more for their intelligence and business capacity than for any special knowledge of the subtleties of law, has been kept in view, and the use of legal phraseology avoided as much as possible. It is hoped that this course will enable the reader to understand more perfectly than otherwise a Statute which is unusually complex and difficult. A number of forms, in addition to those provided for in the Statute, have been added, including forms of proceedings on certiorari, objections to the granting of licenses, notices under the clauses respecting the sale of liquor to minors, inebriates and others, all of which it is thought will be useful and which may prevent the failure of many an action on the ground of defective preliminary proceedings. The law respecting the rights and liabilities of inn-keepers and lodginghouse keepers will also be found embodied in the book, as also the cases under The Temperance Act, 1864, and The Canada Temperance Act, 1878. The index has been carefully prepared, and in addition to its other uses, will be found to contain an alphabetical table of the words and phrases, the judicial meaning of which is given throughout the book, so that it forms a tolerably complete legal lexicon. Acknowledgments are due to Mr. James Bicknell, Barrister-at-Law, and also to other members of the legal profession for very valuable assistance in the compilation of the work. HAMILTON, 10th July, 1891. Blades v. Lawrence, 27. Blair's Case, 159. Blackburn v. Garland, 280. 66 v. Green, 27. Blackmore v. London & S.W. Ry. Co., 224. Blackwell v. England, 38. Blake v. Beech, 238, 324. Blouin v. Cor. of Quebec, 2. Blyth v. Birmingham Water Works Co. 107. Board of Trade v. Black, 152. Bond v. Conmee, 223, 241, 247, 297. 66 v. Evans, 124, 175. Bonham's Case, 163. Boon and The Co. of Halton, 327. Bosley v. Davies, 124, 174, 177, 179. Bowie, in re, ex p. Breull, 38. Bows v. Fenwick, 21, 38, 250. Bridges v. Potts, 98. 66 v. State, 77. Bright v. City of Toronto, 107, 112, 220. Bristol Athenæum, in re, 44. Bristol Water Works Co. v. Uren, 133. Brockaway v. Mut. Benefit Life Ins. Co., 278. Brockville Election Case, 135. Brodie v. Cor. of Bowmanville, 10, 53, 67, 90, 100, 126, 220. Brooke v. Hook, 27. Brophy and the Cor. of Gananoque, 326. Braunstein v. Accidental Ins. Co., 90, 144. Brown v. Duncan. 110. Brown and Wallace, in re, 220, 263. Bryant v. Reading, 34, 212, 263. Candy v. Hanmore, 154. Canada Tem. Act, The, 312. Canada Tem. Act, 1878, and Co. Perth, in re, 312. Canada Tem. Act, 1878, and Co. Kent, in re, 312. Cannan v. Bryce, 110. Cavendish v. Cavendish, 44. Challand v. Bray, 179. Chamberlain v. King, 48, 223. Chambers v. Smith, 20. Chaney v. Payne, 247. Chapman v. Rand, 312. 66 v. Robinson, 32. Chattillon v. Can. M. Fire Ins. Co., v. Smith, 158. Conmee v. C. P. Ry. Co., 216. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Connolly, in re, 259. Cooke v. New River Co., 68, 133. Cooper Man. Co. v. Ferguson, 77. Cor. of St. Vincent v. Grier, 155. Cox v. James, 177. 66 V. Harvey, 185. 66 v. Hopkins, 73. v. Rees, 80. Day v. Bather, 172. Day and The Cor. of Storrington, 326. Deakin v. Lane, 64. Deal v. Schofield. 78, 115. De Beauvior v. Welch, 257. De St. Aubyn v. Lafrance, 2. Dicker v. Angerstein, 258. Digge v. Higgs, 180. Dillon v. Cunningham, 64. Dimes v. Grand Junction Canal Co., 80. Dixon v. Walker, 105. Dobie v. Temporalities Board, 2. Doe v. Laming, 6. Dodd v. Middleton, 226. Dodds v. Shepherd, 212. Dominion Bank v. Cowan, 88. Donnelly v. Cor. of Clarke, 90. Doty v. Lawson, 182. Dow v. Gould Mining Co., 39. Drope v. Cor. of Hamilton, 91. Druitt v. Christ Church, 256. Duck v. Bates, 26, 29, 37, 152, 185. Durham Ry. Co. v. Walker, 107. Dyson v. Mason, 179. |