 | United States. Adjutant-General's Office - 1864 - 282 pages
...pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral beings, responsible to one another, and to God. 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty — that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake... | |
 | United States. War Department, Francis Lieber - Military law - 1863 - 48 pages
...pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral beings, responsible to one another, and to God. 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty, that Is,\ the infliction of suffering for the sake... | |
 | United States. War Department - 1863 - 312 pages
...pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral beings, responsible to one another, and to God. 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty, that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake... | |
 | United States dept. of war - 1864 - 804 pages
...pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or sapposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral beings, responsible to one another, and to God. 10. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty, that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake... | |
 | United States. War Department - 1864 - 304 pages
...pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modem law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral beings, responsible to one another, and to God. 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty — that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake... | |
 | 1865 - 504 pages
...pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral beings, responsible to one another and to God. 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty, that is, the infliction of .suffering for the sake... | |
 | Frank Moore - United States - 1865 - 830 pages
...pledged regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral beings, responsible to one another and to God." The striking contrast to these teachings and practices, presented by our army when invading Pennsylvania,... | |
 | 1865 - 444 pages
...war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in publia war, do not cease, on this account, to be moral beings, responsible to one another and to God. 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty, that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake... | |
 | Augustus Choate Hamlin - Nazi concentration camps - 1866 - 294 pages
...pledged regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...moral . beings, responsible to one another and to God. 1 6. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty, — that is, the infliction of suffering for the... | |
 | Johann Caspar Bluntschli - International law - 1868 - 548 pages
...pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public...another, and to God. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty, that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering or for revenge, nor of maiming... | |
| |
Men who take up arms against one another in public war do not cease on this account to be moral beings, responsible to one another, and to God. 
