Principal and agent-Question for the jury on facts of Mandamus-Boundary-stream bridges-See Township Board 48 606 Money advanced by a son to his father towards erecting a OTSEGO WATER-POWER COMPANY, HEFFELMAN V., 117 290 121 P. PELTON, BEARINGER V., PEOPLE V. KEIR, Municipal corporations-Provision that no ordinance shall PERKINS, CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS V., 109 98 93 1 86 50 Arrest Of an alleged prostitute by a police officer on mere suspicion that she is plying her vocation upon the street, no act being committed in his presence indicating that she is there for that purpose, is illegal. Draw-bridge-Used for railroad and wagon road purposes -Wheels supporting the draw are held not to be a part of the roadway, so used, under an agreement by a railroad and a bridge company to severally keep in repair the roadway which it used, while all other portions of the bridge were to be maintained by them in common. PORT HURON TOWNSHIP, POTTS v., POTTS, TOWNSHIP OF PORT HURON V., POWERS, CHESEBRO V., POYER, HUTCHINSON V., PURDON V. SELIGMAN, Statute of limitations-How. Stat. § 8724, which allows suit within two years after the discovery of a cause of action which has been "fraudulently concealed" from the knowledge of the plaintiff, construed. PAGE 255 426 435 435 472 337 132 RAJNOWSKI V. DETROIT, BAY CITY & ALPENA RAILROAD COM- Abatement-Assignment of plaintiff's interest in suit, to RANDALL, STROBRIDGE LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY V., . Judgment creditor's bill-Answer only treated as an affi- 80 334 681 195 10 Rankin v. Rothschild-Continued. receiver on bill and answer, before the time for replying RANNEY V. DONOVAN, Statute of frauds-Evidence of a verbal option to sell land RHODES, FULLER V., PAGE 318 36 126 SEBERT V. CITY OF ALPENA, Highways-Statute requiring same to be kept in repair 165 Sebert v. City of Alpena-Continued. PAGE repair-Dangers surrounding traveler at night should be taken into consideration by municipal authorities-Roadway is required to be kept in a reasonably safe condition -Whether such roadway requires use of entire width of street, depends upon the necessities of travel in any given case, of which the proper authorities must take notice, at their peril. Bills and notes-Agreement by one of three joint makers with the payee, by which two-thirds of the note is to be collected of his co-promisors, and the remaining onethird of said maker, which payment is made by them, but not in reliance upon such agreement, of which they are ignorant, will be enforced. Delivery-Recording mortgage by mortgagor, which record is assented to by all parties in interest, renders manual delivery unimportant-Especially is this so, as between the parties, where the object of the record is to defraud creditors-In this case a mortgagor is held estopped from questioning the validity of a mortgage given for that purpose, as against an innocent purchaser-EjectmentIf homestead rights are involved, wife is a necessary party. Mortgage-Conditioned for the payment of a given sum to each of several mortgagees-Delivery to one, held a delivery to all-Security of each is confined to the sum named in the mortgage which it creates as a new principal-On the foreclosure of such a mortgage, payment of the proved debts should be decreed from the proceeds of the sale-Personal liability clause-Absence of from decree is no ground for appeal, unless its non-existence is declared -Deficiency-Jurisdiction to decree payment of is limited to cases where mortgage is given to secure a written obligation, capable of legal enforcement, and not outlawed-New hearing, after deficiency is reported, must 50 132 234 627 Shelden v. Erskine-Continued. be had-Decree for payment made in advance of sale can fix no rights-Statute authorizing decree for payment of deficiency does not contemplate a case where there are several complainants who hold the mortgage jointly, but have no general right to any of the debt secured. PAGE 234 334 Mechanics' lien law of 1887-Judgment under, in so far as it establishes personal liability, affirmed. STREET RAILWAY COMPANY OF GRAND RAPIDS, LITTLE V., Partnership-Liability of new partner on notes given in Jury-Peremptory challenge after jury is sworn-Refusal to allow, not error-Note given in renewal of one which is paid, which is its sole consideration, is void for want of consideration. TICE V. BAY CITY, Constitutional law-Act No. 264, Laws of 1887, providing 438 124 209 |