« PreviousContinue »
OSE OF TBE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, AND JAY PROFESSOR
OP LAW IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAX.
WITI CONSIDERABLE ADDITIOXS, GIVING THE RESULTS OF THE RECENT CASES.
LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY.
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.
In the Preface to the first edition of this work, the author stated its purpose to be, to furnish to the practitioner and the student of the law such a presentation of elementary constitutional principles as should serve, with the aid of its references to judicial decisions, legal treatises, and historical events, as a convenient guide in the examination of questions respecting the constitutional limitations which rest upon the power of the several State legislatures. In the accomplishment of that purpose, the author further stated that he had faithfully endeavored to give the law as it had been settled by the authorities, rather than to present his own views. At the same time, he did not attempt to deny — what he supposed would be sufficiently apparent — that he had written in full sympathy with all those restraints which the caution of the fathers had imposed upon the exercise of the powers of government, and with faith in the checks and balances of our republican system, and in correct conclusions by the general public sentiment, rather than in reliance upon a judicious, prudent, and just exercise of authority, when confided without restriction to any one man or body of men, whether sitting in legislative capacity or judicial. In this sympathy and faith, he had written of jury trials and the other safeguards to personal liberty, of liberty of the press and of vested rights; and he had also endeavored to point out that there are on all sides definite limitations which circumscribe the legislative authority, independent of the specific restrictions which the people impose by their State constitutions. But while not predisposed to discover in any part of our system the rightful existence of any unlimited power, created by the Constitution, neither on the other hand had he designed to advance new doctrines, or to do more than state clearly and with reasonable conciseness the principles to be deduced from the judicial decisions.
The unexpected favor with which the work has been received having made a new edition necessary, the author has reviewed every part of it with care, but without finding occasion to change
in any important particular the conclusions before given. Further reflection has only tended to confirm him in his previous views of the need of constitutional restraints at every point where agents are to exercise the delegated authority of the people; and he is gratified to observe that in the judicial tribunals the tendency is not in the direction of a disregard of these restraints. The reader will find numerous additional references to new cases and other authorities; and some modifications have been made in the phraseology of the text, with a view to clearer and more accurate expression of his views. Trusting that these modifications and additions will be found not without value, he again submits his work “ to the judgment of an enlightened and generous profession.”
THOMAS M. COOLEY. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN,
ANN ARBOR, July, 1871.
PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION.
The second edition being exhausted, the author, in preparing a third, has endeavored to give full references to such decisions as have recently been made or reported, having a bearing upon the points discussed. It will be seen on consulting the notes that the number of such decisions is large, and that some of them are of no little importance.
THOMAS M. COOLEY. UNIVERSITY OF Michigan,
Ann Arbor, December, 1873.
PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION.
New topics in State Constitutional Law are not numerous ; but such as are suggested by recent decisions have been discussed in this edition, and it is believed considerable value has been added to the work by further references to adjudged cases.
THOMAS M. COOLEY. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN,
ANN ARBOR, April, 1878.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Definition of a state, nation, people, sovereignty, and sovereign state
Removal of causes from State courts ; decisions of State courts to be
Restrictions upon the States