... engaged in the same general undertaking; that it is not necessary that the servants should be engaged in the same operation or particular work; that it is enough, to bring the case within the general rule of exemption, if they are in the employment... The Central Law Journal - Page 1411900Full view - About this book
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 808 pages
...other courts, in relation to fellow-servants, in which, broadly stated, it is said: " It is sufficient if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purposes. The rule is the same, though... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 812 pages
...that the employees need be engaged in the same common work at the same time. It seems to be sufficient if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purpose. See Hoar v. Merritt, 62 Mich.... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1865 - 722 pages
...or particular work. It is Slattery's Adm'r and Others v. The Toledo and Wabash Railroad. enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged...common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes, as in maintaining and operating a railroad,... | |
| Law - 1869 - 820 pages
...to that of the party by whoso carelessness the injury is inflicted and the damage caused, provided the services of each in his particular sphere or department...directed to the accomplishment of the same general end. These principles have been often under discussion, and are settled by an array of authorities which... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1870 - 616 pages
...the injury is inferior in grade of employment to the one by whose negligence the injury is caused, if the services of each in his particular sphere or...directed to the accomplishment of the same general end. Gillenwater v. The Il. $ IRR Co., 5 Ind. 339, and Fitzpatrick v. The NA & SRR Co., 7 Ind. 436, disapproved.... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1874 - 738 pages
...injury — should be at the time engaged in the same operation or particular work. It is enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged...common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes. This rule, in the full extent in which... | |
| Francis Wharton - Negligence - 1874 - 960 pages
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. These... | |
| Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1876 - 854 pages
...sufferer and the one who causes the Injury should be at the time engaged in tha same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common work and performing duties and services for tha same general purposes, the master is not liable. "... | |
| William Wait - Actions and defenses - 1878 - 1004 pages
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. JLaning... | |
| |