American law reports annotated, Volume 391925 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 12
... land through its receiver , one who takes possession of such land under a tax title , without permission of the chancery court appointing the receiver , is in contempt of court . Young v . Vanhooser ( 1880 ) 6 Lea ( Tenn . ) 136 ...
... land through its receiver , one who takes possession of such land under a tax title , without permission of the chancery court appointing the receiver , is in contempt of court . Young v . Vanhooser ( 1880 ) 6 Lea ( Tenn . ) 136 ...
Page 127
... land to " C. M. Deaver and his heirs . " Immediate- ly following the description of the land and preceding the habendum clause of the deed are the following words : " Excepting a lifetime es- tate for my father , E. M. Deaver , Sr ...
... land to " C. M. Deaver and his heirs . " Immediate- ly following the description of the land and preceding the habendum clause of the deed are the following words : " Excepting a lifetime es- tate for my father , E. M. Deaver , Sr ...
Page 188
... land . 1. Where the parties to a deed have full knowledge of the facts upon which the grantor's interest in the land conveyed is based , but are mutual- ly mistaken as to the interest of such grantor in the land , because of an ...
... land . 1. Where the parties to a deed have full knowledge of the facts upon which the grantor's interest in the land conveyed is based , but are mutual- ly mistaken as to the interest of such grantor in the land , because of an ...
Page 190
... land by the deed of March 1 , 1913. To support this con- tention the plaintiff calls attention to the following evidence : First , that the grantees not only negotiated with David Barnett for the purchase of the land , but also ...
... land by the deed of March 1 , 1913. To support this con- tention the plaintiff calls attention to the following evidence : First , that the grantees not only negotiated with David Barnett for the purchase of the land , but also ...
Page 191
... land was delivered to David Barnett , but was divided between David Barnett and the children of Nancy Barnett . Eleventh , that the procedure pro- vided by § 22 of the Act of April 26 , 1906 , 34 Stat . at L. 145 , chap . 1876 , 3 Fed ...
... land was delivered to David Barnett , but was divided between David Barnett and the children of Nancy Barnett . Eleventh , that the procedure pro- vided by § 22 of the Act of April 26 , 1906 , 34 Stat . at L. 145 , chap . 1876 , 3 Fed ...
Common terms and phrases
Acci accidental means act of bankruptcy affirmed alleged amendment appear Asso Bank Bankr bees cause of action charged child claim common-law common-law marriage Constitution contempt of court contract corporation court of equity creditors damages David Barnett death decree of divorce defendant effect entitled equity erty evidence ex rel fact faith and credit fendant full faith granted ground husband injury interest Iowa judgment jurisdiction jury landlord later decisions lease liability Lord Campbell's Act marriage matrimonial domicil ment Misc mortgage N. J. Eq N. Y. Supp Ohio Okla opinion parties person petition plaintiff plaintiff in error possession premises question reason receiver recover Reprint rule service of process Stat statute suit Supplementing annotation supra tained tenant tion town of Kiowa trust United valid void wife York
Popular passages
Page 576 - Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, that whensoever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful act, neglect, or default, and the act, neglect, or default is such as would (if death had not ensued) have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof...
Page 577 - ... resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves, or other equipment.
Page 213 - It is a general and undisputed proposition of law that a municipal corporation possesses and can exercise the following powers, and no others : First, those granted in express words; second, those necessarily or fairly implied in or incident to the powers expressly granted ; third, those essential to the accomplishment of the declared objects and purposes of the corporation — not simply convenient, but indispensable.
Page 577 - Columbia and any of the states or territories and any foreign nation or nations shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce...
Page 587 - Territories and any foreign nation or nations, shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative...
Page 310 - The commission or any party may in any investigation cause the depositions of witnesses residing within or without the state to be taken in the manner prescribed by law for like depositions in civil actions in circuit courts.
Page 585 - When the death of a person not being a minor is caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another, his heirs or personal representatives may maintain an action for damages against the person causing the death...
Page 478 - Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.
Page 256 - Acts of bankruptcy by a person shall consist of his having (1) conveyed, transferred, concealed, or removed, or permitted to be concealed or removed, any part of his property, with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud his creditors or any of them...
Page 468 - Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US, 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.