNI Foxo,

Ecclesia Angelicana Martyrologo fidelissimo,
Antiquitatis historica Indagatori sagacissimo,
Evangelica Veritatis Propugnatori acerrimo,
Thaumaturgo admirabili:

Qui Martyres Marianos, tanquam Phænices, ex cineribus redivives præstitit:

Patri suo, omni pietatis officio imprimis colendo,
Samuel Foxus.
Illius primogenitus,

Hoc Monumentum posuit,

Non sine Lachrymis.

Obiit Die 18 Mens. April. An. Dom. 1587.
Jam septuagenarius.

VITA VITE MORTALIS EST, SPES VITÆ IMMORTALIS.

Fuller acquaints us, that Mr Fox foretold the destruction of, what was madly styled by the pope and Spaniards, the Invincible Armada. The story, (says that historian) is true, though Mr Fox survived not to see the performance of his own prediction.-His dear friend, Dr • Laurence Humfrey, may be said to have died with him; (though his languishing life, lasted a year longer) so

[ocr errors]

⚫ great

[ocr errors]

great was his grief, to be parted from his fellow-colleague, bred together in Oxford, and banished together into Germany.'

Among the graces, for which our Martyrologist was eminent, shone his extensive (some would almost term it, profuse) liberality to the poor. He was so bountiful to them while he lived, that he had no ready money to leave to them at his death. His love to his Saviour was such, that he could never refuse giving to any who asked him for relief, in the name of Jesus, or for Christ's sake. A friend once enquiring of him, whether he recollected a • certain poor man, whom he used to relieve?' He answered, "Yes, I remember him well: And I willingly "forget lords and ladies, to remember such as he."

His ability in comforting afflicted consciences was very peculiar: No wonder, therefore, that his house was frequented by persons of all ranks, from noblemen down to the poorest of the flock; who were labouring under souldistresses.

His time was divided between study, preaching, praying, spiritual conference, and visiting the sick and afflicted. His principal hours for intercourse with GOD in secret prayer were during the night season; at which times of holy retirement, he has been heard to agonize with GOD, and to mingle his supplications with groanings which could not be uttered.

He was distinguished by a deep and settled contempt of earthly things: More especially, of pleasures, amusements, wealth, and honours. Hence, he abstracted himself, as much as he possibly could, from all friendship, society, and connection, with the great and noble of this world. The money, which was sometimes offered him by rich men, he accepted; but the poor were as sure to have it, as ever he received it.

There have been macaronies in all ages. One of Mr Fox's sons had a great desire to travel beyond sea, from which his father could by no means dissuade him. After a tour of several years, he returned home, and presented himself to the good old man, in a fantastical outlandish habit. "Who are you, said Mr Fox."— Sir, I am your • son Samuel.'-To which his reply was: "O my son, "who has taught thee to make thyself so ridiculous ?” This reproof seems to have been attended with good effect : For the giddy youth proved, afterwards, a serious, devout, learned, and respectable man. In 1610, he wrote the life

of

« PreviousContinue »