Entered according to the act of Congress, in the year 1879, by AUGUSTUS N. MARTIN,

In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

Nec. Oct. 22, 1879

PRINTED AND BOUND

BY THE

INDIANAPOLIS SENTINEL CO.

ELECTROTYPED AT THE

INDIANAPOLIS

ELECTROTYPE FOUNDRY.

KETCHUM & WANAMAKER.

TABLE OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

............

Etna Ins. Co. v. Meyers....
Albin v. The State.....

238 Carnahan et al., Jones et al. v...... 229
598 Carpenter, Ruschaupt v..............359

Alvord et al. v. Smith................ 58 Chapman v. McCrea et al............ 360

Anderson, Board of Trustees of City of Goshen v. Kern..............468

the LaGrange Collegiate Insti- Clark et al. v. Carey ........................... ..................... 105

............... ........................... ...................367 Coan v. Grimes.

tute v

Silver

.....

Andis v. Davis ............... ........... 17 Corporation of Bluffton et al. v.
Angle, Noah v.......................... 425
Arthurhultz, Domestic Sewing Covey, Adm'r, v. Neff.
Machine Co. V................... ................ ........................... ..322 Craig v. Ensey
Aveline, Hartman v.................. 344 Craig et ux. v Donovan.
Cropsey v. Henderson, Auditor of

21

262

391

......140

...513

137 State..

531 Cuneo v. Bessoni.

.................

.....524

Baker v. Flint........

Batterson v. The State.....
Beam et al, Indianapolis, Peru
and Chicago R. W. Co. v.........490 Dahn et al., Nicklaus et al. v...... 87
Bescher v. The State, ex rel. Ham- Davenport v. King et al.............. 64
...302 Davis, Andis v.

mann....

Bessoni, Cuneo v..

........... ......

.....

524 DeArmond et al. v. Stoneman

Bevis et ux. v. Heflin et al...........129 Detrick et al, Canaday v............485

Bluffton, Corporation of, et al. v.

Silver.

.... 262

17

.....386

Cahill, Louisville, New Albany
and Chicago R. W. Co. v......... 340 Flint, Baker v.

Cain v. Hanna et al......

Caldwell v. The State.......

.288

..137

Callahan v. The State........................... 198 Fowler, Jackson v.

Camplin, Patton et al. v.......... ...

512 Foxwell v. The State...................................

Canaday v. Detrick et al.
485 Froelke, McCarthy v.........................................

Carey, Clark et al. V............................ .................

105 Fry v. The State........................ 552

..........

Galbraith et al, Sidener v.......... 89, Maddox, Stewart et al. v.

Gardiner, Tucker et al. v

Garshwiler et al., Vandever et al

Gilchrist v. Gough et al..............576 McCarthy v. Froelke....................

Good wine v. Stephens

Goshen, City of, v. Kern............

Gough et al, Gilchrist v..

Gould et al. v. Hayden et al........443 McKinney, Woodrow et al. v...... 205

Griffin v. Pate et al ..................273 Merrick v. The State...

51

299 Marsh v. Terrell
Matthews, Hayes et al. v........

.....185 May v. Pavey et al...

363

...412

4

.507

................

.............112 McCrea et al., Chapman v...........360
468 McDonald v. The State............

..576 McKay v. Wakefield

..544

27

327

Grimes, Coan v.......

Guetig v. The State.

......

............ 278

528 Meyers, Etna Ins. Co. v

Miller v. Muir, Adm'r.

21 Meyer, State, ex rel. Attorney Gen-

eral, v.

33

............238

496

Gundy v. The State......

...220
Hanna et al., Cain v..................408 Miller, The State, ex rel. Mason, v.475
143 Miller, Wright, Adm'r, v. .....

Harlen v. Watson et al

Harness et al. v. Harness et al...... 1 Miller et al. v. The State, ex rel.
Hartman v. Aveline

Jerauld

Mitchell v. The State.....................................

The City of Columbus, v.........155 Mitchell y. The State..

Hayden et al, Gould et al. v...... 443 Muir, Adm'r, Miller v................

412 Murdock et al., Suits v............. .........................

Hayes et al. v. Matthews...........

Headrick v. Brattain........

Heberer et ux., Unfried v............

Heflin et al, Bevis et ux. v.......... 129 Nees, Tell City Furniture Co v....245

of State, Neff, Covey, Adm'r, v

Henderson, Auditor

268 Nelson et al. v. Neely..

Cropsey v...
Hershman v. Hershman..............451 Nickens, Polk v
518 Nicklaus et al. v. Dahn et al........

Hinkle, Holmes et al. V.........................

213 Noah v. Angle..

Holdridge et al, Sowle v.............

Holmes et al. v. Hinkle
.............518

Howard, The State v............ .....

Hubbard, Titlow et ux. v............
Huff, Ex'r, v. Krause, Adm'r......396|
Humphrey v. Thorn et al

Leslie, Board of Comm'rs of Har-
rison Co. v........

Louisville, New Albany and Chi-

cago R. W. Co. v. Cahill.......... 340 Seamer, Zeigelmueller v..............

Scarry et ux. v. Eldridge et ux.....

Schafer v. Smith..

44

226

488

58 Stephens, The State v.

226 Stevens, Toledo, Wabash

243 Western R. W. Co. v

542

and

..337

51

Smith et al. v. Peterson et ux.......

Sowle v. Holdridge et al.............. 213 Stewart et al. v. Maddox

Starck v. The State

State v. Dufour

State v. Howard

State v. Stephens.

......................

State v. Zeitler................

State, Albin v

State, Batterson V............

State, Caldwell v.......

State, Callahan v.......

State, ex rel. Attorney General,

v. Meyer

.....

..... .....

..285 Stewart et al., Wilson, Adm'r, v.294

567 Stoneman, DeArmond et al. v.....386

502 Suits v. Murdock et al......

73

.542 Swift v. The State, ex rel. Clark... 81

441

598 Tell City Furniture Co. v. Nees...245

531 Terrell, Marsh v
...............363

283 Thorn et al., Humphrey v......... .296

198 Titlow et ux. v. Hubbard.

....

Toledo, Wabash and Western R.
33 W. Co. v. Stevens
81 Trustees of Philippi Church, Wiles

State, ex rel. Clark, Swift v
State, ex rel. Godfroy, v. Board
of Comm'rs of Miami Co 497

State, ex rel. Hammann, Bescher v.302

State, ex rel. Jerauld, Miller et al.

V..........

..219

State, ex rel. Mason, v. Miller......475

State, ex rel. Page, Guardian, v.

Page et al......

.209

V......

6

337

.......206

Tucker et al. v. Gardiner.......... .299

Umphrey v. The State.......

***. *........ 223

Unfried v. Heberer et ux

.............. 67

Vand ver et al. v. Garsh wiler et al, 185

Veri arg, Board of Comm' rs of

Jennings Co. v...... ...... ...........107

State, ex rel. The City of Colum- Wagner v. The State................. 250

bus, v. Hauser et al.......

155 Wakefield, McKay v......................................

State, Foxwell V........................ ......................... ................ 539 Watson v. The State

State, ex rel. Share et al., v. Boyd

et al......

.428

27

548
143

206

353

.....552 Watson et al., Harlen v.

........278 Wildman, Evansville, Cairo and

..528

Memphis Steam Packet Co. v.....370

384 Wiles v. Trustees of Philippi

State, McDonald v.....................544 Church
State, Merrick V........................................... .........................
327 Wilson, Adm'r, v. Stewart et al.....294
State, Mitchell v
.276 Woodrow et al. v. McKinney 205
State, Mitchell v..
................ ......................... ................574 Woods v. The State..
State, O'Brien v ......................... .................. ................
242 Wright, Adm'r, v. Miller...........220

State, Peachee v........................399

State, Richardson v......

State, Robinius V.................. .........................................

State, Short v ....................... ....................... ......................

State, Starck v............................. ................ .......................

285 Zeigelmueller v. Seamer.............488

State, Umphrey v......................... .............. ...... 223 Zeitler, The State v....................441

31

.....432

TABLE OF THE CASES

CITED IN THIS VOLUME.

.525

....598

...341

Abbott v. Zeigler, 9 Ind. 511.......478] Beal v. Ray, 17 Ind. 554

Abrams v. Smith, 8 Blackf 95....332 Beauchamp v. State, 6 Blackf. 299.559

Adams v. State, 11 Ind. 304..... .278 Beavers v. State, 58 Ind. 530...... 331

Adams v. State, 42 Ind. 373.. 599 Beekman v. Frost, 18 Johns. 544...589

Adams Ex. Co. v. Hill, 43 Ind. 157.208 Behler v. Weyburn, 59 Ind. 143... 73

Adams, In re, 7 Law Rep. 386 353 Bell v. State, 42 Ind. 335...... 380

Aldridge v. Montgomery, 9 Ind. Bellefontaine R. W. Co. v. Reed,

302......

33 Ind. 476...

Alexander v. Thomas, 25 Ind. 268.537 Bellefontaine R. W. Co. v. Su-

Alford v. Baker, 53 Ind. 279

man, 29 Ind. 40

American Ex. Co. v. Haire,

Belton v. Smith, 45 Ind. 291 197

Bentley v. Dunkle, 57 Ind. 374....154

Bethell v. Bethell, 54 Ind. 428.....517

Binns v. State, 46 Ind. 311.....551,599

Bissot v. State, 53 Ind. 408......... 330

Black v. Coan, 48 Ind. 385

Black v. State, 57 Ind. 109.

Blaine v. Ship Charles Carter, 4

Cranch, 333

Ind. 4

.339

21

362

..458

......

143

Amidon v. Gaff, 24 Ind. 128

Anderson v. Greensburgh, etc., Co.,

48 Ind. 467

Anderson v. State, 28 Ind. 22. 330

Anthony v. Gilbert, 4 Blackf. 348. 58
Armstrong v. McLaughlin, 49 Ind.
370......

Ashton's Appeal, 73 Pa. State, 153.584

Ault v. Goodrich, 4 Russ. 430...... 15

Aurora, etc., Ins. Co. v. Johnson,

46 Ind. 315

...451

Aurora, etc., Ins. Co. v. Kranich,

36 Mich. 289

Austin v. Willson's Ex'r, 21 Ind.

...........

.332

..241

...............135

....

339

408

278

234

457

Blizzard v. Bross, 56 Ind. 74.......332

Blossom v. Ball, 32 Ind. 115..

Board, etc., v. Bright, 18 Ind. 93...208

Board, etc., v. Mason, 9 Ind. 97...250

Board, etc., v. Spitler, 13 Ind. 235..266

Board, etc., v. Stropes, 58 Ind. 54.496

Boil v. Simms, 60 İnd. 162

Bosseker v. Cramer, 18 Ind. 44....334

Bottorf v. Smith, 7 Ind. 673.. 517

Boxley v. Collins. 4 Blackf. 320...334

252.........

Babcock v. Jordan, 24 Ind. 14.....584

Bacon v. Cropsey, 7 N. Y. 199.....234 Boyce v. People, 55 N. Y. 644.

Bacon v. Western, etc., Co., 53 Ind.

229

489

Bailey v. Boyd, 59 Ind. 292.

Bailey v State, 39 Ind. 438......... 572 Bradshaw v. Warner, 54 Ind. 58..325

Bailey v. State, 52 Ind. 462.......... 286 Branham v. Record, 42 Ind. 181...142

Bailey v. Troxell, 43 Ind. 432...... 375 Brannon v. May. 42 Ind. 92..

Bales v. State, 15 Ind. 321.......

Ball v. Balfe, 41 Ind. 221

Bank, etc., v. Patton, 5 How. Miss.

200

584

212 Breckenridge v. McAfee,54 Ind.141.517

266 Briggs v. Wardwell, 10 Mass. 356.234

Broker v. Scobey, 56 Ind. 588......282
...450 Brooks v. Harris, 41 Ind. 390...... 172
398 Brown v. Clarke, 4 How. 4
450
282 Brown v. Duke, 46 Ind. 343.. 441

...

Bargis v. Farrar, 45 Ind. 41.

Barker v. State, 48 Ind. 163

Barnard v. Campau, 29 Mich. 162.589 Brown v. Kirkman, 1 O. S. 116....589

Barnett v. Bullett, 11 Ind. 310.....249 Brunner v. Brennan, 49 Ind. 98... 25

Barnett v. Juday, 38 Ind. 86..... ..301 Brutton v. State, 4 Ind. 601.........443

Barney v. McCarty, 15 Iowa, 510..589 Brydon v. Campbell, 40 Md. 331..589

Barton v. Allbright, 29 Ind. 489..487 Buckner v. State, 56 Ind. 207......335

Batty v. Fout, 54 Ind. 482.

72 Bunts v. Cole, 7 Blackf. 265 ........111