Page images
PDF
EPUB

Entered according to the act of Congress, in the year 1879, by AUGUSTUS N. MARTIN,

In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

Rec. Oct.

22,1879

PRINTED AND BOUND
BY THE

INDIANAPOLIS SENTINEL CO.

ELECTROTYPED AT THE

INDIANAPOLIS

ELECTROTYPE FOUNDRY.

KETCHUM & WANAMAKER.

TABLE OF THE CASES

......................

........................

.....386

..............

Ætna Ins. Co. v. Meyers .... 238 Carnahan et al., Jones et al. v ...... 229
Albin y. The State..

598 Carpenter, Ruschaupt v
Alvord et al. v. Smith................ 58 Chapman v. McCrea et al.......
Anderson, Board of Trustees of City of Goshen v. Kern...... ........468
the LaGrange Collegiate Insti- Clark et al. v. Carey

105

..... ......... ...........367 Coan v. Grimes.

21

Andis v. Davis ........................... 17 Corporation of Bluffton et al. v.

Angle, Noah v .......

425 Silver

....................... 262

Arthurhultz, Domestic Sewing Covey, Adm'r, v. Neff..

391

Machine Co. v. .......

.322 Craig v. Ensey

..140

Aveline, Hartman V ................. 344 Craig et ux. v Donovan. ...513

Cropsey v. Henderson, Auditor of

Baker v. Flint ........

137 State.

.268

Batterson v. The State...
531 Cuneo v. Bessoni

.....524
Beam et al, Indianapolis, Peru
and Chicago R. W. Co. V........

......490 Dahn et al., Nicklaus et al. v ...... 87
Bescher v. The State, ex rel. Ham- Davenport v. King et al...

64

mann.......

....................302 Davis, Andis v........

17

Bessoni, Cuneo v.. ..............

52+ | DeArmond et al. v. Stoneman

Bevis et ux, v. Heflin et al., ...129 Detrick et al, Canaday v...... ......

485

Bluffton, Corporation of, et al. v. Dickey, Young v

31

Silver. ....

262 Dickson et al. v. Indianapolis

Board of Comm’rs of Harrison Cotton Manufacturing Co. 9

Co. v. Leslie.

...492 Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v.

Board of Comm’rs of Jennings Arthurhultz

.322

Co. v. Verbarg

...107 Donovan, Craig et ux. V.... .........513
Board of Comm'rs of Miami Co., Dufour, The State v...

The State, ex rel. Godfroy, v. .497

Board of Trustees of the La-

Egolf v. Bryant et al. ...... ........... 365

Eldridge et ux., Scarry et ux, v... 44

Grange Collegiate Institute v.

Anderson.

140

Ensey, Cruig v

367

Evansville, Cairo and Memphis

Boyd et al., The State, ex rel.

Share et al., v

Steam Packet Co. v. Wildman..870

4281

Brattain, Headrick v .................438 Finney et al., Peoples Savings

Bryant et al., Egolf v ........365

Bank of Evansville v .........

.....460

Bundy v. Ridenour et al.............. 406 Finton, Reed v.

.288

First National Bank of Aurora,
Cahill, Louisville, New Albany

Pate et al v............................254

and Chicago R. W. Co. V .........

3401 Flint, Baker v .........

.137

Cain v. Hanna et al. .................. 408 Foster, Jeffersonville, Madison

Caldwell v. The State. ......

283

and Indianapolis R. R. Co. v.... 342

Callahan v. The State..

198 Fowler. Jackson v

85

Camplin, Patton et al. v.............512 Foxwell v. The State ....

................539

Canaday v. Detrick et al. .485 Froelke. McCarthy V.................

507

Carey, Clark et al, V................ 105 Fry v. The State......

......................552
479

............567
............ ... 363

.., 412

Galbraith et al, Sidener v. ......... 89 Maddox, Stewart et al. v ........... 51

Gardiner, Tucker et al. v .........., 299 Marsh v. Terrell

Garsh wiler et al., Vandever et al Matthews, Hayes et al. v ........

..185 May v. Pavey et al...

4

Gilchrist v. Gough et al ...576 McCarthy v. Froelke........ .507

Goodwine v. Stephens

...112 McCrea et al., Chapman V........... 360

Goshen, City of, v. Kern .....

.........468 McDonald v. The State ..............544
Gough et al, Gilchrist v.. .576 McKay v. Wakefield

27
Gould et al. v. Hayden et al........443 McKinney, Woodrow et al. v 205
Pate et al
..273 Merrick v. The State...

327
Grimes, Coan v. ......

21 Meyer, State, ex rel. Attorney Gen-

Guetig v. The State

eral, v.

Gundy v. The State.

528 Meyers, Ætna Ins. Co. v

Miller v. Muir, Adm'r.

496

Hanna et al., Cain v..........

...408 Miller, The State, ex rel. Mason, v.475

Harlen v. Watson et al ........ 143 Miller, Wright, Adm'r, v. .220
Harness et al. v. Harness et al...... 1 Miller et al. v. The State, ex rel.
Hartman v. Aveline
344 Jerauld

219
Hauser et al., The State, ex rel.

Mitchell v. The State...

276
The City of Columbus, v......... 155 Mitchell y. The State.........

Hayden et al, Gould et al. v...... 443 Muir, Adm'r, Miller V................. 496

Hayes et al. v. Matthews .....

412 Murdock et al., Suits v ....., 73
Headrick v. Brattain .....

438
Heberer et ux., Unfried v. ........... 67 Neely, Nelson et al. v

.194
Heflin et al, Bevis et ux. V.......... 129 Nees, Tell City Furniture Co v.... 245
Henderson, Auditor of State, Neff, Covey, Adm'r, v

.391
Cropsey v...
............ 268 Nelson et al. v. Neely

.................194
Hershman v. Hershman.. 451 Nickens, Polk v

439
Hinkle, Holmes et al. v...............518 Nicklaus et al. v. Dahn et al........
Holdridge et al , Sowle v............. 213 Noah v. Angle..

.......... .................425

Holmes et al. v. Hinkle

Howard, The State v... ........

502 O'Brien v. The State ........

Hubbard, Titlow et ux, V... .........
6 Ohm v. Yung

.432

Huff, Ex'r, v. Krause, Adm'r...... 396

Humphrey v. Thorn et al ..296 Page et al., The State, ex rel. Page,

Guardian, v...

. 209

Indianapolis Cotton Manufactur- Pate et ai. v. First National Bank

ing Co., Dickson et al, v. ........ 9 of Aurora

........254

Indianapolis, Peru and Chicago R. Pate et al., Griffin v ...................273
W. Co. v. Beam et al.............

..490 Patton et al. v. Camplin...
Pavey et al, May v

4

Jackson v. Fowler .............

85 Peachee v. The State .................

399

Jefferson ville, Madison and Indi- Pedigo, Rush v.

479
anapolis R. R. Co. v. Foster.....842 Peoples Savings Bank of Evans-

Jeffries v. Rowe

592 ville v. Finney et al..... 460

Jenkins v.Jenkins, Adm'r, et al.. .120 Peterson et ux, Smith et al. v......243
Jenkins et al. v. Jenkins
415 Polk v. Nickens ....

439
Jones et al v. Carnahan et al 229
Judah et al., Kendel, Adm'r, v.... 291 Randles et al. v. Randles et al...... 93

Reed v. Finton

Kendel, Adm’r. v. Judah et al.....291 Ridenour et al., Bundy v...........

406

Kern, City of Goshen v............ 468 Richardson v The State.............

192

Kidwell v. The State

384 Robinius v. The State..

235

King et al., Davenport v... 64 Rowe, Jeffries v

592
Krause, Adm’r, Huff, Ex’r, v....... 396 Ruschaupt v Carpenter......

359

Rush v. Pedigo ........

Leslie, Board of Comm’rs of Har-

rison Co. v...

492 Scarry et ux. v. Eldridge et ux..... 44

Louisville, New Albany and Chi- Schafer v. Smith..

cago R. W. Co. v. Cahill..........340 Seamer, Zeigelmueller v..........

....... 226

... 488

.......

Short v. The State .....
376 State, Wagner v

..250

Sidener v. Galbraith et al

89 State, Watson v.

........................548

Silver, Corporation of Bluffton et State, Woods v.

353

al. v

262 Stephens, Good wine v

.112

Smith, Alvord et al, v.

58 Stephens, The State v.

Smith, Schafer y

.226 Stevens, Toledo, Wabash and

Smith et al. v. Peterson et ux ...... 243 Western R. W. Co. v
Sowle v. Holdridge et al ............. 213 Stewart et al. v. Maddox

51
Starck v. The State

..285 Stewart et al., Wilson, Adm'r, v.294
State v. Dufour ........................567 Stoneman, DeArmond et al. v....386
State v. Howard
502 Suits v. Murdock et al. .....

73

State v. Stephens. .......................542 Swift v. The State, ex rel. Clark... 81

State v. Zeitler....... .........

State, Albin v

598 Tell City Furniture Co. v. Nees... 245

State, Batterson V .............

531 Terrell, Marsh v

State, Caldwell v.......

283 Thorn et al., Humphrey v

State, Callahan v...... •
...... 198 Titlow et ux. v. Hubbard.

6
State, ex rel. Attorney General, Toledo, Wabash and Western R.
v. Meyer
33 W. Co. v. Stevens.

337
State, ex rel. Clark, Swift v 81 Trustees of Philippi Church, Wiles
State, ex rel. Godfroy, v. Board

....206

of Comm’rs of Miami Co 497 Tucker et al. v. Gardiner .......... .299

State, ex rel. Hammann, Bescher v.302

State, ex rel. Jerauid, Miller et al. Umphrey v. The State ...... .223

v.........

.219 Unfried v. Heberer et ux

State, ex rel. Mason, v. Miller.......475
State, ex rel. Page, Guardian, v. Vand ver et al. v. Garsh wiler et al.185
Page et al...........

.209 Veri arg, Board of Comm' rs of
State, ex rel. Share et al., v. Boyd Jennings Co. v ........................ 107

428
State, ex rel. The City of Colum- Wagner v. The State...

.............. 250
bus, v. Hauser et al. ............... 155 Wakefield, McKay v .................. 27
State, Foxwell v.......................539 Watson v. The State

................. 548
State, Fry V ............................552 Watson et al., Harlen v

143

State, Guetig v ............................278 Wildman, Evansville, Cairo and

State,

Gundy v

Memphis Steam Packet Co.v.....370

State, Kidwell v ........................

384 Wiles v. Trustees of Philippi

State, McDonald v.....................544

Church

206

State, Merrick v

327/ Wilson, Adm'r, v. Stewart et al .....294
State, Mitchell v .........

..............276 Woodrow et al. v. McKinney. 205

State, Mitchell v

.......................574 Woods v. The State..

353

State, O'Brien v ....................

..242 Wright, Adm’r, v. Miller ...........220

State, Peachee V............. ..........

..399

State, Richardson v ...... ..........

..192 Young v. Dickey.

31

State, Robinius v...... ..................235 Young, Ohm v... ..............
State, Short v ...........................

376

State, Starck v.........................

285 Zeigelmueller v. Seamer............. 488

State, Umphrey V......................

223 Zeitler, The State v..........

........ ......441

........

[ocr errors]

TABLE OF THE CASES

CITED IN THIS VOLUME.

[ocr errors]

Abbott v. Zeigler, 9 Ind. 511 .4787 Beal v. Ray, 17 Ind. 554 ....598

Abrams v. Smith, 8 Blackf 95....332 Beauchamp v. State, 6 Blackf. 299.559

Adams v. State, 11 Ind. 304....... 278 Beavers v. State, 58 Ind. 530...... 331

Adams v. State, 42 Ind. 373. 599 Beekman v. Frost, 18 Johns. 544...589

Adams Ex. Co. v. Hill, 43 Ind. 157.208 Bebler v. Weyburn, 59 Ind. 143... 73

Adams, In re, 7 Law Rep. 386 353 Bell v. State, 42 Ind. 335...... .380

Aldridge v. Montgomery, 9 Ind. Bellefontaine R. W. Co. v. Reed,

.525 33 Ind. 476..

..341

Alexander v. Thomas, 25 Ind. 268.537 Bellefontaine R. W. Co. v. Su-

Alford v. Baker, 53 Ind. 279 .339

man, 29 Ind. 40

.339

American Ex. Co. v. Haire, 21 Belton v. Smith, 45 Ind. 291 197

Ind. 4

362 Bentley v. Dunkle, 57 Ind. 374....154

Amidon v. Guff, 24 Ind. 128 ..458 Bethell v. Bethell, 54 Ind. 428.....517

Anderson v. Greensburgh, etc., Co., Binds v. State, 46 Ind. 311.....551,599

48 Ind. 467

143 Bissot v. State, 53 Ind. 408....

Anderson v. State, 28 Ind. 22. 330 Black v. Coan, 48 Ind. 385. 408

Anthony v. Gilbert, 4 Blackf. 348. 58 Black v. State, 57 Ind. 109.

Armstrong v. McLaughlin, 49 Ind. Blaine v. Ship Charles Carter, 4

370......

Cranch, 333

234

Ashton's Appeal, 73 Pa. State, 153.584 Blizzard v. Bross, 56 Ind. 74.......332

Ault v. Goodrich, 4 Russ. 430 ....... 15 Blossom v. Ball, 32 Ind. 115.. 457

Aurora, etc., Ins. Co. v. Johnson, Board, etc., v. Bright, 18 Ind. 93...208

46 Ind. 315 ..............

... 332 Board, etc., v. Mason, 9 Ind. 97 ... 250

Aurora, etc., Ins. Co. v. Kranich, Board, etc., v.

Spitler, 13 Ind. 235..266

36 Mich. 289.

.241 Board, etc., v, Stropes, 58 Ind. 54.496

Austin v. Willson's Ex'r, 21 Ind. Boil v. Simms, 60 İnd. 162 .489

252..

.....135 Bosseker v. Cramer, 18 Ind. 44....334

Bottorf v. Smith, 7 Ind. 673.. 517

Babcock v. Jordan, 24 Ind. 14.....584 Boxley v. Collins. 4 Blackf. 320... 334

Bacon v. Cropsey, 7 N. Y. 199.....234 Boyce v. People, 55 N. Y. 614

Bacon v. Western, etc., Co., 53 Ind. Boyd v. Wade, 58 Ind. 138. 332

229

.422 Bradley v.

Bradley, 45 Ind. 67.....483

Bailey v. Boyd, 59 Ind. 292. ... 364 Bradley v. State, 31 Ind. 492. 280

Bailey v State, 39 Ind. 438.......... 572 Bradshaw v. Warner, 54 Ind. 58..325

Bailey v. State, 52 Ind. 462 .......... 286 Branham v. Record, 42 Ind. 181... 142

Bailey v. Troxell, 43 Ind. 432...... 375 Brannon v. May, 42 Ind. 92.. 584

Bales v. State, 15 Ind. 321, 212 Breckenridge v. McAfee,54 Ind.141.517

Ball v. Balfe, 41 Ind. 221

266 Briggs v. Wardwell, 10 Mass. 356.234
Bank, etc., V.

Patton, 5 How. Miss. Broker v. Scobey, 56 Ind. 588......282
200

...450 Brooks v. Harris, 41 Ind. 390.

Bargis v. Farrar, 45 Ind. 41. 398 Brown v. Clarke, 4 How. 4 450

Barker v. State, 48 Ind. 163 282 Brown v. Duke, 46 Ind. 343.. .441

Barnard v. Campau, 29 Mich. 162.589 Brown v. Kirkman, 1 (), S. 116....589

Barnett v. Bullett, 11 Ind. 310..... 249 Brunner v. Brennan, 49 Ind. 98... 25

Barnett v. Juday, 38 Ind. 86 ........301 Brutton v. State, 4 Ind. 601... ..443

Barney v. McCarty, 15 Iowa, 510..589 Brydon v. Campbell, 40 Md. 331.589

Barton v. Allbright, 29 Ind. 489..487 Buckner v. State, 56 Ind. 207...... 335
Batty v. Fout, 54 Ind. 482 .......... 72 Bunts v. Cole, 7 Blackf. 265 ........111

.........

...........

.....172

« PreviousContinue »