forming the line between the lands of the parties can not be estimated 4. Same.--Costs not Exceeding Damages.-Form of Motion.-Practice.- Held, also, that the proper motion in such case is, "that the plaintiff recover TRIAL BY JURY. See NEW TRIAL, 6. UNCERTAINTY. See CONVEYANCE, 1; PLEADING, 4. USER. See HIGHWAY, 10. VENDOR'S LIEN. 1b. Lands Conveyed to Purchaser's Wife.-Judgment.—Promissory Note.-The Held, on such facts, that the plaintiff is entitled to the lien sought. VENUE, CHANGE OF Humphrey v. Thorn, 296 See CRIMINAL LAW, 17, 37, 71. VENIRE DE NOVO. See CRIMINAL LAW, 26; PRACTICE, 18, 22. VERDICT. See CRIMINAL Law, 25, 26, 40, 42, 57; NEW TRIAL, 9; PRACTICE, 17 to VERIFICATION. VIEWERS. See HIGHWAY, 2, 10. VOTER. See TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE, 1. WAGER. See PREMIUM. See HIGHWAY, 2, 9; Partnership, 3; PRACTICE, 14; SUPREME COURT, 9, 17. WATERCOURSE. WATER-WORKS. See CITY TREASURER, 4 to 14. WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE. See SUPREME COURT. 8. 11, 15; CAIN ". HANNA ET AL., 408. on page 411, of this See ESTOPPEL, 1; HUSBAND AND WIFE, 1 to 4, 6; MORTGAGE, 2; SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. WITNESS. See CRIMINAL LAW, 54, 55, 60; INSANE PERSON, 2; Mortgage, 9; New WORDS AND PHRASES. See CITIES AND Towns, 12; CORPORATION, 5; CRIMINAL LAW, 53; Town- END OF VOL. LXIII. ERRATA.-In Stewart et al. v. Muse, 62 Ind. 385, in the second paragraph REPORTER. |