The Pacific Reporter, Volume 200West Publishing Company, 1921 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 421
... injuries caused from anticipated risks of the service if the law is to be of the benefit intended." The injury to Shrout was not intentional, nor was it contemplated, which tends to place it In the category of an accident arising out of ...
... injuries caused from anticipated risks of the service if the law is to be of the benefit intended." The injury to Shrout was not intentional, nor was it contemplated, which tends to place it In the category of an accident arising out of ...
Page 795
... Injury In any event, no liability for the original act or omission exists; but excepting such case, the test is not ... injury probably would not have happened. The principle is illustrated in Strojny v. Wheel Co., 116 111. App. 550 ...
... Injury In any event, no liability for the original act or omission exists; but excepting such case, the test is not ... injury probably would not have happened. The principle is illustrated in Strojny v. Wheel Co., 116 111. App. 550 ...
Page 1022
... injury, though an intentional act, something unusual, unforeseen, and unexpected occurs, which produces the injury, it is accidental; but, if in the act which precedes the injury something usual, foreseen, and expected occurs, which ...
... injury, though an intentional act, something unusual, unforeseen, and unexpected occurs, which produces the injury, it is accidental; but, if in the act which precedes the injury something usual, foreseen, and expected occurs, which ...
Contents
Jones Industrial Accident Commission | xxxii |
Carey leople v Cal App 835 | lviii |
First Nat Bank v Cox Okl | lix |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirmed agreement alleged amended Appeal from Superior appellant Bank Beckham county California cause of action claim Code Commission Company complaint concur contention contract corporation Cotton county coun damages deed defendant in error defendant's demurrer dence denied Digests and Indexes District Court employees entitled evidence execution fact fendant filed finding franchise George Seifert granted held highway Idaho injury instructions Janss Investment Company Judge judgment jury Key-Numbered Digests land lease liability Lucile Brown ment motion negligence Oklahoma parties payment person petition petitioner plaintiff in error proceedings purchaser purpose question reason record respondent rule school district Seifert Sharum statute statute of frauds strikers sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony thereof tiff tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court verdict Wash witness writ