Entered according to act of Congress, in the year 1867, BY BENJAMIN HARRISON, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States, for the District of Indiana. 1867 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDATURE OF THE STATE OF INDIAN, DURING THE PERIOD COMPRISED IN THŇOLUME. Hon. ROBERT C. GREGOI,* * The Hon. ROBERT C. GREGORY was Chief Juste at the May Term, 1866. For previoulecisions of the Supreme Court of this State, overruled, firmed, or modified, see INDEX, tit. CASES OVERRULED:c. TABLE OF THE CASES REPORTED IN TIIIS VOLUME. Board of Commissioners of Mont gomery County, The State cx Abdil v. Abdil........... 287 rel. McCarty, Auditor, &c. v... 522 Abdil, Abdil v ........ 287 343 Adams, Lafayette and Indianap Brown v. Welch.... 116 olis R. R. Co. V........ 76 489 Adams, Whiteside v......... 250 Bunch v Bunclı.... 400 Alexander et al., Martindale v... 104 Bunch, Bunch v....... 400 Allen et al., Hudspeth V............ 165 389 Ammerman v. Crosby 451 Burket et al., Norristown, &c., 329 53 Anderson v. The State.... 89 Butt, Clark Adm'r Romine ...... 230 Anthony, Union Township, Bartholomew County V........ 487 Aydelotte, Hymes V............ 431 Carlisle v. Hyland......... 263 B Carpenter, Crescent Ciry Bank Bailey v. The State. 422 et al. v... 108 Bales v. Scott..... 202 Cassel v. Cassel.... 90 Ballenger v. Oswalt.... 182 Cassel, Cassel v... 90 Ball v. The State........ 155 | Cauble v. Ryman Administrator Bansemer et al., Cole et al. v..... 94 of Wright. 207 Barnes, Pattison V.......... 209 Chapman ct al., Croskey .......... 383 Baum, Evansville and Craw Chicago & G. L. R. R. Co. v Giffordsville R. R. Co. V ......... 70 ford........ 20 Bauman et al. v. Grubbs..... 419 Cincinnilti and Chicago Air Line Beal, Julian v.... 220 R. R. Co. v. McCool........ 140 Beal, Miller v..... 234 City of Jeffersonville v. PatterBehm, Cox V....... 307 son..... 15 Bender et al. y. The State ex rel. City of Lafayette, Stackhouse v. 17 Prettyman, Trustee, &c......... 285 City of Jeffersonville, Shallcross Bevin, The Toledo, Wabash and et al. v........ 193 Western R. R. Co. v.. 443 City of Evansville v. The EvansBlackwell et al. v. The State ex ville Gaslight Co............ 447 rel., Simpson, Guardian, &c... 204 Clark, Adm'r Rominc v. Butt.... 236 Black v. Weathers et al............. 242 | Clark, Davis V..... 424 Board of Commissioners of Tip Cleneny et al. v. The Junction R. pecanoe Co., Hand v............. 179 R. Co............ 375 Board of Commissioners of Mi. Coats v. McKee et al... 223 ami County, Hochstetter v.... 48 ! Coble, Anderson v... 329 (vii) 98 29 33: . ... 388 341 Coen et al. v. Funk.................. 289 Franklin Township Academical 50 Combs v. The State.......... ...... Conrad et al., Harrison Town ship of Cass County V........... 337 Genter et al., Fitzgerald v........ 238 Coon v. Coon.......................... 1891 Gifford, Chicago and Great EastCoon, Coon v....................... 189 crn R. R. Co. v.................... Cooper v. Johnson................... 247 Glidewell v. Spaugh................. 319 Cox v.Delim............ 307 Goff v. Prime, Sheriff of Tipton Crescent City Bank et al. v. Car County,............................. 196 penter................................ 108 Goodrich v. The Winchester and Crosby, Ammerman v. ...... 451 Deerfield Turnpike Co. et al... 119 Croskcy v. Chapman ot al.... Green, Rhode v... 83 Crowfoot v. Zink........... 187 Green, Hull v..... Crull, Stelman V... ..... ... 436 Gregg, logle, Trustee of Spring field Township, Franklin Co., v. 315 Grove, Pace et al. ................. 26 Grubbs, Bauman ct al. V.......... 419 Daggy ct al., Demuth v....... Gwaltncy v. Wheeler et al........ 415 Davis v. Clark......... 424 Dawkins r. Sappington....... 199 1 Dean v. Wilson ................. 205 Debord v. La lluc..... 212 IIall v. Green ........... Delawter v. The Sand Creek IIand y. The Board of CommisDitching Co........................ sioners of Tippecanoc Co....... 179 Demuth v. Daggy et al............. Harrison Township of Cass CounDeputy, Redman V................ 838 ty v. Conrad ct al.... Doan v. The State............ 495 Hawkins v. Miller...... 173 Doran ct al. v. Shaw......... 284 | Ilays, Miller v........................ 380 Drischel, The State v. 180 Heath, Violet v............ 178 Drischel, The Stato r..... 154 Hendricks' Adm'r, The JeffersonDuncan v. Holcomb.... ville R. R. Co. Y................... 228 Dyc, Paxton V......... IIendricks v. The State............ 493 llochstetter, Board of Commis sioners of Miami County v.... IIolcomb, Duncan V................. Hoover et al., Jackson et al. v... Hopkins, Jones v.... 214 al..................... ...... 158 Ilowk v. Melos................. English v. Smith............ 445 Hudspeth v. Allen et al........... Epperly et al. v. White...... 194 Huff, Edgerton et al. V............ Evansville, City of, v. The Ev Hull v. Green........................ ansville Gaslight Co... Ilurt v. The State................... Lvansville Gaslight Co., The Hurt v. Tho State .................. City of Evansville v............ Husband et al., The State ex rel. Evansville and Crawfordsville Alsop v.......... 308 R. R. Co. v. Baum.... ...... Hyer v. Norton..... 269 Hyland, Carlisle v....... 203 Hymes v. Aydelotte.. ... 431 407 337 378 893 48 450 456 70 Farris et al., The Sinnissippi In surance Co. V...................... 342 Fitzgerald v. Genter et al......... 238 Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and Fogle, Trustec of Springfield Cleveland R. R. Co. v. Irish... 268 Township of Franklin County Indianapolis and Cincinnati R. v. Gregs...... ........ 345 l R. Co. v. McClure................. 370 |
Get this book in print