LAW TIMES REPORTS. A COLLECTION OF LEADING CASES DECIDED IN THE COURTS OF THE RESORT OF THE STATES. EDITED BY ROWLAND COX. " It is imposible but in process of time, as well from the nature of things chang. NEW SERIES. – VOLUME I. NEW YORK: 1874. TABLE OF CASES. PAGE PAGE Co. v.) . . . . . . . . Adams Ex. Co. (Bank of Ky. v.) : 451 Florence S. M. Co. (G. & B. S. M. 389 Amn. Steamship Co. (Brady v.). 402 Ford v. Fitchburg R. R. Co. . 501 Bank of Ky. 0. Adams Ex. Co. 451 Fort (U. P. R. R. Co. v.) 121 Bank of St. Paul (Wilson v.) 1 Fourth Nat'l Bank of Chicago v. Barnett v. Oppenheimer 118 City Nat'l Bank of Gr. Rapids · 386 Bartemeyer v. The State . . 200 Francisco (Manhat. Life Ins. Co.v.) 56 Barton (Walsh v.). 341 Franke, in re 476 Bennett (Cobb v.) 172 | Fryberger (Heaton c.) . 307 Blake Crusher Co. v. Ward 423 Fugate (Nash v.) 69 Borries v. Imperial Ottoman Bank 181 Galbreath (Indianapolis & St. L. Brady v. Am. Steamship Co. 402 R. R. Co. v.). 473 Cage (People v.) 127 Galpin v. Page 534 Cagley (McIntyre v.) : . 104 Gordon o. Manchester & Lawrence Campbell v. Dearborn 107 R. R. Co. 8 Carris v. Carris . 41 Gorman (Commissioners of Boise Cent. Pac. R. R. Co.(Huntington v.) 94 349 Champion, The . 493 Graves v. Lebanon Nat'l Bank 59 City Nat'l Bank of Grand Rapids Gray v. Rollo . 195 (Fourth Nat'l Bank of Chicago Griffiths, in re 476 v.) 386 Grover & Baker S. M. Co. v. FlorCity of Watertown (Rees v.) 300 ence S. M. Co. 389 Cobb v. Bennett 172 Hager v. Hill . 139 Commissioners of Boise Co. v. Gor- Hailes v. Van Wormer . 75 349 Hayner v. Smith Commonwealth (Jones v.) 266 Heaton c. Fryberger 307 v. Lockwood 141 Hecker (Rumford Chem. Works v.) 519 (Murphy v.) 486 Herron (U. S. v.) 274 Conawango Pet. Ref. Co. v. Cun- Hestonville, &c. R.R. Co.(Crissy v.) 166 ningham 57 Hill, in re 421 Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. (Covers- Hill (Hager v.). 139 239 v. Whitcomb 382 Conn. Mut. Life Ins: Co. (Moore v.) 319 Horn v. Lockhart 55 Cooledge r. McCone 214 Howard (Masterson v.) 155 Coverston v. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Huntington v. Cent. Pac. R. R. Co. 94 239 Hyde v. Woods . 354 Crissy v. Hestonville, &c. R. R. Co. 166 Imperial Ottoman Bank(Borries v.) 181 Cunningham (Conawango Pet. Ref. Indianapolis & St. L. R. R. Co. v. 57 Galbreath. 473 Davenport v. Underwood 16 Ins. Co. (De Lancy v.) 80 Davis (Supervisors of Knox Co. v.) 461 Ives (Warren v.) 363 107 Jackson (Ethridge v.) 271 336 Jenkins (Self v.) De Lancey v. Ins. Co. 80 Jermyn v. Moffitt . 367 Dorgan v. Telegraph Co. 406 Jones v. The Commonwealth . 266 Ethridge v. Jackson 271 Keeler, in re . 422 Excelsior Ins. Co. v. Royal Ins. Co. 331 Kirk (Weir v.) 37 Fairbury, &c. R. R. Co. (Lange Lange, in re 257 101 Langebar v. Fairbury, &c. R. R. Co. 101 Finch (Washington University v.). 152 Laverick (Searle v.) 174 Fitchburg R. R. Co. (Ford v.) . 501 | Lea v. Wolff . . 400 (Met. Com. Casting Co. v.) 135 Lebanon Nat'l Bank (Graves v.) · 59 204 Lee v. Rodgers. 218 . . . . . . · 123 Leonard v. Storer 218 Lewis v. London, &c. R. W. Co. 187 Royal Ins. Co. (Excelsior Ins. Co. Lockwood (Commonwealth v.). 141 Rumford Chem. Works v. Hecker . 519 372 198 Long (Philadelphia & Reading R. Scott v. Nat'l Bank of Chester Val- 232 Second National Bank of Chicago McIntyre v. Cagley 368 508 . 471 507 Manchester & Lawrence R. R. Co. Smoot (Perry v.) Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Fran- Stark (Starr v.) Mass. Nat'l Bank (Matthews v.) . 512 Matthews v. Mass. Nat'l Bank . 512 Supervisors of Carroll Co. v. U. S. Mayor, &c. of Nashville v. Ray 248 | Supervisors of Knox Co. v. Davis . 461 gent v.). 376 v. Fitchburg R. R. Co. · 135 Swasey v. Minturn v. Smith 507 Telegraph Co. (Dorgan v.) 406 . 367 | Tiffany v. National Bank of Mis- Moore v. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. 319 souri . 158 Morey v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co. 160 Tome v. Parkersburg Branch R. R. Murphy v. The Commonwealth 486 Co.. 69 Turner's Assignee (Sleek v.) 485 National Bank of Chester Valley Underwood (Davenport v.) 16 National Bank of Mo. (Tiffany v.) 158 (United Society of Shakers N. Y. C. R. R. Co. v. Lockwood 21 v.) N. Y. Life Ins. Co. (Morey v.). . 160 U. P. R. R. Co. v. Fort No. Ca. R. R. Co. (Swasey v.). · 359 | United Society of Shakers v. Un- Nugent v. Supervisors of Putnam Co. 376 derwood Ould v. Richmond . 241 U.S. (Sup. of Carroll Co. v.) 75 Parkersburg Branch R. R. Co. Ward (Blake Crusher Co. v.) 423 234 | Washington University v. Finch . 152 Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Long 169 Weir v. Kirk Ray (Mayor, &c. of Nashville v.) 248 Wilson v. Bank of St. Paul THE AMERICAN LAW TIMES REPORTS : A COLLECTION OF LEADING CASES DECIDED IN THE COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES AND COURTS OF FINAL APPEAL OF ALL THE STATES. NEW Something more than passive non-resistance in an insolvent deblor is necessary to invalidate a judgment and levy on his property when the debt is due and he has no defence. In such case there is no legal obligation on the debtor to file a petition in bankruptcy to prevent the judgment and levy, and a failure to do so is not sufficient evidence of an intent to give a preference to the judgment creditor, or to defeat the operation of the bankrupt law. Though the judgment creditor in such a case may know the insolvent condition of the debtor, his judgment and levy upon his property are not, therefore, void, and are no violation of the act. A lien thus obtained by him will not be displaced by subsequent proceedings in bankruptcy, though commenced within four months after levy of the execution or rendition of the judgment. MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court. This case comes before us on a certificate of division in opinion between the circuit and district judges for the District of Minnesota. The statement of facts and the questions certified are as follows: The complainant is the assignee in bankruptcy of the firm of Vanderhoof Bros., lately merchants in the city of St. Paul. The defendant is the City Bank of St. Paul. The bill is filed to determine which of the parties is entitled to the stock of goods of the bankrupts, or the proceeds thereof. The assignee claims the goods, or the proceeds thereof, as VOL. I. 1 |