The Pacific Reporter, Volume 197West Publishing Company, 1921 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 469
... decree is final in the sense that it cannot be disturbed by the chancellor after the term at which it was rendered, but not final for the purposes of appeal. But see Barton v. Turley, 11 Lea, 600, explaining Meek v. Mathis, 1 Heisk. 534 ...
... decree is final in the sense that it cannot be disturbed by the chancellor after the term at which it was rendered, but not final for the purposes of appeal. But see Barton v. Turley, 11 Lea, 600, explaining Meek v. Mathis, 1 Heisk. 534 ...
Page 471
... decree was final, and not interlocutory, as it finally disposed of the subject of litigation so far as the court was concerned. Chief Justice Savage defines a final decree to be the last decree which is necessary to be entered to give ...
... decree was final, and not interlocutory, as it finally disposed of the subject of litigation so far as the court was concerned. Chief Justice Savage defines a final decree to be the last decree which is necessary to be entered to give ...
Page 476
... decree appealed from is not a final decree, which motion has been reserved to the hearing. It is clear that the decree from which this appeal is prosecuted finally determines that each of the children of Frederieka L. Stahl is the ...
... decree appealed from is not a final decree, which motion has been reserved to the hearing. It is clear that the decree from which this appeal is prosecuted finally determines that each of the children of Frederieka L. Stahl is the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adverse possession affirmed alleged amount Angeles answer Appeal from Superior appellant April 12 attorney Bank cause of action claim Code Colo complaint concur contract corporation damages decree deed defendant defendant's demurrer denied Digests and Indexes dismissed District Court election entitled estoppel evidence execution fact fendant filed fraud held Horseshoe reservoir Idaho injury issue Jesse Knight Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Key-Numbered Digests land lease lien lumber ment mortgage motion negligence nonsuit owner paid parties payment person petition plaintiff in error pleadings possession proceedings purchase question quiet title real property reason recover respondent rule sheriff statute street suit Superior Court Supreme Court sustained testified testimony thereof tiff tion topic and KEY-NUMBER tract trial court Tribune Company verdict Wash witness writ