Reports of Civil and Criminal Cases Decided by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1785-1951, Volume 14; Volume 77 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 77
Page 24
... received and paid for by the city council . 2. The council is the agent of the law in making contracts for street ... receiving a part of the work and dispensing with the performance of other parts , the city council can not compel the ...
... received and paid for by the city council . 2. The council is the agent of the law in making contracts for street ... receiving a part of the work and dispensing with the performance of other parts , the city council can not compel the ...
Page 26
... received long after the time stipulated for its completion . The cost was then apportioned among the owners of lots fronting and binding on the street , and a precept was issued against the appellee for the part of the cost apportioned ...
... received long after the time stipulated for its completion . The cost was then apportioned among the owners of lots fronting and binding on the street , and a precept was issued against the appellee for the part of the cost apportioned ...
Page 27
... the common coun- cil received the work in that condition , although by formal action it construed the contract as binding him to gravel the City of Henderson v . Lambert . whole street ; VOL . XIV . ] 27 JANUARY TERM , 1878 .
... the common coun- cil received the work in that condition , although by formal action it construed the contract as binding him to gravel the City of Henderson v . Lambert . whole street ; VOL . XIV . ] 27 JANUARY TERM , 1878 .
Page 29
... receiving the work when only partly completed be valid as against the lot- owners , that action had the effect to create upon them by indi- rection a new liability which , as we have already seen , could not have been done by direct ...
... receiving the work when only partly completed be valid as against the lot- owners , that action had the effect to create upon them by indi- rection a new liability which , as we have already seen , could not have been done by direct ...
Page 38
... received nothing . The appellant stated in her pleadings that they loaned the $ 1,000 only because of the indorsement by appellees of the note of G. Eichhorn for said sum . If this be true , the consideration was $ 1,000 . But we are ...
... received nothing . The appellant stated in her pleadings that they loaned the $ 1,000 only because of the indorsement by appellees of the note of G. Eichhorn for said sum . If this be true , the consideration was $ 1,000 . But we are ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
12 Bush action Adm'r agreement alleged appellant appellant's appellee assignment authority Bank bond Buford Bullitt County cause remanded certificate chancellor Chancery Court chap chapter Church of Louisville CIRCUIT COURT Civil Code claim clerk common carrier common law Commonwealth constitution contract counsel county court court of equity creditors Dana debt declarations deed defendant DELIVERED THE OPINION demurrer duty election Elliott County entitled equity evidence ex'r executed fact feme covert Ferguson filed Garrard County guardian held homestead husband indictment indorsed intended J. J. Mar judgment jurisdiction jury Krauth land legislature liable lien mandamus ment mortgage non est factum offense paid parties payment person petition plaintiff possession Presbyterian Church proceedings prosecution purchase question reason record rendered reversed rule sheriff sold Stat suit surety testator tion trial Trustees vendee void wife witness