Page images
PDF
EPUB

you any thing that I can find. Is Burke's speech on American taxation published by himself? Is it authentick? I remember to have heard you say, that you had never considered East Indian affairs; though, surely, they are of much importance to Great Britain. Under the recollection of this, I shelter myself from the reproach of ignorance about the Americans. If you write upon the subject, I shall certainly understand it. But, since you seem to expect that I should know something of it, without your instruction, and that my own mind should suggest something, I trust you will put me in the way.

"What does Becket mean by the Originals of Fingal and other poems of Ossian, which he advertises to have lain in his shop?"

TO JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ.

"28th Jan. 1775.

"DEAR SIR,-You sent me a case to consider, in which I have no facts but what are against us, nor any principles on which to reason. It is vain to try to write thus without materials. The fact seems to be against you; at least I cannot know nor say any thing to the contrary. I am glad that you like the book so well. I hear no more of Macpherson. I shall long to know what Lord Hailes says of it. Lend it him privately. I shall send the parcel as soon as I can. Make my compliments to Mrs. Boswell. I am, sir, &c. "SAM. JOHNSON."

"" MR. BOSWELL TO DR. JOHNSON. "Edinburgh, 2d Feb. 1775.

"As to Macpherson, I am anxious to have from yourself a full and pointed account of what has passed between you and him. It is confidently told here, that before your book came out he sent to you, to let you know that he understood you meant to deny the authenticity of Ossian's poems; that the originals were in his possession; that you might have inspection of them, and might take the evidence of people skilled in the Erse language; and that he hoped, after this fair offer, you would not be so uncandid as to assert that he had refused reasonable proof. That you paid no regard to his message, but published your strong attack upon him; and then he wrote a letter to you, in such terms as he thought suited to one who had not acted as a man of veracity. You may believe it gives me pain to hear your conduct represented as unfavourable, while I can only deny what is said, on the ground that your character refutes it, without having any information to oppose. Let me, I beg it of

you, be furnished with a sufficient answer to any calumny upon this occasion.

"Lord Hailes writes to me (for we correspond more than we talk together), ' As to Fingal, I see a controversy arising, and purpose to keep out of its way. There is no doubt that I might mention some circumstances; but I do not choose to commit them to paper. What his opinion is I do not know. He says, 'I am singularly obliged to Dr. Johnson for his accurate and useful criticisms. Had he given some strictures on the general plan of the work, it would have added much to his favours.' He is charmed with your verses on Inchkenneth, says they are very elegant, but bids me tell you, he doubts whether

be

"Legitimas faciunt pectora pura preces,' according to the rubrick2: but that 1 His lordship, notwithstanding his resolution, did commit his sentiments to paper, and in one of his notes affixed to his Collection of Old Scot

tish Poetry, he says, "to doubt the authenticity of those poems is a refinement in scepticism indeed."-J. BOSWELL.

2 [Meaning, perhaps, that this line would, if taken as a general principle, exclude the expe diency of any form of prayer, or the necessity of a priesthood, and consequently impugn our liturgy and church establishment; but Dr. Johnson's verses referred to a case not of public but of dothough its liturgy affords admirable helps to primestic prayer; and the Church of England, vate devotion, does not affect to regulate it by any form or rubrick; it was, however, perhaps, this criticism which induced Johnson to substitute for this elegant line the obscure and awkward

one,

"Sint pro legitimis pura labella sacris.” See ante, p. 437, n.-ED.] In the Appendix to the English copy, we have, in addition to this note, what follows.

[While this volume (vol. iii. of the English edition) was passing through the press, but after pp. 21 and 171 (ante, p. 437, and p. 498, of this ed the Editor with several interesting papers edition) had been printed, Mr. Langton favour(which had belonged to his grandfather, Mr. the Verses on Inch-Kenneth, in Dr. Johnson's Bennet Langton), and, amongst them, a copy of it appears that the line which the Editor ventured own hand-writing, dated 2d Dec. 1773, by which to consider as inferior to the rest,

"Sint pro legitimis pura labella sacris,” variations which Dr. Johnson had, it seems, sucwas manufactured by Mr. Langton from two cessively rejected;

and

Sint pro legitimis pectora pura sacris,

Legitimas faciunt pura labella preces; so that we may safely restore the reading which Johnson appears finally to have approved,

"Legitimas faciunt pectora pura preces.” 437, except only that" duas cepit casa” is “duas Mr. Langton's copy agrees with that ante, p. tenuit casa”—and "procul esse jubet” is “ pro

Is your concern; for, you know, he is a word, when better evidence, if he had it, Presbyterian."

[blocks in formation]

TO JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ.
"7th Feb. 1775.

"MY DEAR BOSWELL, I am surprised that, knowing as you do the disposition of your countrymen to tell lies in favour of each other 2, you can be at all affected by any reports that circulate among them. Macpherson never in his life offered me a sight of any original or of any evidence of any kind; but thought only of intimidating me by noise and threats, till my last answer -that I would not be deterred from detecting what I thought a cheat by the menaces of a ruffian-put an end to our correspondence.

"The state of the question is this. He, and Dr. Blair, whom I consider as deceived, say, that he copied the poem from old manuscripts. His copies, if he had them, and I believe him to have none, are nothing.. Where are the manuscripts? They can be shown if they exist, but they were never shown. De non existentibus et non apparentibus, says our law, eadem est ratio. No man has a claim to credit upon his own

cul esse velit." How it happened that the copy sent by Johnson to Boswell in 1775 should be so mutilated and curtailed from a copy written so early as Dec. 1773, is not to be explained.-ED.] The learned and worthy Dr. Lawrence, whom Dr. Johnson respected and loved as his physician and friend.-BOSWELL.

My friend has, in this letter, relied upon my testimony, with a confidence, of which the ground has escaped my recollection.-BoswELL. [This, and a subsequent phrase in this letter, must have left poor Mr. Boswell sorely perplexed between his desire to stand well with his countrymen, and his inability to deny Johnson's assertion. evasion is awkward enough, for there are several passages in his Journal of the Tour which seem, if not to justify, at least to excuse Johnson's appeal to him; for instance, Mr. Boswell's observation, ante, 20th October, on "the confident

His

carelessness of the statements with which he and Dr. Johnson were so constantly deceived and provoked."-ED.]

may be easily produced. But so far as we can find, the Erse language was never written till very lately for the purposes of religion. A nation that cannot write, or a language that was never written, has no manuscripts.

"But whatever he has he never offered to show. If old manuscripts should now be mentioned, I should, unless there were more evidence than can be easily had, suppose them another proof of Scotch conspiracy in national falsehood.

"Do not censure the expression; you know it to be true.

"Dr. Memis's question is so narrow as to allow no speculation; and I have no facts before me but those which his advocate has produced against you.

"I consulted this morning the president of the London College of Physicians, who says, that with us, doctor of physick (we do not say doctor of medicine) is the highest title that a practiser of physick can have; that doctor implies not only physician, but teacher of physick; that every doctor is legally a physician; but no man, not a doctor, can practise physic but by license particularly granted. The doctorate is a license of itself. It seems to us a very slender cause of prosecution.

[ocr errors]

*

[blocks in formation]

What words were used by Mr. Macpherson in his letter to the venerable sage, I have never heard; but they are generally said to have been of a nature very different from the language of literary contest. Dr. Johnson's answer appeared in the newspapers of the day, and has since been frequently republished; but not with perfect accuracy. I give it as dictated to me by. himself, written down in his presence, and authenticated by a note in his own handwriting, "This, I think, is a true copy 3."

"MR. JAMES MACPHERSON,-I received your foolish and impudent letter. Any violence offered me I shall do my best to repel; and what I cannot do for myself, the be deterred from detecting what I think a I hope I never shall cheat, by the menaces of a ruffian.

law shall do for me.

"What would you have me retract? I thought your book an imposture, I think it an imposture still. For this opinion I have given my reasons to the publick, which I

3 I have deposited it in the British Museum.BOSWELL.

here dare you to refute. Your rage I defy. Your abilities, since your Homer, are not so formidable; and what I hear of your morals inclines me to pay regard not to what you shall say, but to what you shall prove. You may print this if you will.

"SAM. JOHNSON."

Mr. Macpherson little knew the character of Dr. Johnson, if he supposed that he could be easily intimidated; for no man was ever more remarkable for personal courage. He had, indeed, an awful dread of death, or rather, "of something after death: " and what rational man, who seriously thinks of quitting all that he has ever known, and going into a new and unknown state of being, can be without that dread? But his fear was from reflection; his courage natural. His fear, in that one instance, was the result of philosophical and religious consideration. He feared death, but he feared nothing else, not even what might occasion death.

[ocr errors]

rectly swam into it. He told me himself that one night he was attacked in the street by four men, to whom he would not yield, but kept them all at bay, till the watch came up, and carried both him and them to the round-house. In the playhouse at Lichfield, as Mr. Garrick informed me, Johnson having for a moment quitted a chair which was placed for, him between the side-scenes, a gentleman took possession of it, and, when Johnson on his return civilly demanded his seat, rudely refused to give it up; upon which Johnson laid hold of it, and tossed him and the chair into the pit 2. Foote, who so successfully revived the old comedy, by exhibiting living characters, had resolved to imitate Johnson on the stage, expecting great profits from his ridicule of so celebrated a man. Johnson being informed of his intention, and being at dinner at Mr. Thomas Davies's, the bookseller, from whom I had the story, he asked Mr. Davies, "what was the common price of an oak stick?" and being answer[Fear was indeed a sensation to ed sixpence, "Why then, sir," said he, Piozzi, which Dr. Johnson was an utter "give me leave to send your servant to stranger, excepting when some sud- purchase me a shilling one. I have a den apprehensions seized him that he was double quantity; for I am told Foote means going to die; and even then, he kept all his to take me off, as he calls it, and I am dewits about him, to express the most hum-termined the fellow shall not do it with imble and pathetic petitions to the Almighty: and when the first paralytic stroke took his speech from him, he instantly set about composing a prayer in Latin, at once to deprecate God's mercy, to satisfy himself that his mental powers remained unimpaired, and to keep them in exercise, that they might not perish by permitted stagnation.

p. 214.

When one day he had at Streatham taken tincture of antimony instead of emetic wine, for a vomit, he was himself the person to direct what should be done for him, and managed with as much coolness and deliberation as if he had been prescribing for an indifferent person.]

punity." Davies took care to acquaint Foote of this, which effectually checked the wantonness of the mimick. Mr. Macpherson's menaces made Johnson provide himself with the same implement of defence; and had he been attacked, I have no doubt that, old as he was, he would have made his corporal prowess be felt as much as his intellectual.

His "Journey to the Western Islands of Scotland" is a most valuable performance. It abounds in extensive philosophical views of society, and in ingenious sentiment and lively description. A considerable part of it, indeed, consists of speculaMany instances of his resolution may be tions, which, many years before he saw mentioned. One day, at Mr. Beauclerk's the wild regions which we visited togethhouse in the country, when two large dogs er, probably had employed his attention, were fighting, he went up to them, and though the actual sight of those scenes unbeat them till they separated; and at anoth-doubtedly quickened and augmented them. er time, when told of the danger there was that a gun might burst if charged with many balls, he put in six or seven, and fired it off against a wall. Mr. Langton told me, that when they were swimming together, near Oxford, he cautioned Dr. Johnson against a pool, which was reckoned particularly dangerous; upon which Johnson di

1 ["When we inquired," says Mrs. Piozzi, into the truth of this story, he answered, the dogs have been somewhat magnified, I believe. They were, as I remember, two stout young pointers; but the story has gained but little." Piozzi, p. 88. This story was told ante, p. 438.-ED.]

Mr. Orme, the very able historian, agreed with me in this opinion, which he thus strongly expressed: "There are in that book thoughts, which, by long revolution in the great mind of Johnson, have been formed and polished like pebbles rolled in the ocean!"

That he was to some degree of excess tertained an undue prejudice against both a true born Englishman, so as to have enthe country and the people of Scotland, must be allowed. But it was a prejudice of the

2 [If Mrs. Piozzi had reported any statement so obviously exaggerated as this, Mr. Boswell would have been very indignant.-ED.].

ED.

mired. [We have seen his kind acknowledgment of Macleod's hospitality 3, and the loss of poor Col is recorded in his journal in affectionate and pathetic terms.] His candour and amiable disposition is conspicuous from his conduct, when informed by Mr. Macleod, of Rasay, that he had committed a mistake, which gave that gentleman some uneasiness. He wrote him [as we have seen] a courteous and kind letter, and inserted in the newspapers an advertisement, correcting the mistake 4.

The observations of my friend Mr. Dempster 5 in a letter written to me, soon after he had read Dr. Johnson's book, are so just and liberal, that they cannot be too often repeated.

head, and not of the heart. He had no ill-will to the Scotch; for, if he had been conscious of that, he never would have thrown himself into the bosom of their country; and trusted to the protection of its remote inhabitants with a fearless confidence. His remark upon the nakedness of the country, from its being denuded of trees, was made after having travelled two hundred miles along the eastern coast, where certainly trees are not to be found near the road; and he said it was "a map of the road" which he gave. His disbelief of the authenticity of the poems ascribed to Ossian, a Highland bard, was confirmed in the course of his journey, by a very strict examination of the evidence offered for it; and although their authenticity was made too much a national point by the Scotch, there were many respectable persons in that country, who did not concur in this: so that his judgment upon the question ought not to be decried, even by those who differ from him. As to myself, I can only say, upon a subject now become very uninteresting, that when the fragments of Highland poetry first came out, I was much pleased with their wild peculiarity, and was one of those who subscribed to enable their editor, Mr. Macpherson, then a young man, to make a search in the Highlands and Hebrides for a long poem in the Erse language, which was reported to be preserved somewhere in those regions. But when there came forth an Epick poem in six books, with all the common circumstances "Upon the whole, the book cannot disof former compositions of that nature; and please, for it has no pretensions. The auwhen, upon an attentive examination of it, thour neither says he is a geographer, nor there was found a perpetual recurrence of an antiquarian, nor very learned in the histhe same images which appear in the frag-tory of Scotland, nor a naturalist, nor a fosments; and when no ancient manuscript, to authenticate the work, was deposited in any publick library, though that was insisted on as a reasonable proof, who could forbear to doubt?

Johnson's grateful acknowledgments of kindness received in the course of this tour completely refute the brutal reflections which have been thrown out against him, as if he had made an ungrateful return; and his delicacy in sparing in his book those, who, we find, from his letters to Mrs. Thrale, were just objects of censure 2, is much to be ad

[This is a distinction which the Editor is not sure that he understands. Did Mr. Boswell think that he improved the case by representing Johnson's dislike of Scotland as the result not of feeling but of reason? In truth, in the printed Jour:nal of his Tour, there is nothing that a fair and liberal Scotchman can or does complain of; but his conversation is full of the harshest and often most unjust sarcasms against the Scotch, nationally and individually.-ED.]

[The only person censured in these letters is Sir A. Macdonald, to whom Boswell no doubt

"There is nothing in the book, from beginning to end, that a Scotchman need to take amiss. What he says of the country is true; and his observations on the people are what must naturally occur to a sensible, observing, and reflecting inhabitant of a convenient metropolis, where a man on thirty pounds a year may be better accommodated with all the little wants of life, than Col or Sir Allan.

"I am charmed with his researches concerning the Erse language, and the antiquity of their manuscripts. I am quite convinced; and I shall rank Ossian and his Fingals and Oscars amongst the nursery tales, not the true history of our country, in all time to come,

silist. The manners of the people, and the face of the country, are all he attempts to describe, or seems to have thought of. Much were it to be wished, that they who have travelled into more remote, and of course more curious regions, had all possessed his good sense. Of the state of learning, his observations on Glasgow university show he has formed a very sound judgment. He understands our climate too; and he has accurately observed the changes, however slow and imperceptible to us, which Scotland has undergone, in consequence of the blessings of liberty and internal peace."

Mr. Knox, another native of Scotland, alludes, but whom his delicacy did not spare. See ante, p. 372.—ED.]

3

[See ante, p. 415.—ED.]
4 See ante, p. 469.-BoswELL.

[Boswell was so vehemently attacked by his countrymen, as if he were particeps criminis with Dr. Johnson, that he thought it expedient to produce these testimonia Scotorum in his own defence.-ED.]

who has since made the same tour, and pub-| most capital article, the character of the inlished an account of it, is equally liberal. habitants."

His private letters to Mrs. Thrale, written during the course of his journey, which therefore may be supposed to convey his genuine feelings at the time, abound in such benignant sentiment towards the people who showed him civilities, that no man whose temper is not very harsh and sour can retain a doubt of the goodness of his

"I have read," says he, "his book again and again, travelled with him from Berwick to Glenelg, through countries with which I am well acquainted; sailed with him from Glenelg to Rasay, Sky, Rum, Col, Mull, and Icolmkill, but have not been able to correct him in any matter of consequence. I have often admired the accuracy, the precision, and the justness of what he advances, re-heart. specting both the country and the people.

The Doctor has every where delivered his sentiments with freedom, and in many instances with a seeming regard for the benefit of the inhabitants, and the ornament of the country. His remarks on the want of trees and hedges for shade, as well as for shelter to the cattle, are well founded, and merit the thanks, not the illiberal censure of the natives. He also felt for the distresses of the Highlanders, and explodes with great propriety the bad management of the grounds, and the neglect of timber in the Hebrides.".

Having quoted Johnson's just compliments on the Rasay family, he says,

"On the other hand, I found this family equally lavish in their encomiums upon the Doctor's conversation, and his subsequent civilities to a young gentleman of that country, who, upon waiting upon him at London, was well received, and experienced all the attention and regard that a warm friend could bestow. Mr. Macleod having also been in London, waited upon the Doctor, who provided a magnificent and expensive entertainment in honour of his old Hebridean acquaintance."

And, talking of the military road by Fort Augustus, he says,

"By this road, though one of the most rugged in Great Britain, the celebrated Dr. Johnson passed from Inverness to the Hebride Isles. His observations on the country and people are extremely correct, judicious,

and instructive 1."

Mr. Tytler, the acute and able vindicator of Mary, Queen of Scots, in one of his letters to Mr. James Elphinstone, published in that gentleman's "Forty Years'. Correspondence," says,

"I read Dr. Johnson's Tour" with very great pleasure. Some few errors he has fallen into, but of no great importance, and those are lost in the numberless beauties of his work.

If I had leisure, I could perhaps point out the most exceptionable places; but at present I am in the country, and have not his book at hand. It is plain he meant to speak well of Scotland; and he has in my apprehension done us great honour in the

1 Page 103.-BOSWELL.

It is painful to recollect with what rancour he was assailed by numbers of shallow irritable North Britons, on account of his supposed injurious treatment of their country and countrymen, in his "Journey.” Had there been any just ground for such a charge, would the virtuous and candid Dempster have given his opinion of the book, in the terms in which I have quoted? Would the patriotic Knox 2 have spoken of it as he has done? Would Mr. Tytler, surely

a Scot, if ever Scot there were,"

have expressed himself thus? And let me add, that, citizen of the world as I hold myself to be, I have that degree of predilection for my natale so'um, nay, I have that just sense of the merit of an ancient nation, which has been ever renowned for its valour, which in former times maintained its independence against a powerful neighbour, and in modern times has been equally distinguished for its ingenuity and industry in civilized life, that I should have felt a generous indignation at any injustice done to it. Johnson treated Scotland no worse than he did even his best friends, whose characters he used to give as they appeared to him, both in light and shade. Some people, who had not exercised their minds sufficiently, condemned him for censuring his friends. But sir Joshua Reynolds, whose philosophical penetration and justness of thinking were not less known to those who lived with him, than his genius in his art admired by the world, explained his conduct thus:

"He was fond of discrimination, which he could not show without pointing out the bad as well as the good in every character; and as his friends were those whose characters he knew best, they afforded him the best opportunity for showing the acuteness of his judgment."

He expressed to his friend, Mr. Windham of Norfolk 3, his wonder at the extreme

2 I observed with much regret, while the first edition was passing through the press (August, 1790), that this ingenious gentleman is dead.— BOSWELL.

3 [The Right Honourable William Windham of Felbrigg, born 1750, died 1810. He cultivated Johnson's acquaintance for the last few years of

« PreviousContinue »