Imitation, of Extension,-of Personification,-of Combination, &c.? Do not the pleasures of imagination enable the mind to indulge its delight in aspiring to perfection? In regions mild of calm and serene air, Above the smoke and stir of this dim spot, Which men call earth, and with low thoughted care Strive to keep up a frail and feverish being, &c. Do not the pleasures of imagination enable the mind to indulge its love of the invisible, and its creative powers? There is a spirit within us, which arrays The thing we dote upon with colourings Richer than roseses-brighter than the beams Of the clear sun at morning, when he flings And scare the Sylvan from voluptuous dreams. BARRY CORNWALL. ON THE NIGHTINGALE. The voice I hear this passing night was heard SATURN. Deep in the shady sadness of a vale Far sunken from the healthy breath of morn, Like cloud on cloud. No stir of air was there, It is a stormy night, and the wild sea, KEATS. KEATS. And, crowding onwards, seem as they would reach Though all the elements in their might have met, BARRY CORNWALL. Two voices are there; one is of the sea, Thou fought'st against him; but hast vainly striven: Does Fiction exceed Reality? WORDSWORTH. Bacon, speaking of Magic, says, "Surely he shall not much err, who shall say, that this kind of magic is as far differing in truth of nature, from such a knowledge as we require, as the Books of the Jests of Arthur of Britain, or of Hugh of Burdeaux, differs from Cæsar's Commentaries in truth of story. For it is manifest, that Cæsar did greater things de vero,' than they durst feign of their Heroes; but he did them not in that fabulous manner." And, in his Novum Organum, Art. 87, after having mentioned various vain imaginations, he says, "The truth is, there seems to be the same difference in the doctrines of philosophy, between these vanities, and the real arts; as there is between the historical narrations of the exploits of Julius Cæsar, or Alexander the Great, and the achievements of Amadis de Gaul, or Arthur of Britain. For those celebrated emperors are found, in fact, to have accomplished greater things, than the other shadowy heroes are even feigned to have done; and yet this by such means as are no way fabulous or monstrous.' says, William Wordsworth, in his preface to the Lyrical Ballads, "Whatever portion of this faculty we may suppose even the greatest poet to possess, there cannot be a doubt but that the language which it will suggest to him, must, in liveliness and truth, fall far short of that which is uttered by men in real life, under the actual pressure of those passions, certain shadows of which the Poet thus produces, or feels to be produced, in himself." In a modern novel there is the following passage:"Were a thousandth part of the living romances of the time to be given to the world, those inventions which have staggered credulity would be pronounced tame and insipid, and all would declare what every one can vouch from his own experience, that romance is the mere commonplace of life, and, like some of the general phenomena of nature, is incredible only to those who do not examine into that which forms the very essence of their own being." Which are the greatest, the pleasures of imagination or of reality? In the address to the reader in the Sylva Sylvarum, Bacon thus concludes: "This work of Natural History is the world, as God made it, and not as men have made it, for it hath nothing of imagination." That there are pleasures of imagination, who can doubt? Who can think, without delight, of the Lady in Comus, or of Ariel? Where the bee sucks, there suck I, So far from doubting the existence of these pleasures, it is obvious that they are so intense, as, without the greatest caution, to absorb and mislead the mind. "Great pleasures," says Philosophy, "are only for extraordinary occasions." May I," says the old maxim, "be wise enough to write one poem, and wise enough not to write more than one." I thought of Chatterton, the marvellous boy- Of him who walked in glory and in joy, Following his plough along the mountain side. We poets, in our youth, begin in gladness, But thereof comes in the end despondency and madness. WORDSWORTH. The question, therefore, is not whether there are pleasures of imagination, or whether these pleasures, when properly directed, that is when they are real, are not exquisite, but whether, when excessive or erroneous, they are not exceeded by the real delights of the same nature for which they are substituted. Are not the delights of true more exquisite than the delights of false religion, of the Christian than of the Turk? Are not the delights of real affection and love more exquisite than all such delights conceived by imagination? Take any specimen of imaginary love, and contrast it with reality. Take, for instance, the milkmaid's song from Marlowe : We will sit upon the rocks, And see the shepherds feed our flocks And I will make thee beds of roses, With coral clasps and amber studs. Contrast this with the description of real affection: Did my sweet Lucy know Who ne'er deserted me: Oft from my brow, with trembling hand, She wiped the damps away. And when this heart, my Lucy, Shall cease to beat for thee, &c. Can this reality be contrasted with the fiction from Marlowe, without acknowledging the truth of Sir W. Raleigh's answer: Thy belt of straw and ivy buds, What should we talk of dainties then, Which God has blest, and sent for food. Again, let any imagination exceed the grief of a family as described in the following verse from an old song: "His mother from the window look'd, With all the longings of a mother— The green wood path to meet her brother. They only heard the roar of Yarrow !" Take again the pleasures of kindness. We all remember the account in the beginning of Tom Jones, of Mr. Allworthy's return from London, when he retired much fatigued to his chamber. "Here, having spent some minutes on his knees, a custom which he never broke through on any account, he was preparing to step into bed, when, upon opening the clothes, to his great surprise, he beheld an infant, wrapt up in some coarse linen, in a sweet and profound sleep, between his sheets." The servants were summoned. When Mrs. Deborah came into the room, and was acquainted by her master with the finding the little infant, her consternation was rather greater than his had been; nor could she refrain from crying out, with great horror of accent as well as look, " My good sir! what's to be done? If I might be so bold as to give my advice, I would have it put in a basket, and sent out and laid at the churchwarden's door. It is a good night, only a little rainy and windy; and, if it was well wrapt up, and put in a warm basket, it is two to one but it lives till it is found in the morning.' Mr. Allworthy had now got one of his fingers into the infant's hand, which by its gentle pressure seeming to implore his assistance, out-pleaded the eloquence of Mrs. Deborah. " Let any imaginary pleasure of kindness be contrasted with this; or if this be supposed imaginary, take the following extract from an account published some years since by a person who, at midnight, was intrusted in London with a respite for two men, who were to be executed in the country, at the distance of sixty miles, the next morning at eight o'clock. He says, "The horse-guards' clock struck eleven as I entered Whitehall; before twelve o'clock I, with the respite in my |