Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US, 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control. American law reports annotated - Page 4681925Full view - About this book
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1976 - 1102 pages
...Sisters, 268 US 510, 534-535 (1925), the protection held to have been unconstitutionally abridged was "the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the...upbringing and education of children under their control" (emphasis added) . See also Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 US 205, 232-233 (1972). Indeed, Village of Belle... | |
| Electronic journals - 1926 - 688 pages
...effect sought to abolish all elementary, private schools. The court held that the law " unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control," and deprives private schools of " business and property for which they claim protection." This c'se... | |
| Alfred Ernest Stearns - Boys - 1925 - 312 pages
...of the matter. "We think it entirely plain," runs the decision, "that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights guaranteed by the Constitution may not be abridged by legislation... | |
| Evolution - 1925 - 356 pages
...Meyer vs. Nebraska, 262 U S., Page 390, we think it is entirely plain that the act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights granted by the constitution may not be breached by legislation,... | |
| Education - 1926 - 862 pages
...without due process of law." In the opinion of the court, the challenged legislation "unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general... | |
| Electronic journals - 1926 - 1180 pages
...said, again through Judge McReynolds: " We think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control. . . . The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any... | |
| Albert Bushnell Hart - Almanacs, American - 1926 - 1214 pages
...applicable to private schools a law prohibiting the teaching of German. The Oregon act "unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control," and deprives private schools without due process of law of "business and property for which they claim... | |
| Cyrus Adler, Henrietta Szold - Jews - 1926 - 742 pages
...doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...up-bringing and education of children under their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights guaranteed by the Constitution may not be abridged by legislation... | |
| American Jewish Committee - Jews - 1926 - 164 pages
...doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights guaranteed by the Constitution may not be abridged by legislation... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1926 - 810 pages
...doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska^ 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 un/ reasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and ^ guardians to direct the upbringing and education of chil510 Opinion of the Court. dren under their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights guaranteed... | |
| |