Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

COMMISSIONERS

OF THE

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE

DURING THE TIME OF THESE DECISIONS.

Hon. ELLIS SPEAR

To OCTOBER 31, 1878.

Hon. HALBERT E. PAINE

FROM NOVEMBER 1, 1878.

ASSISTANT AND ACTING COMMISSIONER,

Hon W. H. DOOLITTLE.

TABLE OF CASES.

DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSIONERS.

Page. 142 69

......

7 96 133

84 65, 114

94

8 47 21 28

Alden, ex parte. (Trade-mark)
Anders, ex parte. (Appeal)
Bailey, Stephens v.....
Barker, Leighton v
Bell et al., Gray v..
Bering v. Haworth. (Interference)
Bigelow, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Bird et al. v. Walsh. (Interference)
Blackman v. Morray et al.. (Interference).
Blair, Kirchner v.
Block & Co, ex parte. (Refundment of money paid by mistake)...
Burge, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Caire, ex parte. (Trade-mark)............
Campbell, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Cardwell, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Carter, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Chesterman, Daniels v ....
Compton et al., Perkins et al. v....
Connor v. Williams. (Interference. Clocks).
Consolidated Fruit Jar Co., The, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Dailey, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Daniels v. Chesterman. (Interference)
Davis v. Scharffe. (Interference)...
Dermody v. Pennock. (Interference)..
Designolle, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal) ..
Doty, Funck v.

........

131 88 124 104 26 32 137 101

3 26 63 93

10 18-77

......

106

Ford et al., Scott v......
Funck, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Funck v. Doty. (Interference)
Gokey, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Wagon-axlo cutter)
Gray v. Bell et al. (Interference. Telephones)..
Hall & Co. et al., ex parte. (Trade-mark).......
Hamilton, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Harrison, ex parte. (Reference).....
Haworth. Bering 0..

89 18-77

....

...............

.....

144 133

....

42 16 58 84

....

Hoe et al. v. Scott. (Interference)....
Hoosier Drill Co. v. Ingels. (Interference)
Huttner et al. v. Knox et al. (Interlocutory appeal).
Huttner et al. v. Knox et al. (Motion for rehearing)...

Page.

108 115

81 126

115 145 134

112

Ingels, Hoosier Drill Co. v. (Interference)
Ingersoll, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Paper dishes)
Ives, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)...
Jenks, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Kirchner v. Blair. (Interference)
Knowles, Wyman v..
Knowlton, ex parte. (Appeal).
Knox et al., Huttner et al, v

47 35

130 .81-126

57 96

46 147

[ocr errors]

Langlois, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Leighton v. Barker. (Interference)..
Lisner, ex parte. (Trade-mark)
Locke, Withington v......
Marsching & Co., ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Trade-mark)
Mason, ex parte. (Appeal from Examiner-in-chief)
Mayor, ex parte. (Petition to revive application)...
Morray et al., Blackman v..

143 31 60 8

Paine, ex parte. (Motion to suspend issue)
Parker, ex parte. (Trade-mark).
Pease, Towers v
Pennock, Dermody v
Perkins et al. v. Compton et al. (Interference)....
Powell, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Powell, Yost and Warner v
Prescott, Stearns v

51 14

6 93 32 72 23 24

......

111

67 111 62

Quimby v. Randall et al. (Interference).
Rader & Co., ex parte. (Trade-mark).
Randall et al., Quimby v.
Rogers and Huggins, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Sanders, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Scharffe, Davis v
Schoonmaker, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Scott v. Ford et al. (Interference)....
Scott, Hoe et al. v
Sheldon, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).....
Shoeninger, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Design)
Simpson v. Wright et al. (Interference. Trade-mark)...
Smith v. Wincholl et al. (Interference)
Stearns v. Prescott. (Interference)..
Stephens v. Bailey. (Interference)..
Thomas, ex parte. (Trade-inark)..
Towers.v. Pease. (Interference)
Walsh, Bird et al. v
Warburg & Co., ex parte. (Trade-mark)

66 63 40 106 108

44

128 119-126

75 24 7

113 6

94 5

« PreviousContinue »