...CLAIMED IN ORIGINAL PATENT — INADVERTENCE, ACCIDENT OR MISTAKE. — "It is now accepted doctrine that 'the claim of a specific device or combination, and...dedication to the public of that which is not claimed.' 'This legal effect of the patent cannot be revoked unless the patentee surrenders it and proves that...

...BRADLEY in Miller v. Brass Co. 104 US 352, is therefore applicable : "But it must be remembered that the claim of a specific device or combination, and...are, in law, a dedication to the public of that which i? not claimed. It is a declaration that that which is not claimed is either not the patentee's invention...

...be entertained, and, on a proper showing, correction may be made. But it must be remembered that/he claim of a specific device or combination, and an...apparent on the face of the patent, are, in law, a dedicaiion to the public of that which is not claimed. It is a declaration that that which is not claimed...

...unreasonable delay. Further, that the claim of a specific device, and the omission to claim other devices apparent on the face of the patent, are in law a dedication to the public of that which was not claimed, and the legal effect of the patent cannot be revoked unless the patentee surrenders...

...combination and an omission to claim other (levicesor combinations, apparent on tlir 'ace of the patent, me in law a dedication to the public of that which is not claim- 1! It is a declaration that that which is not claimed in cither not the putfntee'g invention,...

...Bradley in Miller v. Brass Co. (104 U. 8., 352) is therefore applicable: Hut it must lie remembered that the claim of a specific device or combination, and...claim other devices or combinations apparent on the fuce of the patent, are in law a dedication to the public nf thnt which is not claimed. It is a declaration...

...different persons and at different times " This is more like the case of Miller v. Brass Co., supra, where it is said at p. 362, " The claim of a specific...reissue of the patent in question. The same appears by Bantz v. Fruntz, 105 USR 160, where the original patent was only meant to cover a combination of several...

...vs. Brass Co., as reported in 104 US, 350, in which the court say: "But it must be remembered that the claim of a specific device or combination, and...dedication to the public of that which is not claimed." And in the same opinion, on page 352, they use this language: "This legal effect of the patent cannot...

...combination in a patent and the omission to claim other devices or combinations apparent on its face are in law a dedication to the public of that which is not claimed. 2. When such omission arose from inadvertence, accident, or mistake, the appropriate remedy is by reissue,...

...may be entertained, and on a proper showing, correction may be made. But it must be remembered that the claim of a specific device or combination and...dedication to the public of that which is not claimed. . . . The legal effect of the patent cannot be revoked unless the patentee surrenders it and proves...